Sensitivity of groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 concentrations and canopy structure

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 97, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1039-1050

  Ficklin, Darren L ^a   Luedeling, Eike ^a,b   Zhang, Minghua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Climate change; Groundwater; Hydrology; HYDRUS; Recharge; Vadose zone

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WATER; ATMOSPHERIC CO; CALIFORNIA; CANOPY STRUCTURE; CLIMATE PROJECTION; DAILY TEMPERATURES; FULLY SATURATED POROUS MEDIA; FUTURE CLIMATE; GROUND WATER RECHARGE; GROUND-WATER HYDROLOGY; GROWING SEASON; HEAT UNITS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESS; HYDRUS-1D; IN-PLANTS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE; IRRIGATION WATER USE; PARTIALLY SATURATED; PENMAN-MONTEITH EQUATIONS; PLANT GROWTH; POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; SEMI-ARID REGION; TEMPORAL SHIFTS; VADOSE ZONE; WATER MOVEMENTS;

ARID REGIONS; ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); CROPS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FRUITS; HYDROLOGY; IRRIGATION; PLANT LIFE EXTENSION; POROUS MATERIALS; WATER SUPPLY;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATIC REGION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CROP PLANT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; GROWING SEASON; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGY; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PENMAN-MONTEITH EQUATION; RECHARGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; VADOSE ZONE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

CALIFORNIA; SAN JOAQUIN BASIN; UNITED STATES;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MEDICAGO SATIVA; PRUNUS DULCIS;

EID: 77950546830     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. 2: productivity and water relations. Environmental and Experimental Biology 55 (2006) 130-141
2. 2 and water-availability effect on gas exchange and nodule development in N-2-fixing alfalfa plants. Environmental and Experimental Biology 65 (2009) 18-26
3. Boswell V.G. The influence of temperature upon the growth and yield of garden peas. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 23 (1926) 162-168
4. Burow, K.R., Panshin, S.Y., Dubrovsky, N.M., Vanbrocklin, D., Fogg, G.E., 1999. Evaluation of processes affecting 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) concentrations in ground water in the eastern San Joaquin Valley, California: analysis of chemical data and ground water flow and transport simulations. U.S. Geological Survey Pub. WRI 99-4059, pp. 57.
5. Burow K.R., Shelton J.L., and Dubrovsky N.M. Regional nitrate and pesticide trends in ground water in the eastern San Joaquin Valley, California. Journal of Environmental Quality 37 (2008) S-249-S-263
6. California Agriculture Resource Directory (CARD), 2009. California Department of Food and Agriculture. Available at: http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/statistics/.
7. California Department of Finance (CA-DOF), 2007. California's agricultural commodities: commodity ranking, acreage, production value, crop harvest seasons, and leading producing counties, 2007. Available at: http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/FS_DATA/STAT-ABS/documents/G13A.pdf.
8. California Department of Water Resources (DWR), 2003. Bulletin 118: California's Groundwater, 2003. Available at: http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/bulletin118/bulletin118update2003.cf m.
9. Cavagnaro, T., Jackson, L., Scow, K., 2006. Climate Change: challenges and solutions for California agricultural landscapes. A report from: California Climate Change Center. CEC-500-2005-189-SF.
10. Cross H.Z., and Zuber M.S. Prediction of flowering dates in maize based on different methods of estimating thermal units. Agronomy Journal 26 (1972) 351-355
11. 2?. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48 (1997) 609-639
12. 2. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 59 (1992) 17-34
13. Eckhardt K., and Ulbrich U. Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range. Journal of Hydrology 284 (2003) 244-252
14. Faunt, C. ed., 2009. Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1766, 225 p. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1766.
15. Feddes R., Kowalik P., and Zaradny H. Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield (1978), John Wiley and Sons, NY
16. Ficklin D., Luo Y., Luedeling E., and Zhang M. Climate change sensitivity assessment on the San Joaquin Watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology 347 (2009) 16-29 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.05.016
17. 2: cellular responses and global significance. Annals of Botany 94 (2004) 647-656
18. Guerra L., Hoogenboom G., Boken V., Hook J., Thomas D., and Harrison K. Evaluation of the EPIC model for simulating crop yield and irrigation demand. Transactions of the ASAE 47 (2004) 2091-2100
19. Hatfield J., Reginato R., and Idso S. Evaluation of canopy temperature-evapotranspiration models over various crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 32 (1984) 41-53
20. Howell T.A. Irrigation Efficiency. Encyclopedia of Soil Science (2003), Taylor & Francis, New York, NY pp.936-949
21. IPCC. Special Report on Emission Scenarios (2001), Cambridge University Press 612 pp.
22. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
23. Magoon C.A., and Culpepper C.W. Response of sweet corn to varying temperatures from time of planting to canning maturity. USDA Technical Bulletin (1932) 312
24. Maurer E.P. Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emission scenarios. Climatic Change 82 (2007) 309-325
25. 2 concentrations: a synthesis. New Phytologist 149 (2001) 247-264
26. Monteith J.L. Evaporation and environment. In: Fogg G.E. (Ed). Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, vol. 19 (1965), Academic Press, Inc., NY 205-234
27. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Binger R.L., Harmel R.D., and Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50 (2007) 885-900
28. 2 concentrations. I. Leaf area, water use and transpiration. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11 (1984) 361-374
29. 2 Stomatal Function (1987), Stanford University Press, Stanford California pp. 229-251
30. Mualem Y. A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12 (1976) 513-522
31. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), 2009. 2009 Census of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov.
32. National Assessment Synthesis Team. Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change (2001), Ed C U Press, Cambridge, U.K.
33. Neuman S., Feddes R., and Bresler E. Finite element analysis of two-dimensional flow in soil considering water uptake by roots. I. Theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal 35 (1975) 224-230
34. Nietsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R., and King K.W. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theroretical Documentation. Version 2005 (2005), Texas Water Resource Institute, College Station, TX
35. Pallas J.E. Transpiration and stomatal opening with changes in carbon dioxide content of air. Science 147 (1965) 171
36. Penman H.L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A193 (1948) 120-146
37. 2 and plant structure: a review. Global Change Biology 5 (1999) 807-837
38. Richards L.A. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1 (1931) 313-333
39. Ritchie, I.T. and NeSmith, D.S., 1991. Temperature and crop development. In: R.J. Hanks and J.T. Ritchie (eds.) Modeling Plant and Soil Systems. American Society of Agronomy Mongograph 31, Madison, WI. pp. 5-29.
40. Scanlon B.R., Healy R.W., and Cook P.G. Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeology Journal 10 (2002) 18-39
41. Schaap M.G., Leij F.J., and van Genuchten M.Th. ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology 241 (2001) 163-176
42. Scibek J., Allen D., Cannon A., and Whitfield P. Groundwater-surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology 333 (2007) 165-181
43. Šimunek J., van Genuchten M.Th., and Sejna M. The HYDRUS-1D Software Package for Simulating the Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably Saturated Media, Version 3.0 (2005), Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA 270 pp.
44. Singleton M.J., Esser B.K., Moran J.E., Hudson G.B., McNab W.W., and Harter T. Saturated zone denitrification: potential for natural attenuation of nitrate contamination in shallow groundwater under dairy operations. Environmental Science and Technology 41 (2007) 759-765
45. Snyder R., Orang M., Bali K., and Eching S. Basic Irrigation Scheduling (2007), University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. http://biomet.ucdavis.edu/irrigation_scheduling/bis/BIS.htm p. 10. Available at: http://biomet.ucdavis.edu/irrigation_scheduling/bis/BIS.htm.
46. Spurlock F., Burow K., and Dubrovsky N. Chlorofluorocarbon dating of herbicide containing well waters in Fresno and Tulare Counties. Journal of Environmental Quality 29 (2000) 474-483
47. Stockle C.O., Williams J.R., Rosenberg N.J., and Jones C.A. A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops. Part I. Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis. Agricultural Systems 38 (1992) 225-238
48. USDA. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database (2007), United States Department of Agriculture
49. USEPA. California Alfalfa (Northern and Southern) Metadata (2009). http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/met_ca_alfalfa.htm Available at: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/met_ca_alfalfa.htm.
50. van Genuchten M.Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44 (1980) 892-898
51. Vossen P. California Climate Zones for Growing Temperate Tree Fruits and Nuts (2008), University of California Cooperative Extension. http://homeorchard.ucdavis.edu/backyard-climate.pdf Available at: http://homeorchard.ucdavis.edu/backyard-climate.pdf.
52. Wessolek G., and Asseng S. Trade-off between wheat yield and drainage under current and climate change conditions in northeast Germany. European Journal of Agronomy 24 (2006) 333-342
53. Williams J.R., Jones C.A., Kiniry J.R., and Spanel D.A. The EPIC crop growth model. Transactions of the ASAE 32 (1989) 497-511
54. 2 enrichment schemes-cucumbers and tomatoes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 44 (1989) 275-293
55. Yin J., Young M., and Yu Z. Effects of paleoclimate and time-varying canopy structures on paleowater fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 113 (2008) 1-14
56. Zuppi G., and Sacchi E. Hydrogeology as a climate recorder: Sahara-Sahel (North Africa) and the Po Plain (Northern Italy). Global Planet Change 40 (2004) 79-91