Responsiveness and Predictive Validity of the Hierarchical Balance Short Forms in People With Stroke

Physical Therapy

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 798-808

  Yu, Wan Hui ^a   Chen, Kuan Lin ^a   Chou, Yeh Tai ^b   Hsueh, I Ping ^a,c   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; POSTURAL BALANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLING STUDIES; STROKE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84878452873     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120259     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:30-38.
2. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:341-346.
3. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:559-566.
4. Bohannon RW, Leary KM. Standing balance and function over the course of acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:994-996.
5. Sandin KJ, Smith BS. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke. 1990;21:82-86.
6. Nichols DS, Miller L, Colby LA, Pease WS. Sitting balance: its relation to function in individuals with hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:865-869.
7. Juneja G, Czyrny JJ, Linn RT. Admission balance and outcomes of patients admitted for acute inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77:388-393.
8. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:1022-1027.
9. Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41:304-311.
10. Benaim C, Perennou DA, Villy J, et al. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke. 1999;30:1862-1868.
11. Chien CW, Lin JH, Wang CH, et al. Developing a Short Form of the Postural Assessment Scale for people with Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:81-90.
12. Hou WH, Chen JH, Wang YH, et al. Development of a set of functional hierarchical balance short forms for patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92: 1119-1125.
13. Hsueh IP, Chen JH, Wang CH, et al. Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing balance function in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1336-1344.
14. Tamanini JT, Dambros M, D'Ancona CA, et al. Responsiveness to the Portuguese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31: 482-490.
15. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459-468.
16. Wang CH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Discriminative, predictive, and evaluative properties of a trunk control measure in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 2005;85: 887-894.
17. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
18. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:479-489.
19. Liaw LJ, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, et al. The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:656-661.
20. Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther. 1999;79:8-23.
21. Wang CH, Hsieh CL, Dai MH, et al. Interrater reliability and validity of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:20-24.
22. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, et al. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003;83: 617-630.
23. Hsieh CL, Hoffmann T, Gustafsson L, Lee YC. The diverse constructs use of activities of daily living measures in stroke randomized controlled trials in the years 2005-2009. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:720-726.
24. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64-67.
25. Supervia A, Aranda D, Márquez MA, et al. Predicting length of hospitalisation of elderly patients, using the Barthel Index. Age Ageing. 2008;37:339-342.
26. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther. 1988;68: 1077-1081.
27. Gosman-Hedström G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:702-715.
28. Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:922-928.
29. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:480-484.
30. Holmes WC, Shea JA. Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic seropositive individuals. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:561-571.
31. Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat. 1983;37:36-48.
32. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:17.
33. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:897-906.
34. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171-178.
35. Chou CY, Chien CW, Hsueh IP, et al. Developing a short form of the Berg Balance Scale for people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:195-204.
36. Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven HJR, Geurts ACH. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45:1195-1213.