Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Motor Component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: The impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 922-928

  Wallace, Dennis ^a   Duncan, Pamela W ^b,c   Lai, Sue Min ^d  

^a RHO INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Department of Preventive Medicine and Center on Aging ^*

Author keywords

Outcomes; Rehabilitation; Responsiveness measures; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS; STROKE; TECHNIQUE; TIME; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0036709991     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00410-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brott T., Bogousslavsky J. Treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 343:2000;710-722.
2. Thorvaldsen P., Kuulasmaa K., Rajakangas A.M., Rastenyte D., Sari C., Wilhelmsen L. Stroke trends in the WHO MONICA project. Stroke. 28:1997;500-506.
3. American Heart Association Heart and stroke facts. 2000;American Heart Association; Dallas.
4. Broderick J., Brott T., Kothari R., Miller R., Khoury J., Pancioli A., Gebel J., Mills D., Minneci L., Shukla R. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky stroke study. preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks Stroke. 29:1998;415-421.
5. Duncan P. Clinical and measurement issues in selecting stroke outcome measures in clinical trials. Goldstein L. Restorative neurology. Advances in the pharmacotherapy of recovery after stroke. 1998;Futura Publishing; Mt. Kisco, NY.
6. Pedersen P.M., Jorgensen H.S., Nakayama H., Raaschou H.O., Olsen T.S. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78:1997;161-165.
7. Greshan G.E., Duncan P.W., Stason W.B., Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Panel Post stroke clinical guideline No. 16. (AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662). 1995;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; Rockville, MD.
8. Kidd D., Stewart G., Baldry J., Johnson J., Rossiter D., Petruckevitch A., Thompson A.J. The functional independence measure. a comparative validity and reliability study Disabil Rehabil. 17:1995;10-14.
9. Shah S., Vanclay F., Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 42:1989;703-709.
10. Duncan P.W., Lai S.M., van Culin V., Huang L., Clausen D., Wallace D. Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke. Clin Geriatr Med. 15:1999;885-915.
11. van der Putten J.J.M.F., Hobart J.C., Freeman J.A., Thompson A.J. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation. comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 66:1999;480-484.
12. Kirshner B., Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 38:1985;27-36.
13. Guyatt G.H., Deyo R.A., Charlson M., Levine M.N., Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement. a clarification J Clin Epidemiol. 42:1989;403-408.
14. Liang M.H. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol. 22:1995;1191-1192.
15. Deyo R.A., Centor R.M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change. an analogy to diagnostic test performance J Chronic Dis. 39:1986;897-906.
16. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time. assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis. 40:1987;171-178.
17. Kazis L.E., Anderson J.J., Meenan R.F. Effects sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 27:1989;S178-S189.
18. Wright J.G., Young N.L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;239-246.
19. Wallace D., Duncan P.W., Lai S.M. Are the FIM Instrument motor scale and Barthel Index responsive to stroke recovery? Stroke. 31:2000;301.
20. World Health Organization. 1993. Proposal for the multi national monitoring and determinants of cerebrovascular disease project WHO/MNC82 Rev. 1. Geneva: WHO.
21. Brott T., Adams H.P., Olinger C.P., Marler J.R., Barsan W.G., Biller J., Spilker J., Holleran R., Eberle R., Hertzberg V. Measurement of acute cerebral infarction. a clinical examination scale Stroke. 20:1989;864-870.
22. Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B., Keith R.A., Zielizuy M., Sherwin F.S. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Rehabil. 1:1986;59-74.
23. Kalra L., Crome P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 41:1993;396-400.
24. van Swieten J.C., Kaiudstaal P.F., Visser M.C., Schouten H.J.A., van Gigin J. Interobserver agreement for assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 19:1988;604-607.
25. Mahoney F.I., Barthel D.W. Functional evaluation. The Barthel Index Md State Med J. 14:1965;61-65.
26. Deyo R.A., Diehr P., Patrick D.L. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Control Clin Trials. 12:1991;142S-158S.
27. Hagen K.B., Smedstat L.M., Uhlig T., Kvien T.K. The responsiveness of health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. comparison of disease-specific and generic instruments J Rheumatol. 26:1999;1474-1480.
28. Beaton D.E., Hogg-Johnson S., Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status. reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;79.
29. de Bruin A.F., Diederiks J.P.M., de Witte L.P., Stevens F.C.J., Philipsen H. Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure. the Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68 J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;529-540.
30. van Bennekom C.A.M., Jelles F., Lankhorst G.J., Bouter L.M. Responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile and the Barthel Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 49:1996;39-44.
31. Katz J.N., Larson M.G., Phillips C.B., Fosssel A.H., Liang M.H. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 30:1992;917-925.