Intergroup perception and proactive majority integration attitudes

Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 196-207

  Phelps, Joshua M ^a   Ommundsen, Reidar ^a   Türken, Salman ^a   Ulleberg, Pål ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Entitativity; Integration; Intergroup perception; Majority attitudes; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878422967     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000104     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243-250.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism.Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
4. Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34.
7. Bourhis, R.Y., Möise, L.C., Perreault, S., & Senécal, S. (1997). Toward an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.
8. Breugelmans, S. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). Antecedents and components of majority attitudes toward multiculturalism in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology, 53, 400-422. (Pubitemid 38882815)
9. Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what's the mechanism? (Don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550-558.
10. Campbell, D. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
11. Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarization effect of entitativity. Political Psychology, 24, 449-468. (Pubitemid 36989855)
12. Common Basic Principles. (2010). Common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.enaro.eu/ dsip/download/eu-Common-Basic-Principles.pdf.
13. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
14. Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003.
15. Denson, T., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The role of entitativity and essentiality in judgment of collective responsibility. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 43-61. (Pubitemid 43141819)
16. Directorate of Integration and Diversity. (2009). Immigrants in Norwegian media. Directorate of Integration and Diversity report (DID). Retrieved from http://www.DID.no/Documents/Artikler/Eng-Immigrants-in-Media-09-v2.pdf.
17. Dixon, J. (2001). Contact and boundaries: Locating the social psychology of intergroup relations. Theory and Psychology, 11, 587-608.
18. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711. (Pubitemid 41527567)
19. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., &Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872.
20. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and intergroup behavior. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 84-126). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of "we": Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3-20.
22. Ekehammer, B., & Akrami, N. (2007). Personality and prejudice. From big five to facets. Journal of Personality, 75, 899-925.
23. Eriksen, T. H. (2007). Complexity in social and cultural integration: Some analytical dimensions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 1055-1069. (Pubitemid 47491477)
24. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. (2009). ECRI report on Norway (fourth monitoring cycle). Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/ monitoring/ecri/country-bycountry/norway/nor-cbc-iv-2009-004-eng.pdf.
25. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83. (Pubitemid 46188417)
26. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
27. Fiske, S.T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
28. Gaertner, S. L., &Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
29. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B., & Ward, C.M. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402.
30. Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2010). Intersubjectivity: Toward a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 40, 19-46.
31. Goodman, S., & Burke, S. (2011). Discursive deracialization intalk about asylum seeking. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 111-123.
32. Goodwin, S. A., Operario, D., & Fiske, S.T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 677-698.
33. Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Suszak, H. (2008). Conspiracy stereotyping and perception of group entitativity of Jews, Germans, Arabs and homosexuals by Polish students. Psychological Reports, 102, 755-758.
34. Gullestad, M. (2006). Plausible prejudice. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
35. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355. (Pubitemid 126421434)
36. Hodson, G. (2009). The puzzling person-situation schism in prejudice research. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 247-248.
37. Huo, Y. J., & Molina, L. E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 359-376. (Pubitemid 43918991)
38. International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://ipip.ori.org.
39. Jackson, L.M., & Esses, V. (2000). Effects of perceived economic competition on people's willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 419-435.
40. Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research. London: Tavistock.
41. Lee, T. L., & Fiske, S.T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768. (Pubitemid 44575884)
42. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
43. Matera, C., Sefanile, C., & Brown, R. (2011). The role of immigrant acculturation preferences and generational status in determining majority intergroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 776-785.
44. Meeus, J., Duriez, B., Vanbeselaere, N., Phalet, K., & Kuppens, P. (2009). Examining dispositional and situational effects on outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 23, 307-328.
45. Montreuil, A., & Bourhis, R.Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward "valued" and "devalued" immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 698-719.
46. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperception. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330.
47. Open Society Institute. (2010). Muslims in Hamburg. Retrieved from http://www.soros.org/initiatives/home/articles-publications/publications/ muslims-hamburg-20100629/a-muslims-hamburg-en-20100629.pdf.
48. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339-367.
49. Park, B., & Judd, C.M. (2005). Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 108-130. (Pubitemid 40906205)
50. Penninx, R. (2003). Integration: The role of communities, institutions, and the state. Migration policy institute. Retrieved from http://www. migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=168#top.
51. Phelps, J.M. (submitted). Social psychological explorations of diversity ideologies, group boundaries, and majority integration attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.
52. Phelps, J. M., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H. E., &Rand- Hendriksen, K. (2012). Ideological boundary developments in the Norwegian multicultural society: A longitudinal study of public discourse. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 187-205.
53. Phelps, J.M., Eilertsen, D.E., Türken, S., &Ommundsen, R. (2011). Integrating immigrantminorities. Developing a scale tomeasure majority members' attitudes toward their own proactive efforts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 404-410.
54. Pittinsky, T., & Montoya, R.M. (2009). Is valuing equality enough? Equality values, allophilia, and social policy support for multiracial individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 151-163.
55. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
56. Ringen, S. (2005, July 28). Flerkulturell, gjensidig integrering [Multicultural, mutual integration]. Aftenposten, Kultur p. 4.
57. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (2004). The mental representation of social categories: Category boundaries, entitativity, and stereotype change. In V. Yzrebyt, C.M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 79-100). New York: Psychology Press.
59. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice. A metaanalysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 248-279.
60. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
61. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
62. Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 369-388.
63. Spencer-Rodgers, J., Williams, M.J., Hamilton, D. L., Peng, K., & Wang, L. (2007). Culture and group perception: Dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 525-543.
64. Stokke, O. (2010, May 03). Ikke lenger stakkarslige [No longer miserable]. Aftenposten, Nyheter p. 6.
65. Strack, F., & Förster, J. (2009). Social cognition. In J. Forgas & A. Kruglanski (Series Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology (Vol. 7). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Türken, S., & Rudmin, F. W. (in press). On psychological consequences of globalization: Development of a scale of global identity. Psychology and Society.
67. Van Lange, P. A. M., Schippers, M., & Balliet, D. (2010). Whovolunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 279-284.
68. van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). "It's not tolerance I'm asking for, it's respect!" A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organizationsberatung, 38, 185-200.
69. Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Martin, K. J., & Roy, S. A. (2000). Metastereotype activation: Evidence from indirect experience by members of dominant groups in interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690-707.
70. Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O'Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of metastereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 917-937.
71. Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Pinter, B. (2004). The perception of outgroup threat: Content and activation of the outgroup schema. In V. Yzrebyt, C.M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 335-360). New York: Psychology Press.
72. Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (Eds). (2004). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press.
73. Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right- Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863-872. (Pubitemid 41070251)