Future directions in IAT: Better studies, better selection, better timing and better techniques

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Yoo, Albert J ^a   Leslie Mazwi, Thabele M ^a   Jovin, Tudor G ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; BRAIN INFARCTION SIZE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBRAL REVASCULARIZATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACTUAL DATABASE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; NEUROIMAGING; NOTE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RANKIN SCALE; REPERFUSION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VASCULAR ACCESS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; PATIENT SELECTION; STROKE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84878403579     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010741     Document Type: Note

References (62)

1. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914-23.
2. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904-13.
3. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893-903.
4. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993-1003. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105335
5. Quinn TJ, Ray G, Atula S, et al. Deriving modified Rankin scores from medical case-records. Stroke 2008;39:3421-3.
6. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Grant M, et al. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2002;33:2243-6. (Pubitemid 35014637)
7. Puntmann VO. How-to guide on biomarkers: biomarker definitions, validation and applications with examples from cardiovascular disease. Postgrad Med J 2009;85:538-45.
8. Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA, Nogueira RG, et al. Infarct volume is a pivotal biomarker after intra-arterial stroke therapy. Stroke 2012;43:1323-30.
9. Zaidi SF, Aghaebrahim A, Urra X, et al. Final infarct volume is a stronger predictor of outcome than recanalization in patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with endovascular therapy. Stroke 2012;43:3238-44.
10. Saver JL, Johnston KC, Homer D, et al. Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trials. The RANTTAS Investigators. Stroke 1999;30:293-8. (Pubitemid 29071792)
11. Soares BP, Chien JD, Wintermark M. MR and CT monitoring of recanalization, reperfusion, and penumbra salvage: everything that recanalizes does not necessarily reperfuse! Stroke 2009;40(3 Suppl.):S24-7.
12. Yoo AJ, Simonsen CZ, Prabhakaran S, et al. Refining angiographic biomarkers of reperfusion: modified TICI is superior to TIMI for predicting clinical outcomes after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 2013;44:A62.
13. Saver JL, Warach S, Janis S, et al. Standardizing the structure of stroke clinical and epidemiologic research data: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Common Data Element (CDE) project. Stroke 2012;43:967-73.
14. Mehta B, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Chandra RV, et al. Assessing variability in neurointerventional practice patterns for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg Published Online First: 20 Dec 2012.
15. Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA, Leslie-Mazwi TM, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: current indications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;15:33-40.
16. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003-11.
17. Lansberg MG, Straka M, Kemp S, et al. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860-7.
18. Yoo AJ, Verduzco LA, Schaefer PW, et al. MRI-based selection for intra-arterial stroke therapy: value of pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume in selecting patients with acute stroke who will benefit from early recanalization. Stroke 2009;40:2046-54.
19. Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA, Gonzalez RG, et al. The Penumbra Pivotal and PICS Investigators. Refining the Pre-Treatment noncontrast CT ASPECTS threshold for IAT selection: pooled analysis of the penumbra pivotal study and PICS registry. Stroke 2012;43:A72.
20. Chandra RV, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Oh DC, et al. Elderly patients are at higher risk for poor outcomes after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 2012;43:2356-61.
21. Jadhav AP, Nanduri S, Aghaebrahim A, et al. Octogenarians have high rates of favorable outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute stroke due to M1 occlusions if final infarct volumes are small. Stroke 2013;44:ATP6.
22. Khatri P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, et al. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009;73:1066-72.
23. Schellinger PD, Bryan RN, Caplan LR, et al. Evidence-based guideline: the role of diffusion and perfusion MRI for the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;75:177-85.
24. Kamalian S, Maas MB, Goldmacher GV, et al. CT Cerebral Blood Flow maps optimally correlate with admission diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke but thresholds vary by postprocessing platform. Stroke 2011;42:1923-8.
25. Carroll TJ, Teneggi V, Jobin M, et al. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1149-56. (Pubitemid 35006808)
26. Fiorella D, Heiserman J, Prenger E, et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of postprocessing dynamic CT perfusion data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:97-107. (Pubitemid 38129487)
27. Takasawa M, Jones PS, Guadagno JV, et al. How reliable is perfusion MR in acute stroke? Validation and determination of the penumbra threshold against quantitative PET. Stroke 2008;39:870-7. (Pubitemid 351619576)
28. Gonzalez RG. Low signal, high noise and large uncertainty make CT perfusion unsuitable for acute ischemic stroke patient selection for endovascular therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:242-5.
29. Pulli B, Schaefer PW, Hakimelahi R, et al. Acute ischemic stroke: infarct core estimation on CT angiography source images depends on CT angiography protocol. Radiology 2012;262:593-604.
30. Schellinger PD, Jansen O, Fiebach JB, et al. Feasibility and practicality of MR imaging of stroke in the management of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1184-9. (Pubitemid 30655650)
31. Solling C, Ashkanian M, Hjort N, et al. Feasibility and logistics of MRI before thrombolytic treatment. Acta Neurol Scand 2009;120:143-9.
32. Mehta BP, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Chandra RV, et al. Reducing time to intra-arterial therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:A19.
33. Souza LC, Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA, et al. Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1331-6.
34. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010;375:1695-703.
35. Jovin TG, Liebeskind DS, Gupta R, et al. Imaging-based endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke due to proximal intracranial anterior circulation occlusion treated beyond 8 hours from time last seen well: retrospective multicenter analysis of 237 consecutive patients. Stroke 2011;42:2206-11.
36. Leslie-Mazwi TM, Chandra RV, Mehta BP, et al. eds. Intraprocedural duration is the most significant time interval for patient outcomes after acute intra-arterial therapy in stroke. International Stroke Conference; New Orleans, 2012.
37. Riedel CH, Zimmermann P, Jensen-Kondering U, et al. The importance of size: successful recanalization by intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior stroke depends on thrombus length. Stroke 2011;42:1775-7.
38. Kim EY, Heo JH, Lee SK, et al. Prediction of thrombolytic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke using thin-section noncontrast CT. Neurology 2006;67:1846-8. (Pubitemid 44900765)
39. Puig J, Pedraza S, Demchuk A, et al. Quantification of thrombus hounsfield units on noncontrast CT predicts stroke subtype and early recanalization after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:90-6.
40. Bang OY, Saver JL, Kim SJ, et al. Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693-9.
41. Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, et al. A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: an alliance for quality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:97-104. (Pubitemid 351459373)
42. Suzuki S, Saver JL, Scott P, et al. Access to intra-arterial therapies for acute ischemic stroke: an analysis of the US population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1802-6. (Pubitemid 44123711)
43. California Acute Stroke Pilot Registry (CASPR) Investigators. Prioritizing interventions to improve rates of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005;64:654-9.
44. Kleindorfer D, Khoury J, Broderick JP, et al. Temporal trends in public awareness of stroke: warning signs, risk factors, and treatment. Stroke 2009;40:2502-6.
45. Saver JL. Endovascular recanalization in acute ischemic stroke: regionalized organization of care. Neurology 2012;79(13 Suppl 1):S3-4.
46. Nazliel B, Starkman S, Liebeskind DS, et al. A brief prehospital stroke severity scale identifies ischemic stroke patients harboring persisting large arterial occlusions. Stroke 2008;39:2264-7.
47. Alberts MJ, Latchaw RE, Selman WR, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke 2005;36:1597-616. (Pubitemid 40973803)
48. Prabhakaran S, Ward E, John S, et al. Transfer delay is a major factor limiting the use of intra-arterial treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1626-30.
49. Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, et al. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:849-77.
50. Costalat V, Machi P, Lobotesis K, et al. Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the solitaire device: a prospective 50-patient single-center study: timing, safety, and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929-35.
51. Eesa M, Menon BK, Hill MD, et al. Achieving faster recanalization times by IA thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: where should we direct our efforts? Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:228-34.
52. Miley JT, Memon MZ, Hussein HM, et al. A multicenter analysis of 'time to microcatheter' for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2011;21:159-64.
53. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Webster TR, et al. Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation 2006;113:1079-85.
54. Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, et al. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke 2010;41:1175-9.
55. Jumaa MA, Zhang F, Ruiz-Ares G, et al. Comparison of safety and clinical and radiographic outcomes in endovascular acute stroke therapy for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion with intubation and general anesthesia versus the nonintubated state. Stroke 2010;41:1180-4.
56. Ribo M, Flores A, Rubiera M, et al. Difficult catheter access to the occluded vessel during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg Published Online First: 31 Oct 2012.
57. Theron J, Guimaraens L, Casasco A, et al. Radial approach in the treatment of supraaortic arterial lesions. Interv Neuroradiol 2007;13:133-44.
58. Nii K, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M, et al. Direct carotid puncture for the endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1502-4. (Pubitemid 44260138)
59. Guimaraens L, Theron J, Casasco A, et al. Carotid artery stenting by direct percutaneous puncture. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:249-51.
60. Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, et al. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1099-107.
61. Jankowitz B, Aghaebrahim A, Zirra A, et al. Manual aspiration thrombectomy: adjunctive endovascular recanalization technique in acute stroke interventions. Stroke 2012;43:1408-11.
62. White C, Brugera C, Hirsch J. The neurointerventionalist and the AdvaMed code of ethics: examining the doctor-device industry relationship. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:204-6.