Literature review writing: How information is selected and transformed

Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 303-325

  Jaidka, Kokil ^a   Khoo, Christopher S G ^a   Na, Jin Cheon ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Information; Information extraction; Information science; Information searches; Information selection; Literature review writing; Multi document summarization

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; INFORMATION SEARCH; INFORMATION SELECTION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTI-DOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION;

ABSTRACTING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84878262514     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00012531311330665     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Psychological Association (2010), Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
2. Chubin, D., Moitra, S. (1975), "Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting?" in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 423-441.
3. Cremmins, E. (1992), The Art of Abstracting, Information Resources Press, Arlington, VA.
4. Cronin, B., Shaw, D. (2002), "Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place" in Scientometrics, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 31-49.
5. Endres-Niggemeyer, B., Maier, E., Sigel, A. (1995), "How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting: Four core working steps of an expert abstractor" in Information Processing and Management, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 631-674.
6. Hart, C. (1998), Doing a Literature Review, Sage, London.
7. Hyland, K. (2003), "Self-citation and self-reference: credibility and promotion in academic publication" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 251-259.
8. Jaidka, K., Khoo, C., Na, J.-C. (2010), "Imitating human literature review writing: an approach to multi-document summarization" in pp. 116-119, Proceedings of the ICADL (International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries) in Surfer's Paradise, Australia, 2010, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
9. Jaidka, K., Khoo, C., Na, J.-C. (2011), "Literature review writing: a study of information selection from cited papers" in pp. 467-477, Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference On Library and Information Education and Practice 2011 (A-LIEP2011): Issues, Challenges and Opportunities in Pullman Putrajaya Lakeside, Malaysia.
10. Jaidka, K., Khoo, C., Na, J.-C. (n.d.), "Building an argument: rhetorical functions in literature reviews of information science papers".
11. Jing, H., McKeown, K. (1999), "The decomposition of human-written summary sentences" in Gey, F. (Ed.), pp. 129-136, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, 1999, ACM, New York, NY.
12. Khoo, C., Na, J.-C., Jaidka, K. (2011), "Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews" in Online Information Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 255-271.
13. Kwan, B. (2006), "The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics" in English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 30-55.
14. Nanba, H., Kando, N. (2000), "Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types" in Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 2640-2649.
15. Pho, P. (2008), "Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance" in Discourse Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 231-250.
16. Swales, J. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, London.
17. Schleppegrell, M. (2004), The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Teufel, S. (1999), "Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text", PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
19. Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., Kohli, R. (2000), "Internet recommendation systems" in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 363-375.
20. Baeza-Yates, R., Calderón-Benavides, L., González-Caro, C. (2006), "The intention behind web queries" in Proceedings of the String Processing and Information Retrieval, Spire, Glasgow, pp. 98-109.
21. Balabanovic, M., Shoham, Y. (1997), "Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation" in Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 66-72.
22. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008), "Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar" in Scientometrics, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 257-271.
23. Barzilay, R., Elhadad, M. (1997), "Using lexical chains for text summarization" in Mani, I. and Maybury, M. (Eds.), pp. 10-17, in proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization in Madrid, Spain, 1997, ACM.
24. Bourner, T. (1996), "The research process: four steps to success" in Greenfield, T. (Ed.), Research Methods: Guidance for Postgraduates, Arnold, London, pp. 7-11.
25. Desai, M., Spink, A. (2005), "An algorithm to cluster documents based on relevance" in Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1035-1049.
26. Edmundson, H. (1969), "New methods in automatic extracting" in Journal of the ACM, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 264-285.
27. Hargittai, E., Hinnant, A. (2006), "Toward a social framework for information seeking" in New Directions in Human Information Behavior, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 55-70.
28. Hinchliffe, L.J. (2003), "Having your say in a scholarly way" in Research Strategies, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 163-164.
29. Khan, K., Locatis, C. (1998), "Searching through cyberspace: the effects of link display and link density on information retrieval from hypertext on the world wide web" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 176-182.
30. Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., Chen, F. (1995), "A trainable document summarizer" in Fox, E., Ingwersen, P. and Fidel, R. (Eds.), pp. 68-73, proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, 1995, ACM.
31. Lehtokangas, R., Airio, E. (2002), "Translation via a pivot language challenges direct translation in CLIR", Proceedings of the SIGIR 2002 Workshop: Cross-language Information Retrieval: A Research Roadmap, August.
32. Marchionini, G. (1989), "Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 54-66.
33. Ou, S., Khoo, C., Goh, D.H. (2007), "Design and development of a concept-based multi-document summarization system for research abstracts" in Journal of Information Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 308-326.
34. Paice, C. (1990), "Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects" in Information Processing and Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 171-186.
35. Resnik, P., Oard, D., Levow, G. (2001), "Improved cross-language retrieval using backoff translation" in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pp. 1-3, March.
36. Saito, H., Miwa, K. (2001), "A cognitive study of information seeking processes in the WWW: the effects of searcher's knowledge and experience" in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, 2001, Vol. 1, IEEE, New York, NY, pp. 321-327, December.
37. Teufel, S., Moens, M. (2002), "Summarizing scientific articles - experiments with relevance and rhetorical status" in Computational Linguistics, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 409-445.