An algorithm to cluster documents based on relevance

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1035-1049

  Desai, Monica ^a   Spink, Amanda ^b  

^a The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISPLAY DEVICES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); QUERY LANGUAGES; SEARCH ENGINES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CLUSTER DOCUMENTS; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; INTERFACE DISPLAYS; SEARCH QUERIES;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 16244380765     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cutler, M., Shih, Y., & Meng, W. (1997). Using the structure of HTML documents to improve retrieval. In Proceedings of the USENIX symposium on internet technologies and systems (pp. 241-251)
2. H. Greisdorf, and A. Spink Median measure: An approach to IR systems evaluation Information Processing & Management 37 2001 843 857
3. Hearst, M. A., & Pedersen, J. O. (1996). Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual international ACM SIGIR conference (pp. 76-84)
4. G.R. Notess Rising relevance in search engines Online 23 3 1999 84 86
5. Rapela, J. (2001). Automatically combining ranking heuristics for HTML documents. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on web information and data management ACM press (pp. 61-67)
6. Rees, A. M., & Schultz, D. G. (1967). A Field Experimental Approach to the Study of Relevance Assessments in Relation to Document Searching. NSF Report
7. L. Schamber Relevance and information behavior Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 29 1994 3 48
8. Sormunen, E. (2002). Liberal relevance criteria of TREC-counting on negligible documents? In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 36, 324-330
9. D. Sperber, and D. Wilson Relevance: Communication and Cognition 1986
10. A. Spink, and H. Greisdorf Users' partial relevance judgments during online searching Online & CD-ROM Review 21 5 1997 271 280
11. A. Spink, and H. Greisdorf Regions and levels: measuring and mapping users' relevance judgments Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 2 2001 161 173
12. A. Spink, H. Greisdorf, and J. Bateman From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance Information Processing & Management 34 1998 599 622
13. E. Sormunen, J. Kekalainen, J. Koivisto, and K. Jarvelin Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structure queries Journal of Documentation 57 3 2001 358 374
14. P. Wallis, and J.A. Thom Relevance judgments for assessing recall Information Processing & Management 32 1996 273 286
15. P. Willett Recent trends in hierarchical document clustering: a critical review Information Processing & Management 24 5 1998 577 597