Robotic mechanical localization of prostate cancer correlates with magnetic resonance imaging scans

Yonsei Medical Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 907-911

  Shin, Tae Young ^a   Kim, Yeong Jin ^b   Lim, Sey Kiat ^a   Kim, Jung ^b   Rha, Koon Ho ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Elasticity; MRI scans; Prostate cancer; Robotics

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELASTICITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC INDENTATION SYSTEM; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE MAPPING; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

DIAGNOSIS; ELASTICITY; MRI SCANS; PROSTATE CANCER; ROBOTICS;

AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84878254099     PISSN: 05135796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.907     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:212-36.
2. Borden LS Jr, Wright JL, Kim J, Latchamsetty K, Porter CR. An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men. BJU Int 2007;99:559-63.
3. Gosselaar C, Roobol MJ, van den Bergh RC, Wolters T, Schröder FH. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2009;55:139-46.
4. Yossepowitch O. Digital rectal examination remains an important screening tool for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54:483-4.
5. Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, Murphy GP. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991;67: 2949-58.
6. Bozeman CB, Carver BS, Caldito G, Venable DD, Eastham JA. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL. Urology 2005;66:803-7.
7. Park KK, Chung MS, Chung SY, Kim JH, Chung BH. Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer. Yonsei Med J 2013;54:81-6.
8. Ahn B, Lorenzo EI, Rha KH, Kim HJ, Kim J. Robotic palpation-based mechanical property mapping for diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Endourol 2011;25:851-7.
9. Remzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M, Anagnostou T, Seitz C, Waldert M, et al. The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1256-60.
10. Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Dobrovits M, Fakhari M, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol 2001;166:1679-83.
11. Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:021020.
12. Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O. A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response. Med Image Anal 2007;11:361-73.
13. Nava A, Mazza E, Furrer M, Villiger P, Reinhart WH. In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver. Med Image Anal 2008;12:203-16.
14. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, Schulman C, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2007;52:1309-22.
15. Bonekamp D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R, Stoianovici D, Macura KJ. Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics 2011;31:677-703.
16. Lattouf JB, Grubb RL 3rd, Lee SJ, Bjurlin MA, Albert P, Singh AK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007;99:1041-6.
17. Stoianovici D, Song D, Petrisor D, Ursu D, Mazilu D, Muntener M, et al. "MRI Stealth" robot for prostate interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007;16:241-8.