Robotic palpation-based mechanical property mapping for diagnosis of prostate cancer

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 851-857

  Ahn, Bummo ^a   Lorenzo, Enrique Ian S ^b   Rha, Koon Ho ^b   Kim, Hyung Joo ^c   Kim, Jung ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER TISSUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC PALPATION SYSTEM; ROBOTICS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; AGED; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PALPATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 79957589366     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0468     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2008.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.
3. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology 1995;45:70-74.
4. Mettlin C, Lee F, Draep J, et al. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991;67:2949-2958.
5. Borden LS, Jr., Wright JL, Kim J, et al. An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason-7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: A prospective study of 790 men. Br J Urol 2006;99:559-563.
6. Yossepowitch O. Digital rectal examination remains an important screening tool for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54: 483-484.
7. Carvalhal GF, Smith DS, Mager DE, et al. Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levles of 4ng/mL or less. J Urol 1999;161:835-839. (Pubitemid 29422378)
8. Gosselaar C, Roobol MJ, Roderick R, et al. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer-a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2009;55:139-147.
9. Bozeman CB, Carver BS, Caldito G, et al. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/ml. J Urol 2005;66:803-807. (Pubitemid 41440828)
10. Ramon J, Denis LJ. Prostate Cancer: Recent Results in Cancer Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2007.
11. Gosselaar C, Roobol MJ, Roemeling S, et al. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: The impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics. Prostate 2006;67:154-161.
12. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: Results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994;151: 1308-1309.
13. Smith DS, Catalona WJ, Herschman JD. Longitudinal screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:1309-1315. (Pubitemid 26346930)
14. Dario P, Bergamasco M. An advanced robot system for automated diagnostic tasks through palpation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988;35:118-126. (Pubitemid 18079548)
15. Bicchi A, Canepa G, Rossi DD, et al. A sensorized minimally invasive surgery tool for detecting tissutal elastic properties. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, April, 1996, pp. 884- 888.
16. Scilingo EP, Rossi DD, Bicchi A, et al. Haptic display for replication of rheological behavior of surgical tissues: Modelling, control and experiments. In Proceeding of the ASME Dynamics, Systems and Control Division. 1997, pp. 173-176.
17. Ahn B, Kim J. Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations. Med Image Anal 2010;14:138-148.
18. Tiziana SL, Ornella C, Silke K, et al. Mechanical properties of single living cells encapsulated in polyelectrolyte matrixes. J Biotechnol 2006;124:723-731.
19. Ahn B, Kim J, Lorenzo I, et al. Mechanical property characterization of prostate cancer using a minimally motorized indenter in an ex vivo indentation experiment. Urology 2010;76:1007-1011.
20. Schroder EH, Hermanck P, Denis L, et al. The TNM classification of prostate cancer. Prostate 1992;4 (Suppl):129-138.
21. Nava A, Mazza E, Furrer M, et al. In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver. Med Image Anal 2008;12:203-216. (Pubitemid 351494759)
22. Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, et al. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:1-17.
23. Valtorta D, Mazza E. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device. Med Image Anal 2005;9:481-490. (Pubitemid 41179344)