Erratum to: Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian (Behav Res, 10.3758/s13428-012-0263-4);Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 440-461

  Montefinese, Maria ^a   Ambrosini, Ettore ^a   Fairfield, Beth ^a   Mammarella, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Conceptual representations; Feature listing; Semantic norms; Significance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878244138     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0291-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (97)

1. Ashcraft, M. H. (1978). Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 155-164. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(78)90119-6.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X99002149.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 59. 103006. 093639.
4. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3.
5. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46. doi: 10. 1037/h0027577.
6. Berkhin, P. (2006). Survey of clustering data mining techniques. In J. Kogan, C. K. Nicholas, & M. Teboulle (Eds.), Grouping multidimensional data: Recent advances in clustering (pp. 25-71). New York: Springer. doi: 10. 1007/3-540-28349-8_2.
7. Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2005). Corpus e lessico di frequenza dell'italiano scritto (CoLFIS) [Corpus and frequency lexicon for written Italian]. Retrieved from www. istc. cnr. it/material/database/colfis.
8. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
9. Bourne, L. E., Jr., & Restle, F. (1959). Mathematical theory of concept identification. Psychological Review, 66, 278-296. doi: 10. 1037/h0041365.
10. Bueno, S., & Megherbi, H. (2009). French categorization norms for 70 semantic categories and comparison with van Overschelde et al.'s (2004) English norms. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1018-1028. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 4. 1018.
11. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34. doi: 10. 1162/089892998563752.
12. Casey, P. J. (1992). A reexamination of the roles of typicality and category dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 823-834. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 18. 4. 823.
13. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1.
14. Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C., & McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 643-658. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 32. 4. 643.
15. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132, 163-201. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 132. 2. 163.
16. Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23, 371-414. doi: 10. 1016/S0364-0213(99)00005-1.
17. De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Dry, M. J., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2008). Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1030-1048. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 40. 4. 1030.
18. Dell'Acqua, R., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588-615. doi: 10. 3758/BF03200832.
19. Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 1042-1048. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 42. 4. 1042.
20. Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-94. doi: 10. 1162/089892998563798.
21. Dry, M. J., & Storms, G. (2009). Similar but not the same: A comparison of the utility of directly rated and feature-based similarity measures for generating spatial models of conceptual data. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 889-900. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 3. 889.
22. Duncan, C. P. (1977). Effects of frequency on retrieval from a semantic category. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 57-59.
23. Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 120, 339-357. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 120. 4. 339.
24. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
25. Funnell, E. (1995). Objects and properties: A study of the breakdown of semantic memory. Memory, 3, 497-518. doi: 10. 1080/09658219508253162.
26. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125-174. doi: 10. 1080/02643290042000053.
27. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 113, 256-281. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 113. 2. 256.
28. Glass, A. L., & Meany, P. J. (1978). Evidence for two kinds of low-typical instances in a categorization task. Memory & Cognition, 6, 622-628. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198252.
29. Graves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S., & Gordon, J. K. (2007). A neural signature of phonological access: Distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 617-631. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2007. 19. 4. 617.
30. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 27, 377-396. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X04000093.
31. Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 441-461. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(79)90246-9.
32. Hampton, J. A. (2007). Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness. Cognitive Science, 31, 355-384.
33. Hampton, J. A., Dubois, D., & Yeh, W. (2006). Effects of classification context on categorization in natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1431-1443. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195908.
34. Hampton, J. A., & Gardiner, M. M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 491-516. doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8295. 1983. tb01882. x.
35. Heit, E., & Barsalou, L. W. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural language categories. Memory, 4, 413-451.
36. Hernández-Muñoz, N., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2006). Cognitive aspects of lexical availability. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 730-755. doi: 10. 1080/09541440500339119.
37. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object-recognition: On the multiplicity of "category-specific" deficits in neuropsychological populations. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
38. Izura, C., Hernández-Muñoz, N., & Ellis, A. W. (2005). Category norms for 500 Spanish words in five semantic categories. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 385-397. doi: 10. 3758/BF03192708.
39. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Keller, D., & Kellas, G. (1978). Typicality as a dimension of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 78-85. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 4. 1. 78.
42. Koivisto, M., & Laine, M. (1999). Strategies of semantic categorization in the cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 66, 341-357. doi: 10. 1006/brln. 1998. 2033.
43. Kremer, G., & Baroni, M. (2011). A set of semantic norms for German and Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 97-109. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0028-x.
44. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 99. 1. 22.
45. Larochelle, S., & Pineau, H. (1994). Determinants of response times in the semantic verification task. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 796-823. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1994. 1038.
46. López-Chávez, J., & Strassburger Frías, C. (1987). Otro cálculo del índice de disponibilidad léxica [Another index for calculating lexical availability]. In Presente, y perspectiva de la investigación computacional en México: Actas del IV Simposio de la Asociación Mexicana de Lingüística Aplicada. Mexico City: UNAM.
47. Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558-564. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 2. 558.
48. Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 250-269. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(84)90170-1.
49. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 517-535. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1993. 1027.
50. Markman, A. B., & Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 54-70. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 23. 1. 54.
51. Marques, J. F. (2007). The general/specific breakdown of semantic memory and the nature of superordinate knowledge: Insights from superordinate and basic-level feature norms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 879-903. doi: 10. 1080/02643290701789436.
52. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201. doi: 10. 1016/S0959-4388(00)00196-3.
53. McCloskey, M. (1980). The stimulus familiarity problem in semantic memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 485-502. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(80)90330-8.
54. McFarland, C. E., Jr., Duncan, E. M., & Kellas, G. (1978). Isolating the typicality effect in semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 251-262. doi: 10. 1080/14640747808400673.
55. McFarland, C. E., Jr., Kellas, G., Klueger, K., & Juola, J. (1974). Category similarity, instance dominance, and categorization time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 698-708. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(74)80056-3.
56. McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 211-249). Hove: Psychology Press.
57. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 37, 547-559. doi: 10. 3758/BF03192726.
58. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Westmacott, R., & de Sa, V. R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 360-373. doi: 10. 1037/h0087323.
59. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 126, 99-130. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 126. 2. 99.
60. McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43-65. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(90)90009-O.
61. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-115. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ps. 32. 020181. 000513.
62. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 65-79. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 34. 1. 65.
64. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2002). The emergence of category-specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 115-145). Hove: Psychology Press.
65. Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.
66. Osherson, D. N., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., López, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 97. 2. 185.
67. Pexman, P., Hargreaves, I., Siakaluk, P., Bodner, G., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 161-167. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 1. 161.
68. Plaut, D. C. (2002). Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 603-639. doi: 10. 1080/02643290244000112.
69. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205-235. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 111. 1. 205.
70. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
71. Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111-144). New York: Academic Press.
72. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192-233. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 104. 3. 192.
73. Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49). London: Academic Press.
74. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
75. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
76. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X.
77. Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., & Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 506-515. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195597.
78. Saffran, E. M., & Sholl, A. (1999). Clues to the functional and neural architecture of word meaning. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 241-271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Sartori, G., Gnoato, F., Mariani, I., Prioni, S., & Lombardi, L. (2007). Semantic relevance, domain specificity and the sensory/functional theory of category specificity. Neuropsychologia, 45, 966-976. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2006. 08. 028.
80. Sartori, G., & Lombardi, L. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 439-452. doi: 10. 1162/089892904322926773.
81. Sartori, G., Lombardi, L., & Mattiuzzi, L. (2005). Semantic relevance best predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 43, 754-770. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2004. 08. 001.
82. Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., & Ahn, W. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189-228. doi: 10. 1016/S0364-0213(99)80039-1.
83. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
84. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241. doi: 10. 1037/h0036351.
85. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129-169. doi: 10. 1006/cogp. 2001. 0754.
86. Storms, G. (2001). Flemish category norms for exemplars of 39 categories: A replication of the Battig and Montague (1969) category norms. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 145-168.
87. Storms, G., De Boeck, P., & Ruts, W. (2000). Prototype and exemplar-based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 51-73. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1999. 2669.
88. Storms, G., De Boeck, P., van Mechelen, I., & Ruts, W. (1996). The dominance effect in concept conjunctions: Generality and interaction aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1266-1280. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 22. 5. 1266.
89. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2004). The interplay between distinctiveness and intercorrelation in the automatic activation of word meaning. In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society (Vol. 9, p. 109). Austin: Psychonomic Society.
90. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
91. van Dantzig, S., Cowell, R. A., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2011). A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 145-154. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0038-8.
92. van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289-335. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2003. 10. 003.
93. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Damian, M. F., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cognition, 85, B61-B69. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(02)00107-5.
94. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic system hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogpsych. 2003. 09. 001.
95. Vigliocco, G., Warren, J., Siri, S., Arciuli, J., Scott, S., & Wise, R. (2006). The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1790-1796. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhj115.
96. Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 183-190. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 40. 1. 183.
97. Zannino, G. D., Perri, R., Pasqualetti, P., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, A. G. (2006). Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 515-540. doi: 10. 1080/02643290542000067.