French categorization norms for 70 semantic categories and comparison with Van Overschelde et al.'s (2004) English norms

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1018-1028

  Bueno, Steve ^a   Megherbi, Hakima ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74949116384     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BALOTA, D. A., FERRARO, F. R., & CONNOR, L. T. (1991). On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In P.3. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meaning (pp. 187-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph, 80,1-46.
3. BUENO, S., & FRENCK-MESTRE, C. (2002). Rapid activation of the lexicon: A further investigation with behavioral and computational results. Brain & Language, 81, 120-130.
4. BUENO, S., & FRENCK-MESTRE, C. (2008). The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands. Memory & Cognition, 36, 882-898.
5. CHARLES, A., & TARDIEU, H. (1977). Tables, defréquence des éléments de 28 categories [Frequencies database for exemplars of 28 categories]. Paris: Université René Descartes, Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale.
6. COHEN, B. H., BOUSFIELD, W.A., & WHITEMARSH, G.A. (1957). Cultural norms for verbal items in 43 categories (Tech. Rep. 22). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
7. CORDIER, F. (1980). Gradients de prototypic pour 5 categories sémantiques [Degrees of prototype for 5 semantic categories]. Psychologie Française, 25,211-219.
8. CORDIER, F. (2002). Les théories conceptuelles [Theories of concepts]. In F. Cordier & J. François (Eds.), Langage et catégorisation (pp. 125-144). Paris: Hermes.
9. CREE, G. S., & McRAE, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
10. DEHAENE, S., NACCACHE, L., La CLEC'H, G., KOECHLIN, B., MUELLER, M., DEHAENE-LAMBERTZ, O., ET AL. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395,597-600.
11. DENIS, M. (1978). Normes catégorielles pour un échantillon de 16 tennes généraux [Norms for a sample of 16 categories]. Paris: Université de Paris 8.
12. DUBOIS, D. (1983). Analyse de 22 categories séniantiques du français: Organisation catégorielle, lexique et représentation [An analysis of 22 French semantic categories: Categorical organization, lexicon and representation]. L'Année psychologique, 83,465-489.
13. FERRAND, L, & ALARIO, F. X. (1998). Nones d'associations verbales pour 366 noms d'objets concrets [Word association norms for 366 names of objects]. L'Année Psychologique, 98,657-709.
14. GRAINGER, I., & FRENCK-MESTRE, C. (1998). Masked priming by translation equivalents in bilinguals. Language & Cognitive Pvcesses, 13, 601-623.
15. IMBS, P., MARTÍ́N, R., & CENTRE DE RECHERCHE POUR UN TRE7acute;OR DE LA LANGUE FRANçAISE (1971). Dictionnaire desfréquences [Dictionary of frequencies]. Paris: Didier.
16. LÉGER, L., BOUMLAK, H., & TUUS, C. (2008). BASETY: Extension et typicalité des exemplaires pour2l categories d'objets [BASETY: Extension and typicality of the specimens for 21 categories of objects]. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62,223-232.
17. LUO, L., & CRAIK, F. L. M. (2008). Aging and memory: A cognitive approach. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53,346-353.
18. MALT, B. C., SLOMAN, S. A., & GENNARI, S. (2003). Universality and language specificity in object naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 49,20-42.
19. MARCHAL, A., & NICHOLAS, S. (2003). Normes deproduction cátegorielle pour 38 categories sémantiques: Etude sur des sujets jeunes et âgés [Category generation norms for 38 semantic categories in young and older subjects]. L'Année Psychologlque, 103,313-366.
20. MASSON, M. B. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 21,3-23.
21. MCRAE, K., & BOISVERT, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 24,558-572.
22. MCRAE, K., CREE, O.S., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCNORGAN, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms fora large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37,547-559.
23. NEELY, I. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and théories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. PLAUT, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 17,37-42.
25. PLAUT, D.C., & BOOTH, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107,786-823.
26. QUINN, W. M., & KINOSHITA, S. (2008). Congruence effect in semantic categorization with masked primes with narrow and broad categories. Journal of Memory & Language, 58,286-306.
27. TOURRETTE, G. (1979). Table catégorlelles: Normes de production dans 30 catégories sémantiques [Categorical tables: Generation norms for 30 semantic categories]. Poitiers: Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Psychologie.
28. VAN OVERSCHELDE, J. P., RAWSON, K.A., & DUNLOSKY, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory & Language, 50,289-335.
29. YOON, C., FEINBERG, F., Hu, P., GUTCHESS, A. H., HEDDEN, T., CHEN, H.-Y. M., ET AL. (2004). Category norms as a function of culture and age: Comparisons of item responses to 105 categories by American and Chinese adults. Psychology & Aging, 19,379-393.