Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 506-515

  Ruts, Wim ^a   De Deyne, Simon ^a   Ameel, Eef ^a   Vanpaemel, Wolf ^a   Verbeemen, Timothy ^a   Storms, Gert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344279426     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195597     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RUN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46.
3. BORG, I., & GROENEN, P. (1997), Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. BROWN, G. D. A., & WATSON, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.
5. BRYSBAERT, M., LANGE, M., & VAN WIJNENDAELE, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 65-85.
6. BRYSBAERT, M., VAN WIJNENDAELE, I., & DE DEYNE, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica 104, 215-226.
7. BURGESS, C., & LUND, K. (2000). The dynamics of meaning in memory. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 117-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. CENTER FOR LEXICAL INFORMATION (1993). The Celex lexical database. Nijmegen: Author.
9. COHEN, B. H., BOUSFIELD, W. A., & WHITMARSH, G. A. (1957). Cultural norms for verbal items in 43 categories (Tech. Rep. 22). University of Connecticut, Contract No. 631(00), Office of Naval Research.
10. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
11. CREE, G. S., & MCRAE, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
12. DE GROOT, A. M. (1988). Woordassociatienormen met reactietijden [Word associations with reaction times]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie en Haar Grensgebieden, 43, 280-296.
13. DE MOOR, W., GHYSELINCK, M., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2000). A validation study of the age-of-acquisition norms collected by Ghyselinck, De Moor, & Brysbaert. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 99-114.
14. DE WILDE, E., VANOVERBERGHE, V., STORMS, G., & DE BOECK, P. (2003). The instantiation principle re-evaluated. Memory, 11, 533-548.
15. FORSTER, K. I., & CHAMBERS, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
16. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. FROMKIN, V. A., & RODMAN, R. (1998). An introduction to language (6th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. GERHAND, S., & BARRY, C. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592-602.
19. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
20. GHYSELINCK, M., CUSTERS, R., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2003). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2332 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories. Psychologica Belgica, 43-3, 181-241.
21. GHYSELINCK, M., CUSTERS, R., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2004). The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: Further evidence for the semantic hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 550-554.
22. GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1, 944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
23. GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition. reading latencies and auditory recognition. Current Psychological Research, 1, 251-262.
24. HAMPTON, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 441-461.
25. HAMPTON, J. A. (1993). Prototype models of concept representations. In I. Van Mechelen, J. A. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 67-95). London: Academic Press.
26. HAMPTON, J. A., & GARDINER, M. M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 498-516.
27. HEIT, E., & BARSALOU, L. W. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural language categories. Memory, 4, 413-451.
28. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & FORDE, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
29. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (2003). A case series analysis of "category-specific" deficits in living things: The HIT account. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 263-306.
30. KELLER, D., & KELLAS, G. (1978). Typicality as a dimension of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 78-85.
31. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
32. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
33. LANDAUER, T. K., Ross, B. H., & DIDNER, R. S. (1979). Processing visually presented single words: A reaction time analysis [Technical memorandum], Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Laboratories.
34. LAROCHELLE, S., & PINEAU, H. (1994). Determinants of response times in the semantic verification task. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 796-823.
35. MALT, B. C., & JOHNSON, E. C. (1992). Do artifact concepts have cores? Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 195-217.
36. MALT, B. C., & SMITH, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 250-269.
37. MCCLOSKEY, M., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.
38. MCEVOY, C. L., & NELSON, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 581-634.
39. MCRAE, K., DE SA, V. R., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
40. MORRISON, C. M., CHAPPELL, T. D., & ELLIS, A.W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 528-559.
41. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved October 13, 2003, from http://w3.usf.edu/Free Association/.
42. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 104-114.
43. OSHERSON, D. N., SMITH, E. E., WILKIE, O., LÓPEZ, A., & SHAFIR, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200.
44. PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values of 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76 (1, Pt. 2), 1-25.
45. RIPS, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
46. RIPS, L. J., SHOBEN, E. J., & SMITH, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 1-20.
47. ROSCH, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
48. ROSCH, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49). London: Academic Press.
49. ROSCH, E., & MERVIS, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
50. RUTS, W., STORMS, G., & HAMPTON, J. (2004). Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 32, 83-95.
51. SHROUT, P. E., & FLEISS, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Use in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
52. SMITH, J. D., & MINDA, J. P. (2000). Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 3-27.
53. SMITS, T., STORMS, G., ROSSEEL, Y., & DE BOECK, P. (2002). Fruits and vegetables categorized: An application of the generalized context model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 836-844.
54. SPRINGER, K., & KEIL, F. C. (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanisms appropriate to biological and non-biological kinds. Child Development, 62, 767-781.
55. STEYVERS, M., SHIFFRIN, R. M., & NELSON, D. L. (in press). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. Healy (Ed.), Cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer.
56. STORMS, G. (2001). Flemish category norms for exemplars of 39 categories: A replication of the Battig and Montague (1969) category norms. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 145-168.
57. STORMS, G., DE BOECK, P., & RUTS, W. (2000). Prototype and exemplar based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 51-73.
58. STORMS, G., DE BOECK, P., & RUTS, W. (2001). Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: A case study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review; 8, 377-384.
59. STORMS, G., DE BOECK, P., VAN MECHELEN, I., & RUTS, W. (1996). The dominance effect in concept conjunctions: Generality and interaction aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1-15.
60. STORMS, G., RUTS, W., & VANDENBROUCKE, A. (1998). Dominance, overextensions, and the conjunction effect in different syntactic phrasings of concept conjunctions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 337-372.
61. VAN LOON-VERVOORN, W. A. (1989). Eigenschappen van busiswoorden [Features of basic words]. Lisse: Swets und Zeitlinger.
62. VERBEEMEN, T., VANOVERBERGHE, V., STORMS, G., & RUTS, W. (2001). Contrast categories in natural language concepts. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 1-26.
63. WHALEY, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 143-154.