A set of semantic norms for German and Italian

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 97-109

  Kremer, Gerhard ^a   Baroni, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Concept classes; Crosslingual study; Feature production experiment; Parallel norms; Property type annotation; Semantic relations

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; ITALY; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; READING; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953725416     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555-596. doi: 10. 1162/coli. 07-034-R2.
2. Ashcraft, M. H. (1978a). Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 155-164. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(78)90119-6.
3. Ashcraft, M. H. (1978b). Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion. Memory & Cognition, 6(3), 227-232. Available from http://www. psychonomic. org/backissues/17120//mc/vol6-3/mc-6-227. pdf.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 358(1435), 1177-1187. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2003. 1319.
5. Cavagnoli, S., & Nardin, F. (1999). Second language acquisition in South Tyrol: Difficulties, motivations, expectations. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 18(1), 17-46. doi: 10. 1515/mult. 1999. 18. 1. 17.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. doi: 10. 1177/001316446002000104.
7. Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(3), 371-414. doi: 10. 1016/S0364-0213(99)00005-1.
8. Dal Negro, S. (2005). Minority languages between nationalism and new localism: The case of Italy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2005(174), 113-124. doi: 10. 1515/ijsl. 2005. 2005. 174. 113.
9. Forer, D., Paladino, M. P., Vettori, C., & Abel, A. (2008). Il bilinguismo in Alto Adige: Percezioni, osservazioni e opinioni su una questione quanto mai aperta. Il Cristallo - Rassegna di Varia Umanità, Anno L(1), 49-62. Available from http://www. altoadigecultura. org/rivista. html.
10. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(2), 125-174. doi: 10. 1080/02643290125857.
11. Guagnano, D. (2010). Bilingualism and cognitive development: A study on the acquisition of number skills. Doctoral dissertation, Centro Interdipartimentale Mente/Cervello (cimec), Università degli Studi di Trento. Available from http://eprints-phd. biblio. unitn. it/203.
12. Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 441-461. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(79)90246-9.
13. Kremer, G., Abel, A., & Baroni, M. (2008). Cognitively salient relations for multilingual lexicography. In Proceedings of the workshop on cognitive aspects of the lexicon (cogalex2008) (pp 94-101). Manchester, United Kingdom: Coling 2008 Organizing Committee. Available from http://www. aclweb. org/anthology/W08-1913.
14. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547-559. Available from http://brm. psychonomic-journals. org/content/37/4/547.
15. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207-238. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 85. 3. 207.
16. Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K. (2006). The strucplot framework: Visualizing multi-way contingency tables with vcd. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(3), 1-48. Available from http://www. jstatsoft. org/v17/i03.
17. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2002). The emergence of category-specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 115-147). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
18. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89(6), 609-626. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 89. 6. 609.
19. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
20. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81(3), 214-241. doi: 10. 1037/h0036351.
21. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43(2), 129-169. doi: 10. 1006/cogp. 2001. 0754.
22. Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2002). A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: Semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 317-351. doi: 10. 1016/S0911-6044(01)00037-9.
23. Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 183-190. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 40. 1. 183.
24. Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 173-189. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2009. 02. 002.