Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA hip

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 463-471

  Greidanus, Nelson V ^a   Chihab, Samir ^a   Garbuz, Donald S ^a   Masri, Bassam A ^a   Tanzer, Michael ^b   Gross, Allan E ^c   Duncan, Clive P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; ANTEROLATERAL TOTAL HIP ATHROPLASTY; BODY MASS; BONE ANTEVERSION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMORBIDITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIRECT LATERAL TOTAL HIP ATHROPLASTY; FEMALE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTEROLATERAL TOTAL HIP ATHROPLASTY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84878234828     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2603-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bellamy NF, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell JF, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840. (Pubitemid 19037656)
2. Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:248-255. (Pubitemid 39579220)
3. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153-1160. (Pubitemid 46897984)
4. Faisal M, Thomas G, Young SK. Subsidence of the Corail femoral component in the elderly: a retrospective radiological review. Hip Int. 2011;21:325-329.
5. Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, Hildebrand M, Berli MC, Walker MR, Berger RA, Galante JO. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches - a randomized controlled trial. J Biomechanics. 2011;44:372-378.
6. Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, Kuipers BM, Verheyen CC. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:200-208.
7. Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, Ishida T, Iwamoto N, Saito T. Little clinical advantage of modified Watson-Jones approach over modified mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1117-1122.
8. Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Davis AM, Badley EM, Abrahamowicz M, Sherlock L, Williams JI, Anis AH, Esdaile JM. Assessment of health-related quality of life in arthritis: conceptualization and development of five item banks using item response theory. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:33. (Pubitemid 44262649)
9. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-785. (Pubitemid 46564282)
10. Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis. 2011;2011:591253.
11. Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, Fraser BP, Docquier PL. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1362-1372.
12. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701-710. (Pubitemid 40489343)
13. Popischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B. Knahr K. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:328-337.
14. Reininga IH, Zijlstra W, Wagenmakers R, Boerboom AL, Huijbers BP, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:92.
15. Röttinger H. [The MIS anterolateral approach for THA] [in German]. Orthopade. 2006;35:710-715.
16. Toms A, Duncan CP. The limited incision, anterolateral, intermuscular technique for total hip arthroplasty. Inst Course Lect. 2006;55:199-203.
17. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
18. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:387-390. (Pubitemid 38519837)
19. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Shurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacement performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1353-1358. (Pubitemid 38886521)