Factors affecting the practices of external problem solvers in broadcast search

Journal of Technology Management and Innovation

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 166-177

  Corvello, Vincenzo ^a   Iazzolino, Gianpaolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Broadcast search; Contingent factors; Crowdsourcing; Innovation contests; Innovation intermediary; Inventors; Open innovation; Organizational context; Practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878209506     PISSN: None     EISSN: 07182724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-27242013000200014     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. BANERJEE, P.M. and Campbell, B. A. (2009). Inventor bricolage and firm technology research and development. R&D Management, 39, 473-487.
2. BATTISTELLA, C., and Nonino, F. (2013). Exploring the impact of motivations on the attraction of innovation roles in open innovation web-based platforms. Production Planning and Control, 24, 2-3, 226-245.
3. BAYUS, B.L. (2010). Crowdsourcing and individual creativity over time: the detrimental effects of past success. SSRN Quantitative Marketing eJournal. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract01667101.
4. BOIMABEAU, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 2, 45-52+92.
5. BOIMABEAU, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence", MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 2, 45-52.
6. BRABHAM D.C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless, Information, Communication & Society, 13, 8, 1122-1145.
7. BRABHAM, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information Communication and Society, 13, 8, 1122-1145.
8. BREAZEAL, C., DePalma, N., Orkin, J., Chernova, S. and Jung, M. (2013). Crowdsourcing Human-Robot Interaction: New Methods and System Evaluation in a Public Environment, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2, 1, 82-111.
9. CALDERINI, M., Franzoni, C., and Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36, 3, 303-319.
10. CHESBROUGH H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
11. CHESBROUGH H.W., Vanhaverbeke W. and West J. (Eds.) (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. CHESBROUGH, H.W. (2006). Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
13. CORVELLO V., Iazzolino G., Ritrovato V. (2013). Evaluating Technological Innovations: A Method Based on Comparable Transactions, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 56, 37-50.
14. CORVELLO, V. (2013). An empirical study of individual factors affecting the usefulness of internet-based platforms for open innovation in broadcast search processes. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7, 4, 821-829.
15. DE CAROLIS, M., and Corvello, V. (2006). Multiple competences in distributed communities of practice: The case of a community of financial advisors. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 116-125.
16. DEWAR, R.D.; Dutton, E.J. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis Management Science, 32, 11, 1422-1433.
17. DEWBERRY, C. (2004). Statistical Methods for Organizational Research: Theory and Practice. Routledge: New York.
18. DVIR D.; Tzvi Raz T.; Shenharc A.J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management 21, 89-95.
19. EBNER, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R and D Management, 39,4, 342-356.
20. FELLER, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., and O'Reilly, P. (2012). 'Orchestrating' sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21, 3, 216-232.
21. FICHTER, K. (2009). Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in open innovation. R and D Management, 39,4, 357-371.
22. FRANKE, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32, 1, 157-178.
23. FREY K., Leuthje C., Haag S. (2011). Whom Should Firms Attract to Open Innovation Platforms? The Role of Knowledge Diversity and Motivation. Long Range Planning, 44, 397-420.
24. GARCIA, R. and Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110-132.
25. GEORGE, D. and Mallery P. (2000). SPSS For Windows Step by Step, Allyn & Bacon.
26. GIANNOPOULOU, E., Yström, A., Ollila, S., Fredberg, T., Elmquist, M. (2010). Implications of Openness: A Study into (All) the Growing Literature on Open Innovation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5, 3, 162-180.
27. GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. and Bierly, P. (2001). Analyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 2, 107-130.
28. GOULD, R.V. (2012). Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7, 3, 1-11.
29. HARMAN H.H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis (3rd edition). University of Chicago.
30. HUSTON L., Sakkab N. (2006). Connect and Develop - Inside P&Gs new model for Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84, 58-66.
31. IAZZOLINO, G., Migliano, G., and Pantano, E. (2013). A new tool for supporting retailers in advanced technologies risk management, International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7, 4, 652-659.
32. KIM, J. and Park, Y. (2008). The Usefulness of Patent Stage and Sectoral Pattern in Open Innovation Licensing. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 3, 4, 41-51.
33. LEIMEISTER, J.M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing-activation-supporting components for IT-based idea competitions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1, 197-224.
34. LEWRICK, M., Raeside, R. and Peisl, T. (2007). A cross-sector exploration on the influence of social networks and social capital on innovation and success. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2, 3, 38-48.
35. LICHTENTHALER, U. Ernst, H. (2008). Innovation intermediaries: why internet marketplaces for technology have not yet met the expectations. Creativity and innovation management, 17, 1, 14-25.
36. MAHR D., Rindfleisch A., Slotegraaf S. (2010). Innovation Beyond Firm Boundaries: The Routines of Successful External Problem Solvers. Tilburg Conference for Innovation, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
37. MARTINS LEAL W.L. and Coelho A.M. (2006). The Contribution of Communities of Practice in an innovative enterprise. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 1, 4, 22-29.
38. MORTARA, L., Ford, S.J. and Jaeger, M., (2013). Idea Competitions under scrutiny: Acquisition, intelligence or public relations mechanism? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Available online 26 February, ISSN 0040-1625, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.008.
39. MUHDI, L., Daiber, M., Friesike, S., & Boutellier, R. (2011). The crowdsourcing process: An intermediary mediated idea generation approach in the early phase of innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14, 4, 315-332.
40. PANTANO, E. and Corvello, V. (2013). The impact of experience on companies' reactions to negative comments on social networks. Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 14, 214-223.
41. PANTANO, E., Iazzolino, G., and Migliano, G. (2013), Obsolescence risk in advanced technologies for retailing: a management perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 2, 225-233.
42. PHILLIPS, B.S. (1971). Social Research. Strategy and Tactics. Mac Millan, New York.
43. PRANDELLI, E.,Verona, G., and Raccagni, D. (2006). Diffusion of web-based product innovation, California Management Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 109-135.
44. ROUSE, A.C., (2010). A Preliminary Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing. ACIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 76. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010/76.
45. SAXTON, G.D., Oh, O. and Kishore, R., (2013). Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control. Information Systems Management, 30, 1.
46. SHAO, B., Shi, L., Xu, B., & Liu, L. (2012). Factors affecting participation of solvers in crowdsourcing: An empirical study from china. Electronic Markets, 22, 2, 73-82.
47. SUN, Y., Fang, Y., and Lim, K. H. (2012). Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decision Support Systems, 53, 1, 12-22.
48. SUROWIECKI, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. Anchor Books, New York,.
49. TERWIESCH, C., & Xu, Y. (2008). Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54, 9, 1529-1543.
50. TIMM, N.H. (1975). Multivariate analysis with applications in education and psychology. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
51. TRAN, A., Hasan, S., Park, J. (2012). Crowd Participation Pattern in the Phases of a Product Development Process that Utilizes Crowdsourcing, 11, 3, 266-275.
52. VOLPENTESTA, A.P. and AMMIRATO S. (2013). Alternative Agrifood Networks in a regional area: a case study. THE International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 26, 1-2, 55-66.
53. VOLPENTESTA, A.P., Ammirato S, Sofo, F. (2012). Collaborative design learning and thinking style awareness. The international journal of engineering education, 28, 4, 948-958.
54. YANG Z., Qian S., (2012). Construction and Implementation of Distributed Information Resources Allocation System for Collaborative Innovation, AISS: Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 4, 13, 109-117.