Evaluating technological innovations: A method based on comparable transactions

European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences

Volumn , Issue 56, 2013, Pages 37-50

  Corvello, Vincenzo ^a   Iazzolino, Gianpaolo ^a   Ritrovato, Valentina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Comparable transactions; Intangibles; Online intermediaries; Open innovation; Valuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873742287     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14502275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andriessen D. G., 2005. Value, Valuation, and Valorisation, in Swarte S. (eds.), Inspirerend innoveren; meerwaarde door kennis. Den Haag: Kvie.
2. Arora A., Fosfuri A. and Gambardella A. 2001. Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Bianchi T. and Paganelli O. 1992. Valutazione delle aziende e analisi di bilancio, Utet, Torino.
4. Bonaccorsi A. and Giuri P. 2003. Alle radici del ritardo tecnologico italiano, in Bonaccorsi A. (eds.), Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia, F. Angeli, Milano.
5. Carlsson, S., Corvello, V. and Migliarese, P. 2009. Enabling open innovation: Proposal of a framework supporting ICT and KMS implementation in web-based intermediaries. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2009, Verona, 8-10 June 2009, pp. 116-125.
6. Chesbrough H., 2003. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press.
7. Chesbrough H., 2006. Open Business Models. How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business Press, p. 161.
8. Corvello, V. and Migliarese, P. 2007. Virtual forms for the organisation of production: a comparative analysis, International Journal of Production Economics 110(1-2), pp. 5-15.
9. Damodaran A., 2012. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. John Wiley and Sons, NJ.
10. De Carolis, M. and Corvello, V. 2006. Multiple competences in distributed communities of practice: The case of a community of financial advisors. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2006, 4-5 September 2006, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 116-125.
11. Di Pietro, L. and Pantano, E. 2012. An empirical investigation of social network influence on consumer purchasing decision: The case of Facebook, Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 14 (1), pp. 18-29.
12. Dosi G. 1982. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinant and Direction of Technological Change. Research Policy 11(3), pp. 147-162.
13. Dosi G., Marsili O., Orsenigo L. and Salvatore R. 1995. Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures. Small Business Economics 7, pp. pp.411-436
14. European Commission. 2003. Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators, European Commission, Bruxelles.
15. Fredberg, T., Elmquist. M. and Ollila, S. 2008. Managing OI: present findings and future directions. Vinnova.
16. Granstrand O., Patel P., and Pavitt K. 1997. Multi-technology Corporations: Why They Have "Distributed" Rather than "Distinctive Core" Competencies. California Management Review 39(4), pp. 8-18.
17. Grimaldi, M. and Rippa, P. 2011. An AHP-based framework for selecting knowledge management tools to sustain innovation process, Knowledge and Process Management 18 (1), pp. 45-55.
18. Gupta A. K., Tesluk P. E. and Taylor M. S., 2007. Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science 18, (6), pp. 885-897.
19. Iazzolino G. and Pietrantonio R., 2005. A Developing Knowledge Audit Methodology: Evidences from the Public Administration in Southern Italy. Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Communications, Internet, and Information Technology, CIIT 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA, October 31-November 2, pp. 86-90.
20. Iazzolino G. and Fortino A., 2012. Credit Risk analysis and the KMV-Black and Scholes model: a proposal of correction and an empirical analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 9 (2), pp. 167-181.
21. Iazzolino G., Laise D., and Marraro L., 2012. Business multicriteria performance analysis: a tutorial. Benchmarking: An International Journal 19 (3), pp. 395-411.
22. Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R. and Mari, L. 2011. A model for R&D performance measurement International Journal of Production Economics 134, p. p 212-223.
23. Lichtenthaler, U. 2008a. Leveraging technology assets in the presence of markets for knowledge. European Management Journal 26, pp. pp.122-134
24. Lichtenthaler, U. 2008b. Relative capacity: Retaining knowledge outside a firm's boundaries. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 25, pp. 200-212
25. Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H. 2008a. Intermediary services in the markets for technology: organizational antecedents and performance consequences. Organization Studies 29 (07), pp. 1003-1035.
26. Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H. 2008b. Innovation intermediaries: why internet marketplaces for technology have not yet met the expectations. Creativity and innovation management 17 (1), pp. 14-25.
27. Lundvall B. and Johnson B. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1(2), pp. 23-42.
28. Malerba F. and Orsenigo L. 1990. Technological Regimes and Patterns of Innovation: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Italian Case, in Heertje A. and Perlman M. (Eds.), Evolving Technology and Market Structure, Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
29. Malerba F. and Orsenigo L. 1993. Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior, Industrial and Corporate Change 2 (1), 45-71.
30. Marsili O. 1999. Technological Regimes: theory and evidence, ECIS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
31. Migliarese P., Ciborra C. and Romano P. 1984. A Methodological Inquiry of Organizational Noise in Sociotechnical Systems, Human Relations 37(8), pp. 565-588.
32. Migliarese P. and Verteramo S. 2005. Knowledge Creation and Sharing in a Project Team: An Organizational Analysis Based on the Concept of Organizational Relation, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 3(2), pp. 97-106.
33. Narin F., Hamilton K. S. and Olivastro D. 1997. The increasing linkage between U. S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26(3), pp. 317-330.
34. Nelson R. R. and Winter S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, The Belknap Press of Harward University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
35. OECD, 2008. Open Innovation in Global Networks.
36. Pantano, E. and Corvello, V. 2010. Digital contents management for improving consumers' experience. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications 4(7), pp. 8-10.
37. Patel P. and Pavitt K. 1994. The Continuing, Widespread (and Neglected) Importance of Improvements in Mechanical Technologies. Research Policy 23(5), pp. 533-545.
38. Pellegrini, L., Lazzarotti, V. and Pizzurno, E. 2012. From outsourcing to Open Innovation: a case study in the oil industry. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 8 (2), pp. 182-196.
39. Robson M., Townsend J. and Pavitt K., 1988. Sectoral Patterns of Production and Use of Innovations in the UK: 1945-1983. Research Policy 17(1), pp. 1-14.
40. Smit H. T. J. 1996. Growth Options and Strategy Analysis, Ph. D. Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
41. Volpentesta, A. P., Ammirato, S., Sofo, F. 2012. "Collaborative design learning and thinking style awareness, " International Journal of Engineering Education, 28 (4), pp. 948-958.
42. Volpentesta, A. P., and Ammirato S. 2013. Alternative Agrifood Networks in a regional area: a case study. The international journal of computer integrated manufacturing 26 (1-2), pp. 55-66.
43. White, M. A. and Muthusamy, S. K. 2005. Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: a social exchange view Organization Studies, 26 (3), 415-441.
44. Williams, A. D. and Tapscott, D. 2006. Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin Group, New York.