Negotiating the 'trading zone'. Creating a shared information infrastructure in the dutch public safety sector

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Boersma, Kees ^a   Wagenaar, Pieter ^a   Wolbers, Jeroen ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Common operational picture; Emergency response; Nation wide IT system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878174968     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15477355     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/1547-7355.1965     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bharosa, N., Kyu Lee, J., & Janssen, M. (2010). Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1), 49- 65.
2. Boersma, F.K., Groenewegen, P., & Wagenaar, P. (2009). Emergency Response Rooms in Action: an ethnographic case-study in Amsterdam. In Proceeding of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference, 1-8, edited by Landgren J., & S. Jul. Gothenburg: ISCRAM
3. Boulding, K.E. (1989). Three faces of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and Organizations. London: Sage.
6. Coaffee, J., Murakami Wood, D., & Rogers, P. (2009). The Everyday Resilience of the City. How Cities Respond ro Terrorism and Disaster. London/New York: Palgrave/Macmillian
7. Cook, A.H. (2009). Towards an Emergency Response Report Card: Evaluating the Response to the I-35W Bridge Collapse. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6(1).
8. Comfort, L.K., & Kapucu, N. (2006). Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center Attacks, September 11, 2001. National Hazards 39: 309-327.
9. Comfort, Loise K. 2007. Crisis management in Hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67, 189-197.
10. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of Ideas. In Translating Organizational Change, edited by Barbara Czarniawska, and Guje Sevón, 13- 48. New Work: Walter de Gruyter.
11. Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
12. Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations: on power, involvement, and their correlates. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
13. Fedorowicz, J., Gogan, J.L, & Williams, C.B. (2007). A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 785-807.
14. Fewell, M.P., & Hazen, M.G. (2003). Netcentric Warfare, its nature and its modeling, Department of Defence Australia, DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory.
15. Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2004). Approaches to Decentralization and Local Autonomy: A Critical Appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 523- 544.
16. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic. A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
18. Gorman, J.C., Cooke, N.J., & Winner, J.L. (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49 (12-13), 1312-1325.
19. Hardy, C., & Clegg, S.R. (1996). Some Dare Call It Power. In Studying Organization: Theory & Method, edited by Clegg, S.R., & Hardy, C., 368- 387. London: Sage.
20. Helsloot, I. (2007). Voorbij de symboliek. Over de noodzaak van een rationeel perspectief op fysiek veiligheidsbeleid. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
21. Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. London: MacMillan.
22. Houghton, Robert J., Chris Barber, Richard McMaster, Neville A. Stanton, Paul Salmon, Rebecca Stewart and Guy H. Walker. 2006. Command and control in emergency services operations; a social network analysis. Ergonomics 49(12- 13): 10-22.
23. Houghton, R.J., Baber, C., Cowton, M., Walker, G.H., & Stanton, N.A. (2008). WESTT (workload, error, situational awareness, time and teamwork): an analytical prototyping system for command and control. Cognition, Technology and Work, 10, 199-207.
24. Hsu, C.Ed., Chambers, W.C., Herbold, R.J., Calcote, J.S., Ryczak, R.S., & DeFraites, R.F. (2010). Towards Shared Situational Awareness and Actionable Knowledge: An Enhanced, Human-Centered Paradigm for Public Health Information System Design. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1), Article 52.
25. Janssen, M., Lee, J.K., Bharosa, N., & Cresswell, A. (2010). Advances in multiagency disaster management: Key elements in disaster research. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1), 1-7.
26. Johnson, D., Zagorecki, A., Gelman, J.M., & Comfort, L.K. (2011). Improved Situational Awareness in Emergency Management through Automated Data Analysis and Modeling, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), Article 40.
27. Kapucu, N. (2009). Interorganizational Coordination in Complex Environments of Disasters: The Evolution of Intergovernmental Disaster Response Systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1).
28. Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., & Collins, M.J. (2010). Examining Intergovernmental and Interorganizational Response to Catastrophic Disasters: Toward a Network- Centered Approach, Administration & Society, 42(2), 222-247.
29. Kiltz, L., & Smith, R. (2011). Experimenting with GIS in Doing Damage Assessements: A Trail Run at Disaster City. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), Article 22.
30. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London: Mcmillan.
31. Lutz, L.D., & Lindell, M.K. (2008). Incident Command System as a Response Model Within Emergency Operation Centers during Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(3), 122-134.
32. Martin, J.A (2002). Organizational Culture. Mapping the Terrain. London: Sage.
33. Mehalik, M.M., & Gorman, M.E. (2006). A Framework for Strategic Network Design Assessment, Decision Making, and Moral Imagination. Science Technology Human Values, 31(3), 289-308.
34. Mendonça, D., Jefferson, T., & Harrald, J. (2007). Collaborative adhocracies and Mix-and Match Technologies in Emergency Management. Communications of the ACM, 50(3), 45-49.
35. Moynihan, D.P. (2009). The network governance of crisis response: case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, Advance Access published on January 30, 2009. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun033.
36. Oosting, M. (2001). Report Enschede Firework Disaster. Rotterdam: Phoenix & den Oudsten BV
37. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
38. Perrow, C. (2007). The Next Catastrophe. Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
39. Perry, W., Button, R.W., Bracken, J., Sullivan, T., & Mitchell, J. (2002). Measures of effectiveness for the information-age navy: the effects of network-centric operations on combat outcomes. Report MR-1449-NAVY of the RAND Corporation.
40. Pinch, T.J., & Bijker, W.E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 388 - 441.
41. Provan, K.G., & Kenis, P. 2007. Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
42. Provan, K.G., & Brinton Milward, H. (2001). Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414-423.
43. Remkes, J., & Kamp, H. (2006). Rapportage Intensivering Civiel-Militaire Samenwerking [Letter to the Parliament about Civil - Military Collaboration]. Den Haag: Department of the Interior and Ministry of Defense.
44. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Third Edition). New York; The Free Press.
45. Scholtens, A. (2008). Controlled Collaboration in Disaster and Crisis Management in the Netherlands, History and Practice of an Overestimated and Underestimated Concept. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(4), 195-207.
46. Schooley, B.L., & Horan, T.A. (2007). Towards end-to-end governance performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS), Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 755-784.
47. Van Lier, B. (2009). Luhmann ontmoet 'The Matrix'. Uitwisselen en delen van informatie in Netcentrische omgevingen. Delft: Eburon.
48. Vaughan, D. (1999). The role of the Organization in the Production of Techno- Scientific Knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 29(6), 913-943.
49. Vedung, E. (1998). Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation, edited by Bemelmans-Videc, M.J., Rist, R.C., & Vedung, E., 21-58. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
50. Von Lubitz, Dag K.J.E., J.E. Beakley, and F. Patricelli. 2008. Disaster Management: The Structure, Function, and Significance of Network-Centric Operations. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 5(2), article 42: 1-24.
51. Wagenaar, P., Boersma, F.K., Groenewegen, P., & Niemandsverdriet, P. (2009). Implementing C2000 in the Dutch police region 'Hollands-Midden'. In: ICTs, Citizens & Governance: After the Hype!, edited by Meijer, A., Boersma, F.K., & Wagenaar, Amsterdam: IOS Press series "Innovation and the Public Sector", 119-134.
52. Williams, C.B., Dias, M., Fedorowicz, J., Jacobson, D., Vilvovsky, S., Sawyer, S., & Tyworth, M. (2009). The formation of inter-organizational information sharing networks in public safety: Cartographic insights on rational choice and institutional explanations. Information Polity, 14, 13-29.
53. Wright, D.S. (1988). Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
54. Wright, D.S. (1990). Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 168-177.