The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 895-915

  Moynihan, Donald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69149084227     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mun033     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Commission. 2004. Final report of the National Commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2001. Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11:29-326.
3. Bigley, Gregory A., and Karlene H. Roberts. 2001. The incident command system: High reliability organizing for complex and volatile tasks. Academy of Management Journal 44:1281-1299
4. Boin, Arjen, and Paul't Hart. 2003. Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible. Public Administration Review 63:544-53.
5. Buck, Dick A., Joseph E. Trainor, and Benigno E. Aguirre. 2006. A critical evaluation of the incident command system and NIMS. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3: 1-27.
6. Brass, Daniel J., Joseph Galaskiewicz, Henrich R. Greve, and Wenpin Tsai. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47: 795-817.
7. Bringer, Joy D., Lynne H. Johnston, and Celia H. Brackenridge. 2006. Maximizing transparency in a doctoral thesis: The complexities of writing about the use of QSR*NVIVO within a grounded theory study. Qualitative Research Journal 4:247-265
8. Brower, Ralph S., Mitchel Y. Abolafia, and Jered B. Carr. 2000. On improving qualitative methods in public administration research. Administration & Society 32:363-397
9. Cole, Dana. 2000. The incident command system: A 25-year evaluation by California practitioners. Emmitsburg, MD: National Fire Academy.
10. Dynes, Russel R. 1970. Organized Behavior in Disasters. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.
11. Drabek, Thomas E., and David A. McEntire. 2003. Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management 12:97-112.
12. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal 50:25-32.
13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2007. National incident management system-Draft. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-nims.pdf (accessed July 12, 2008).
14. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2004. Case studies and theory development in social science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Hall, Thad E., and Larry J. O' Toole, Jr. 2000. Structures for policy implementation: An analysis of policy implementation 1965-1966 and 1993-1994. Administration & Society 31:667-686
16. Koppenjan, Joop, and Hans-Erik Klijn. 2004. Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Laumann, Edward O., Peter V. Marsden, and David Prensky. 1983. The boundary speci.cation problem in network analysis. In Applied network analysis, eds. R. S. Burt and M. J. Minor, 18-34. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Leonard, Herman B., and Arnold M. Howitt. 2006. Katrina as prelude: Preparing for and responding to Katrina-class disturbances in the United States. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3:1-20.
19. May, Peter J. 2003. Policy design and implementation. In Handbook of public administration, eds. J. Pierre and B. G. Peters, 223-233 London: Sage.
20. May, Peter J., Byran Jones, and Samuel Workman. 2008. Organizing attention: Responses of the bureaucracy to agenda disruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 517-541
21. McGuire, Michael. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review 66 (special issue): 33-43.
22. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Milward, H. Brinton, and Keith G. Provan. 2006. A Manager's guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
24. Mission Centered Solutions. 2003. Southern California .restorm 2003. Report for the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center.
25. Moynihan, Donald P. 2005. Leveraging collaborative networks in infrequent emergency situations. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
26. ---. 2007. From forest .res to hurricane Katrina: Case studies of incident command systems. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
27. ---. 2008. Combining structural forms in the search for policy tools: Incident command systems in U.S. crisis management. Governance 21:205-229
28. Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). 2002. Oklahoma City seven years later: Lessons for other communities. Oklahoma: Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). www.mipt.org/pdf/MIPT-OKC7YearsLater.pdf (accessed February 2, 2007).
29. Oklahoma Department of Civil Emergency Management (ODCEM). n.d. After action report: Alfred P. Murrah federal building bombing 19 April 1995. Oklahoma: Department of Central Services Central Printing Division. www.ok.gov/OEM/documents/Bombing%20After%20Action%20Report.pdf (accessed March 3, 2007).
30. Provan, Keith G., Amy Fish, and Joerg Sydow. 2007. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 33:479-516.
31. Provan, Keith G., and Patrick Kenis. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:229-252
32. Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61:414-423
33. Raab, Jorg. 2002. Where do policy networks come from? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12:581-622.
34. Richards, Lyn. 2002. Rigorous, rapid, reliable and qualitative? Computing in qualitative method. American Journal of Health Behavior 26:425-430
35. Rohde, Michael. 2002. Command decisions during catastrophic urban interface wild.re: A case study of the 1993 Orange County, California, Laguna Fire. Thesis, Department of Occupational Studies, California State Univ. Long Beach, CA
36. Rosenthal, Uriel, Paul't Hart, and Michael T. Charles. 1989. The world of crises and crisis management. In Coping with crises: The management of disasters, riots and terrorism, eds. U. Rosenthal, M. T. Charles, and P. 't Hart, 1-33. Spring.eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
37. Scharpf, Fritz. 1993. Coordination in hierarchies and networks. In Games in hierarchies and networks: Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governance institutions, ed. F. W. Scharpf, 125-166 Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
38. Schoorman, F. David, Roger C. Mayer, and James H. Davis. 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Review 32:34-354.
39. Stallings, Robert A., and E. L. Quarantelli. 1985. Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Administration Review 45 (special issue): 93-100.
40. Tierney, Kathleen, and Joseph Trainor. 2004. Networks and resilience in the World Trade Center disaster. Research Progress and Accomplishments, vol.6. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
41. Titan Systems Corporation. 2002. After action report on the response to the September 11 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon. Report to Arlington County. http://wwwarlingtonva.us/Departments/Fire/Documents/after-report.pdf (accessed June 12, 2006).
42. Trainor, Joseph E. 2004. Searching for a system: Multi-organizational coordination in the September 11th World Trade Center search and rescue response. DRC Preliminary Publication #343 Public Entity Risk Institute. http://www.udel.edu/DRC/Preliminary-Papers/PP343-Searching%20for%20a% 20System%20Paper.pdf (accessed May 23, 2007).
43. US Department of Homeland Security (US DHS). 2004. National incident management system. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
44. U.S. House of Representatives Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Katrina (House Report). 2006. A failure of initiative. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
45. U.S. Senate Committee of Homeland Security and Government Affairs (Senate Report). 2006. Hurricane Katrina: A nation still unprepared. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46. Varley, Pamela. 2003. Command performance: County .refighters take charge of the 9/11 emergency. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government Case Program.
47. Waugh, William L., Jr., and Gregory Streib. 2006. Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review 66 (special issue): 131-140
48. Winter, Søren C. 2003. Implementation: Introduction. In Handbook of public administration, eds. J. Pierre and B. G. Peters, 205-211 London: Sage.