Dryline position errors in experimental convection-allowing NSSL-WRF model forecasts and the operational NAM

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 746-761

  Coffer, Brice E ^a,b,c,d   Maudlin, Lindsay C ^a   Veals, Peter G ^a   Clark, Adam J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING CENTERS; MESO-SCALE MODELS; NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORIES; POSITION ERRORS; SPECIFIC HUMIDITY; SYSTEMATIC BIAS; WEATHER PATTERNS; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODELS;

ERRORS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

ERROR ANALYSIS; FORECASTING METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 84878168131     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: 15200434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-12-00092.1     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Beebe, R. G., 1958: An instability line development as observed by the tornado research airplane. J. Meteor., 15, 278-282.
2. Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004a: An hourly assimilation- forecast cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 495-518.
3. Benjamin, S. G., G. A. Grell, J. M. Brown, T. G. Smirnova, and R. Bleck, 2004b: Mesoscale weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic-terrain-following coordinatemodel.Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 473-494.
4. Betts, A. K., 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677-691.
5. Betts, A. K., and M. J. Miller, 1986: Anew convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX, and Arctic air-mass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693-709.
6. Bluestein, H., 1993: Observations and Theory of Weather Systems. Vol. 2, Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes, Oxford University Press, 594 pp.
7. Bothwell, P. D., J. A. Hart, and R. L. Thompson, 2002: An integrated three-dimensional objective analysis scheme in use at the Storm Prediction Center. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms/19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/ 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., JP3.1. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/47482.pdf.]
8. Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land-surface- hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569-585.
9. Clark, A. J., W. A. Gallus Jr., M. Xue, and F. Kong, 2009: A comparison of precipitation forecast skill between small convection-allowing and large convection-parameterizing ensembles. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1121-1140.
10. Clark, A. J., W. A. Gallus Jr., M. Xue, and F. Kong, 2010: Growth of spread in convectionallowing and convection-parameterizing ensembles. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 594-612.
11. Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2011: Probabilistic precipitation forecast skill as a function of ensemble size and spatial scale in a convectionallowing ensemble. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1410-1418.
12. Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2012: An overview of the 2010 Hazardous Weather Testbed Experimental Forecast Program Spring Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 55-74.
13. Coniglio, M. C., K. L. Elmore, J. S. Kain, S. J. Weiss, M. Xue, and M. L. Weisman, 2010: Evaluation of WRF model output for severe-weather forecasting from the 2008 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Experiment. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 408-427.
14. Coniglio, M. C., J. Correia, P. T. Marsh, and F. Kong, 2013: Verification of convection-allowing WRF model forecasts of the planetary boundary layer using sounding observations. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 842-862.
15. Crawford, T. M., and H. B. Bluestein, 1997: Characteristics of dryline passage. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 463-477.
16. Dodd, A. V., 1965: Dewpoint distribution in the contiguous United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 93, 113-122.
17. Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale twodimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077-3107.
18. Fels, S. B., and M. D. Schwarzkopf, 1975: The simplified exchange approximation: A new method for radiative transfer calculations. J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1475-1488.
19. Ferrier, B. S., Y. Jin, Y. Lin, T. Black, E. Rogers, and G. Dimego, 2002: Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and rainfall scheme in the NCEP Eta Model. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 280-283.
20. Fujita, T. T., 1958: Structure and movement of a dry front. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 39, 574-582.
21. Geerts, B., 2008: Dryline characteristics near Lubbock, Texas, based on radar and West Texas Mesonet data for May 2005 and May 2006. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 392-406.
22. Hane, C. E., 2004: Quiescent and synoptically-active drylines: A comparison based upon case studies. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 86, 195-211.
23. Hane, C. E., C. L. Ziegler, and H. B. Bluestein, 1993: Investigation of the dryline and convective storms initiated along the dryline: Field experiments during COPS-91. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 2133-2145.
24. Hane, C. E., M. E. Baldwin, H. B. Bluestein, T. M. Crawford, and R. M. Rabin, 2001: A case study of severe storm development along a dryline within a synoptically active environment. Part I: Dryline motion and an Eta Model forecast. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2183-2204.
25. Hoch, J., and P. Markowski, 2005: A climatology of springtime dryline position in the U.S. Great Plains region. J. Climate, 18, 2132-2137.
26. Hong, S.-Y., and J.-O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129-151.
27. Hoskins, B. J., and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11-37.
28. Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945.
29. Janjić, Z. I., 2002: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso Model. NCEP Office Note 437, 61 pp.
30. Janjić, Z. I., 2003: A nonhydrostatic model based on a new approach. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 271-285.
31. Johnson, A., X. Wang, F. Kong, and M. Xue, 2011a: Hierarchical cluster analysis of a convection-allowing ensemble during the Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. Part I: Development of the object-oriented cluster analysis method for precipitation fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3673-3693.
32. Johnson, A., X. Wang, M. Xue, and F. Kong, 2011b: Hierarchical cluster analysis of a convection-allowing ensemble during the Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. Part II: Ensemble clustering over the whole experiment period. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3694-3710.
33. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2008: Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931-952.
34. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2010a: Assessing advances in the assimilation of radar data and other mesoscale observations within a collaborative forecasting-research environment. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1510-1521.
35. Kain, J. S., S. R.Dembek, S. J. Weiss, J. L. Case, J. J. Levit, and R. A. Sobash, 2010b: Extracting unique information from highresolution forecast models: Monitoring selected fields and phenomena every time step. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1536- 1542.
36. Lacis, A. A., and J. E. Hansen, 1974: A parameterization for the absorption of solar radiation in the earth's atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 118-133.
37. Lean, H. W., P. A. Clark, M. Dixon, N. M. Roberts, A. Fitch, R. Forbes, and C. Halliwell, 2008: Characteristics of highresolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3408-3424.
38. Markowski, P. M., and Y. P. Richardson, 2010: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Wiley-Blackwell, 407 pp.
39. Marsh, P. T., J. S. Kain, V. Lakshmanan, A. J. Clark, N. M. Hitchens, and J. Hardy, 2012: A method for calibrating deterministic forecasts of rare events. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 531-538.
40. McGuire, E. L., 1962: The vertical structure of three drylines as revealed by aircraft traverses. National Severe Storms Laboratory Rep. 7, 10 pp.
41. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys., 20, 851-875.
42. Mesinger, F., and Coauthors, 2006: North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 343-360.
43. Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102 (D14), 16 663-16 682.
44. Peterson, R. E., 1983: The west Texas dryline: Occurrence and behavior. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Tulsa, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J9-J11.
45. Pielke, R. A., G. A. Dalu, J. S. Snook, T. J. Lee, and T. G. F. Kittel, 1991: Nonlinear influence of mesoscale land use on weather and climate. J. Climate, 4, 1053-1069.
46. Pietrycha, A. E., and E. N. Rasmussen, 2001: Observations of the Great Plains dryline utilizing mobile mesonet data. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P5.23. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/22296.pdf.]
47. R Development Core Team, cited 2012: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. RFoundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Available online at http://www.R-project.org.]
48. Rhea, J. O., 1966: A study of thunderstorm formation along dry lines. J. Appl. Meteor., 5, 59-63.
49. Richter, H., and L. F. Bosart, 2002: The suppression of deep moist convection near the southern Great Plains dryline. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1665-1691.
50. Roberts, N. M., and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 78-97.
51. Rogers, E., and Coauthors, 2009: The NCEP North American Mesoscale modeling system: Recent changes and future plans. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/ 19th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2A.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154114.pdf.]
52. Schaefer, J. T., 1974a: The life cycle of the dryline. J. Appl. Meteor., 13, 444-449.
53. Schaefer, J. T., 1974b: A simulative model of dryline motion. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 956-964.
54. Schaefer, J. T., 1986: The dryline. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, P. S. Ray, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 549-572.
55. Schultz, D. M., C. C. Weiss, and P. M. Hoffman, 2007: The synoptic regulation of dryline intensity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 1699- 1709.
56. Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2009: Next-day convection-allowing WRFmodel guidance:Asecond look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3351-3372.
57. Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2010: Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 263-280.
58. Schwarzkopf, M. D., and S. B. Fels, 1991: The simplified exchange method revisited-An accurate, rapid method for computation of infrared cooling rates and fluxes. J. Geophys. Res., 96 (D5), 9075-9096.
59. Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008. A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-4751STR, 113 pp. [Available online at http:// www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf.]
60. Sobash, R. A., J. S. Kain, D. R. Bright, A. R. Dean, M. C. Coniglio, and S. J. Weiss, 2011: Probabilistic forecast guidance for severe thunderstorms based on the identification of extreme phenomena in convection-allowing model forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 714-728.
61. Sun, J., S. B. Trier, Q. Xiao, M. L. Weisman, H. Wang, Z. Ying, M. Xu, and Y. Zhang, 2012: Sensitivity of 0-12-h warm-season precipitation forecasts over the central United States to model initialization. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 832-855.
62. Wakimoto, R. M., H. V. Murphey, E. V. Browell, and S. Ismail, 2006:The " triple point " on 24 May 2002 during IHOP. Part I: Airborne Doppler and LASE analyses of the frontal boundaries and convection initiation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 231-249.
63. Weisman, M. L., C. Davis, W. Wang, K. W. Manning, and J. B. Klemp, 2008: Experiences with 0-36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 407-437.
64. Weiss, C. C., and H. B. Bluestein, 2002: Airborne pseudo-dual Doppler analysis of a dryline-outflow boundary intersection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1207-1226.
65. Wolff, J. K., B. S. Ferrier, and C. F. Mass, 2012: Establishing closer collaboration to improve model physics for short-range forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, ES51-ES53.
66. Wu, W. S., R. J. Purser, and D. F. Parrish, 2002: Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2905-2916.
67. Wyngaard, J. C., 2004: Toward numerical modeling in the ''terra incognita.'' J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816-1826.
68. Xue, M., and W. J. Martin, 2006: A high-resolution modeling study of the 24 May 2002 dryline case during IHOP. Part II: Horizontal convective rolls and convective initiation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 172-191.
69. Ziegler, C. L., and E. N. Rasmussen, 1998: The initiation of moist convection at the dryline: Forecasting issues from a case study perspective. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1106-1131.
70. Ziegler, C. L., T. J. Lee, and R. A. Pielke, 1997: Convective initiation at the dryline: A modeling study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1001-1026.