Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: A case study of parasites, pollinators and plants

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 649-656

  Giannini, Tereza Cristina ^a   Chapman, Daniel S ^b   Saraiva, Antonio Mauro ^a   Alves dos Santos, Isabel ^a   Biesmeijer, Jacobus C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BEE; BROOD PARASITISM; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENTOMOLOGY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

APOIDEA; BOMBUS (GENUS); CENTRIS; KRAMERIA;

EID: 84878156397     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson R. P. et al. 2002. Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 98: 3-16.
2. Anderson R. P. et al. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model. 162: 211-232.
3. Araújo M. and Luoto M. 2007. The importance of biotic inter actions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 743-753.
4. Araújo M. B. and New M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 42-47.
5. Araújo M. B. et al. 2005. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 529-538.
6. Araújo M. B. et al. 2011. Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change. Ecography 34: 897-908.
7. Bascompte J. and Jordano P. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 567-593.
8. Baselga A. and Araújo M. B. 2009. Individualistic vs community modelling of species distributions under climate change. Ecography 32: 55-65.
9. Baselga A. and Araújo M. B. 2010. Do community-level models describe community variation effectively? J. Biogeogr. 37: 1842-1850.
10. Bateman B. L. et al. 2012. Nice weather for bettongs: using weather events, not climate means, in species distribution models. Ecography 35: 306-314.
11. Benton T. 2006. Bumblebees: the natural history and identifi cation of the species found in Britain. - Collins.
12. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45: 5-32.
13. Breiman L. et al. 1984. Classification and regression trees. - Chapman and Hall.
14. Brooker R. W. et al. 2007. Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. J. Theor. Biol. 245: 59-65.
15. Chapman D. S. 2010. Weak climatic associations among British plant distributions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 831-841.
16. Elith J. and Leathwick J. 2007. Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Divers. Distrib. 13: 265-275.
17. Fielding A. H. and Bell J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
18. Franklin J. 2009. Mapping species distribution. Spatial inference and prediction. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
19. Friedman J. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 19: 1-141.
20. Garcia R. A. et al. 2012. Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates. Global Change Biol. 18: 1253-1269.
21. Giannini T. C. et al. 2011. Ecological niche similarities of Peponapis bees and non-domesticated Cucurbita species. Ecol. Model. 222: 2011-2018.
22. Gilman S. E. et al. 2010. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 325-331.
23. Global Land Cover 2000. Global Land Cover database. - European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2003, < http://bioval.jrc.ec.europa.eu/glc2000/glc2000.php >.
24. Godsoe W. et al. 2009. Divergence in an obligate mutualism is not explained by divergent climatic factors. New Phytol. 183: 589-599.
25. Gordon C. et al. 2000. The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim. Dyn. 16: 147-168.
26. Gotelli N. J. et al. 2010. Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 5030-5035.
27. Guisan A. and Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8: 993-1009.
28. Hastie T. et al. 1994. Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89: 1255-1270.
29. Hegland S. J. et al. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol. Lett. 12: 184-195.
30. Heikkinen R. K. et al. 2007. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 754-763.
31. Hijmans J. R. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
32. Hof A. R. et al. 2012. How biotic interactions may alter future predictions of species distributions: future threats to the persistence of the arctic fox in Fennoscandia. Divers. Distrib. 18: 554-562.
33. Hortal J. et al. 2008. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. Oikos 117: 847-858.
34. Johnson C. J. and Gillingham M. P. 2008. Sensitivity of species-distribution models to error, bias, and model design: an application of resource selection functions for woodland caribou. Ecol. Model. 213: 143-155.
35. Lobo J. M. and Tognelli M. F. 2011. Exploring the effects of quantity and location of pseudo-absences and sampling biases on the performance of distribution models with limited point occurrence data. J. Nat. Conserv. 19: 1-7.
36. Loken A. 1984. Scandinavian species of the genus Psithyrus Lepeletier (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Scand. 23: 1-45.
37. McCullagh P. and Nelder J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. - Chapman and Hall.
38. Meier E. S. et al. 2010. Co-occurrence patterns of trees along macro-climatic gradients and their potential influence on the present and future distribution of Fagus sylvatica L. J. Biogeogr. 38: 371-382.
39. Memmott J. et al. 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol. Lett. 10: 710-717.
40. Michener C. D. 2000. The bees of the World. - Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
41. Pearson R. G. et al. 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species' range prediction. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1704-1711.
42. Pellissier L. et al. 2010. Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants. Ecography 33: 1004-1014.
43. Peterson A. T. et al. 2011. Ecological niches and geographical distributions. - Princeton Univ. Press.
44. Phillips S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190: 231-259.
45. Powney G. D. et al. 2010. Synchrony of butterfly populations across species' geographic ranges. Oikos 119: 1690-1696.
46. Ramirez J. and Jarvis A. 2008. High resolution statistically downscaled future climate surfaces. - International Centre for tropical Agriculture, CIAT, < http://gisweb.ciat.cgiar.org/GCMPage >.
47. Ridgeway G. 1999. The state of boosting. Comput. Sci. Stat. 31: 172-181.
48. Ripley B. D. 1996. Pattern recognition and neural networks. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
49. Simpson B. B. 1989. Krameriaceae. Flora Neotrop. Monogr. 49: 1-109.
50. Soberón J. and Peterson A. T. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodivers. Inform. 2: 1-10.
51. Soberón J. M. 2010. Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective. Ecography 33: 159-167.
52. Spaethe J. and Weidenmüller A. 2002. Size variation and for aging rate in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insect Soc. 49: 142-146.
53. Stockwell D. and Peters D. 1999. The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 13: 143-158.
54. Thuiller W. et al. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 8245-8250.
55. Thuiller W. et al. 2009a. ModOperating manual for BIOMOD. - Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine and Univ. Joseph Fourier.
56. Thuiller W. et al. 2009b. BIOMOD: a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32: 369-373.
57. Tylianakis J. M. et al. 2008. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11: 1351-1363.
58. Van der Putten W. H. et al. 2010. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2025-2034.
59. Van der Wal J. et al. 2009. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol. Model. 220: 589-594.
60. Vazquez D. P. et al. 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116: 1120-1127.
61. Vogel S. 1974. Ölblumen und ölsammelnde Bienen. Tropische Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7: 285-547.
62. Warren M. et al. 2010. A comparative approach to understanding factors limiting abundance patterns and distributions in a fig tree-fig wasp mutualism. Ecography 33: 148-158.