Synchrony of butterfly populations across species' geographic ranges

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1690-1696

  Powney, Gary D ^a,b   Roy, David B ^a,b   Chapman, Daniel ^a   Oliver, Tom H ^a,b  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CLIMATE CHANGE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; METAPOPULATION; SYNCHRONY;

APHANTOPUS HYPERANTUS; MANIOLA JURTINA; PYRONIA TITHONUS;

EID: 77956639420     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18168.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Asher J. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland 2001, Oxford Univ. Press
2. Bjørnstad O N. Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:427-432.
3. Burnham K P, Anderson D A. Model selection and multi-model inference (2nd ed.) 2003, Springer
4. Cattadori I M. Parasites and climate synchronize red grouse populations. Nature 2005, 433:737-741.
5. Crozier L. Warmer winters drive butterfly range expansion by increasing survivorship. Ecology 2004, 85:231-241.
6. Davies Z G. Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming. J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75:247-256.
7. Dennis R L H. Butterflies and climate change 1993, Manchester Univ. Press
8. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:487-515.
9. Fox R. The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland 2006, Pisces Publications
10. Gilpin M, Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations 1991, Linn. Soc. Lond
11. Hagen S B. Anisotropic patterned population synchrony in climatic gradients indicates nonlinear climatic forcing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:1509-1515.
12. Hanski I, Woiwod I P. Spatial synchrony in the dynamics of moth and aphid populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 1993, 62:656-668.
13. Haydon D, Steen H. The effects of large- and small-scale random events on the synchrony of metapopulation dynamics: a theoretical analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264:1375-1381.
14. Hill J K. Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range margin. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1999, 266:1197-1206.
15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007. The physical science basis 2007, IPCC, IPCC
16. Kerlin D H. Spatial synchrony in red grouse population dynamics. Oikos 2007, 116:2007-2016.
17. Lande R. Spatial scale of population synchrony: environmental correlation versus dispersal and density regulation. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:271-281.
18. Liebhold A. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35:467-490.
19. Liebhold A M. Geographic variation in density-dependent dynamics impacts the synchronizing effect of dispersal and regional stochasticity. Popul. Ecol. 2006, 48:131-138.
20. Manly B F J. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology 1998, Chapman and Hall
21. Mitchell T D, Jones P D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25:693-712.
22. Moran P A P. The statistical analysis of the Canadian lynx cycle. II. Synchronization and meteorology. Aust. J. Zool. 1953, 1:291-298.
23. Myers N. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
24. New M. Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 1: development of a 1961-90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J. Climate 1999, 12:829-856.
25. Oliver T H. Changes in habitat specificity of species at their climatic range boundaries. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1091-1102.
26. Oliver T H. Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability 2010, Ecol. Lett in press
27. Paradis E. Dispersal and spatial scale affect synchrony in spatial population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 1999, 2:114-120.
28. Parmesan C. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 1999, 399:579-583.
29. Pollard E. Population ecology and change in range of the white admiral butterfly Ladoga camilla L. in England. Ecol. Entomol. 1979, 4:61-74.
30. Pollard E, Yates T J. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation 1993, Chapman and Hall
31. Ranta E. Spatially autocorrelated disturbances and patterns in population synchrony. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1999, 266:1851-1856.
32. Rothery P, Roy D B. Application of generalized additive models to butterfly transect count data. J. Appl. Stat. 2001, 28:897-909.
33. Roy D B, Sparks T H. Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Global Change Biol. 2000, 6:407-416.
34. Roy D B. Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001, 70:201-217.
35. Smart S M. Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:2659-2665.
36. Sutcliffe O L. Spatial synchrony and asynchrony in butterfly population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 1996, 65:85-95.
37. Sutcliffe O L. Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation. Oecologia 1997, 109:235-241.
38. Thomas C D. Butterfly distributional patterns, processes and conservation. Conservation in a changing world 1998, 107-138. Mace G M. In: (eds), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp.
39. Thomas C D. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 2001, 411:577-581.
40. Thomas C D. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427:145-148.
41. Thomas J A. Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early-successional habitats. Ecography 1993, 16:278-284.
42. Thomas J A. Increased fluctuations of butterfly populations towards the northern edges of species' ranges. Ecography 1994, 17:215-220.