Issues involving the use of significant sameness in testing replications and generating knowledge

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1389-1392

  Dwayne Ball, A ^a   Sawyer, Alan G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence interval; Replication; Scientific knowledge; Significance testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878150013     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.003     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Alba J. President's column: Loose ends. Association of Consumer Research Newsletter (December), 2 1999.
2. Albers Sönke, Mantrala Murali K., Sridhar Shrihari Personal selling elasticities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 2010, 47(5):840-853.
3. Aronson E., Ellsworth P., Carlsmith J., Gonzalez M. Methods of research in social psychology 1990, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Second Edition.
4. Bass F., Wind J. Introduction to the special issue: Empirical generalizations in marketing. Marketing Science 1995, 14(3, 2):G1-G5.
5. Brinberg David, Lynch John G., Sawyer Alan G. Hypothesized and confounded explanations in theory tests: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19(2):139-154.
6. Farley J., Lehmann D., Sawyer A. Quantitative empirical generalization in marketing using meta-analysis. Marketing Science 1995, 14(3, 2):G36-G46.
7. Farris P., Reibstein D., Wilbur K. Distribution and market share. Relevant Knowledge Series 2009, 9-600. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA. D.M. Hanssens (Ed.).
8. Gallistel C. The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review 2009, 116:439-453. (April).
9. Gendall P., Hock J., Brennan J. The tea bag experiment: More evidence on incentives in mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society 1998, 40:347-351. (October).
10. Gorn G. The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing 1982, 46:94-101. (Winter).
11. Hanssens D. Empirical generalizations about marketing impact: What we have learned from academic research. Relevant Knowledge Series 2009, 9-600. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
12. Hubbard R., Lindsay R. How the emphasis on "original" empirical marketing research impedes knowledge development. Marketing Theory 2002, 2:381-402.
13. Kellaris J., Cox A. The effects of background music in advertising: A reassessment. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16(1):113-118. (June).
14. Lindsay M., Ehrenberg A. The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician 1993, 47:217-338.
15. Meehl P. Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science 1967, 34:103-115. (June).
16. Rodgers J. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet revolution. American Psychologist 2010.
17. Sawyer A., Ball A. Statistical power and effect size in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18:275-290.
18. Sawyer A., Peter J. The significance of statistical significance tests in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 1983, 20:122-133.
19. Tellis G. Generalizations about advertising effectiveness in markets. Journal of Advertising Research 2009, 49:240-245. (June).
20. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin 1971, 76:105-110. (August).
21. Wind Y., Sharpe B. Advertising empirical generalizations: Implications for research and action. Journal of Advertising Research 2009, 46:246-252. (June).