Hydrogen Production by Sorption-Enhanced Steam Glycerol Reforming: Sorption Kinetics and Reactor Simulation

AIChE Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 2105-2118

  Iliuta, Ion ^a   Radfarnia, Hamid R ^a   Iliuta, Maria C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

CO2 capture kinetics; in situ CO2 removal; Modeling; Sorption enhanced steam glycerol reforming

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION KINETICS; CAPTURE KINETICS; CATALYTIC STEAM REFORMING; OPERATING PARAMETERS; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; REACTOR TEMPERATURES; SITU CO; UNSTEADY STATE MODEL;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CATALYTIC REFORMING; CHEMICAL REACTORS; GLYCEROL; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; KINETICS; MODELS; SORPTION; STEAM;

STEAM REFORMING;

EID: 84878129597     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.13979     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cortright RD, Davda RP, Dumesic JA. Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature. 2002;418:964-967.
2. Hu X, Lu G. Investigation of the steam reforming of a series of model compounds derived from bio-oil for hydrogen production. Appl Catal B. 2009;88:376-385.
3. Saxena RC, Adhikari DK, Goyal HB. Biomass-based energy fuel through biochemical routes: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2009;13:167-178.
4. Fermoso J, He L, Chen D. Sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR): a direct route towards efficient hydrogen production from biomass-derived compounds. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2012;87:1367-1374. DOI 10.1002/jctb.3857.
5. 3 multifunctional catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like compounds. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:8942-8949. DOI: 10.1039/c2ee21995f.
6. Hirai T, Ikenanga N-O, Miyake T, Suzuki T. Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of glycerin on Ruthenium catalyst. Energy Fuels. 2005;19:1761-1762.
7. Dou B, Dupont V, Rickett G, Blakeman N, Williams PT, Chen H, Ding Y, Ghadiri M. Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:3540-3547.
8. Douette AMD, Turn SQ, Wang W, Keffer VI. Experimental investigation of hydrogen production from glycerin reforming. Energy Fuels. 2007;21:3499-3504.
9. Mackaluso JD. The use of syngas derived from biomass and waste products to produce ethanol and hydrogen, MMG 445 Basic Biotechnol eJ. 2007;3:98-103.
10. Dauenhauer PJ, Salge JR, Schmidt LD. Renewable hydrogen by autothermal steam reforming of volatile carbohydrates. J Catal. 2006;244:238-247.
11. Dou B, Dupont V, Williams PT, Chen H, Ding Y. Thermogravimetric kinetics of crude glycerol. Bioresour Technol. 2008;100:2613-2620.
12. Valliyappan T, Bakhshi NN, Dalai AK. Pyrolysis of glycerol for the production of hydrogen or syn gas. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:4476-4483.
13. Hashaikeh R, Butler IS, Kozinski JA. Selective promotion of catalytic reactions during biomass gasification to hydrogen. Energy Fuel. 2006;20:2743-2746.
14. Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AE. Glycerol reforming for hydrogen production: a review. Chem Eng Technol. 2009;32:1463-1469.
15. Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Production of fuel-cell grade hydrogen by thermal swing sorption enhanced reaction concept. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:781-790.
16. Harrison DP. Sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47:6486-6501.
17. Mayorga JR, Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J. 1999;45:248-256.
18. Ding Y, Alpay E. Adsorption-enhanced steam methane reforming. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:3929-3940.
19. 2 sorbent. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2003;28:1065-1071.
20. Yi KB, Harrison DP. Low-pressure sorption-enhanced hydrogen production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:1665-1669.
21. 3 as sorbent: sorption kinetics and reactor simulation. Catal Today. 2005;106:41-46.
22. Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Novel thermal-swing sorption-enhanced reaction process concept for hydrogen production by low temperature steam-methane reforming. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:5003-5014.
23. Li, ZS, Cai NS. Modeling of multiple cycles for sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and sorbent regeneration in fixed bed reactor. Energy Fuels. 2007;21:2909-2918.
24. 2 production. Chem Eng Sci. 2004;59:931-942.
25. Essaki K, Muramatsu T, Kato M. Effect of equilibrium shift by using lithium silicate pellets in methane steam reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:4555-4559.
26. 2 capture. I. Model development and validation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:6966-6974.
27. Kapil A, Bhat SA, Sadhukhan J. Multiscale characterization framework for sorption enhanced reaction processes. AIChE J. 2008;54:1025-1036.
28. Barelli L, Bidini G, Gallorini F, Servili, S. Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review. Energy. 2008;33:554-570.
29. 2 adsorbent in sorption enhanced catalytic reforming of methane-Part I: Reaction kinetics and sorbent capacity. Fuel. 2012;99:154-164.
30. Chen HS, Zhang T, Dou B, Dupont V, Williams PT, Ghadiri M, Ding Y. Thermodynamic analyses of adsorption enhanced steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:7208-7222.
31. 2 adsorption. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:7768-7777.
32. 2 sorbent with improved cyclic stability. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47:7841-7848.
33. 2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:10390-10398.
34. 2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:10604-10613.
35. 2-acceptor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:8729-8737.
36. Lee DK. An apparent kinetic model for the carbonation of calcium oxide by carbon dioxide. Chem Eng J. 2004;10:71-82.
37. Johnsen K, Grace J, Elnashaie S, Kolbeinsen L, Eriksen D. Modeling of sorption-enhanced steam reforming in a dual fluidized bubbling bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:4133-4143.
38. 2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:8846-8851.
39. Baker EH. The calcium oxide-carbon dioxide system in the pressure range 1-300 atm. J Chem Soc. 1962;70:464-470.
40. 3. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:10804-10817.
41. Aris R. Introduction to the Analysis of Chemical Reactors. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965.
42. Ranz E. Friction and transfer coefficients for single particles and packed beds. Chem Eng Progr. 1952;48:247-253.
43. Froment GF, Bischoff KB. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1990.
44. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM, Poling BE. The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1987.
45. Treybal RE. Mass Transfer Operations, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1968.
46. Harriott P. Thermal conductivity of catalyst pellets and other porous particles. Part I: Review of models and published results. Chem Eng J. 1975;10:65-71.
47. Yagi S, Kunii D, Wakao N. Studies on axial effective thermal conductivities in packed beds. AIChE J. 1960;6:543-546.
48. Edwards MF, Richardson JF. Gas dispersion in packed beds. Chem Eng Sci. 1968;23:109-123.
49. Finlayson BA. The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
50. He L, Parra MS, Blekkan EA, Chen D. Towards efficient hydrogen production from glycerol by sorption enhanced steam reforming. Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3:1046-1056.