Multiscale characterization framework for sorption enhanced reaction processes

AIChE Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1025-1036

  Kapil, Ankur ^a   Bhat, Shrikant A ^a   Sadhukhan, Jhuma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hydrogen; Multifunctional catalyst; Multiscale design; Natural gas reforming; Porous diffusion; Sorption enhanced reaction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGEN; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SORPTION;

MULTIFUNCTIONAL CATALYST; MULTISCALE DESIGN; NATURAL GAS REFORMING; POROUS DIFFUSION; SORPTION ENHANCED REACTION;

CATALYST ACTIVITY;

CATALYST ACTIVITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGEN; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SORPTION;

EID: 42149149832     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11428     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agar DW, Ruppel W. Multifunktionale reaktoren fdr die heterogene Katalyse. Chem Eng Technol. 1988;60:731.
2. Krishna R. Reactive separations: more ways to skin a cat. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57:1491.
3. Armor JN. Membrane catalysis: Where is it now, what needs to be done? Catalysis Today. 1995;25(3-4): 199-207.
4. Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J. 1999;45(2):248-256.
5. Hufton J, Waldron W, Weigel S, Rao M, Nataraj S, Sircar S. Sorption Enhanced Reaction Process (SERP) for the Production of Hydrogen. Paper presented at: Proceedings US DOE Hydrogen Program Review; 2000.
6. Carvill BT, Hufton JR, Anand M, Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 1996;42(10):2765-2772.
7. Waldron WE, Hufton JR, Sircar S. Production of hydrogen by cyclic sorption enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 2001;47(6):1477-1479.
8. Harrison DP, Peng Z. Low-carbon monoxide hydrogen by sorption-enhanced reaction. Int J of Chem Reactor Eng. 2003; 1(A37): 1-9.
9. Lopez Ortiz A, Harrison DP. Hydrogen production using sorption-enhanced reaction. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40(23):5102-5109.
10. Lyon RK, Cole JA. Unmixed combustion: an alternative to fire. Combustion and Flame. 2000;121(1-2):249-261.
11. Ding Y, Alpay E. Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55(18):3929-3940.
12. 2 adsorption on hydrotalcite adsorbent. Chem Eng Sci 2000;55:3461.
13. 2 capture: Conceptual parametric study. Fuel. 2005;84(14-15):1778-1789.
14. Xiu G-h, Soares JL, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Simulation of five-step one-bed sorption-enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 2002;48(12): 2817-2832.
15. Xiu G-h, Li P, Rodrigues AE. New generalized strategy for improving sorption-enhanced reaction process. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58(15): 3425-3437.
16. Xiu G, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Adsorption enhanced steam methane reforming with intrapartile diffusion limitations. Chem Eng J. 2003; 95:83-93.
17. Koumpouras GC, Alpay E, Lapkin A, Ding Y, Frantisek S. The effect of adsorbent characteristics on the performance of a continuous sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process. Chem Eng Sci. 2007; In Press.
18. Koumpouras GC, Alpay E, Stepanek F. Mathematical modelling of low-temperature hydrogen production with in situ CO2 capture. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62(10):2833-2841.
19. Koumpouras GC, Alpay E, Lapkin A, Ding Y, Stepanek F. The effect of adsorbent characteristics on the performance of a continuous sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process. Chem Eng Sci. In Press.
20. Elsner MP, Dittrich C, Agar DW. Adsorptive reactors for enhancing equilibrium gas-phase reactions - two case studies. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57(9):1607-1619.
21. Dietrich W, Lawrence PS, Grunewald M, Agar DW. Theoretical studies on multifunctional catalysts with integrated adsorption sites. Chem Eng J. 2005; 107(1-3): 103-111.
22. Rusten HK, Ochoa-Fernandez E, Chen D, Jakobsen HA. Numerical Investigation of Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Using Li2ZrO3 as CO2-acceptor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46(13): 4435-4443.
23. Danckwerts PV. Continuous flow systems : Distribution of residence times. Chem Eng Sci. 1953;2(1):1-13.
24. Sankararao B, Gupta SK. Modeling and simulation of fixed bed adsorbers (FBAs) for multi-component gaseous separations. Comp & Chem Eng. In Press.
25. Treybal RE. Mass-Transfer Operations. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1968.
26. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O'Connell JP. The properties of gases and liquids. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
27. Edwards MF, Richardson JF. Gas dispersion in packed beds. Chem Eng Sci. 1968;23(2):109-123.
28. Ergun S. Flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Progress. 1952;48(2):89.
29. Yagi S, Kunii D, N. W. Studies on axial effective thermal conductivities in packed beds. AIChE J. 1960;6(4):543-546.
30. Dixon AG, Ertan Taskin M, Hugh Stitt E, Nijemeisland M. 3D CFD simulations of steam reforming with resolved intraparticle reaction and gradients. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;In Press.
31. Xu J, Froment GF. Methane steam reforming, methanation and wate-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE J. 1989;35:88-97.
32. Ersoz A, Olgun H, Ozdogan S. Reforming options for hydrogen production from fossil fuels for PEM fuel cells. J of Power Sources. 2006;154(1):67-73.
33. Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Novel thermal-swing sorption-enhanced reaction process concept for hydrogen production by low-temperature steam-methane reforming. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46(14):5003-5014.
34. Xiu G, Soares JL, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Simulation of five step one bed sorption enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 2002;48:2817.