Sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR): A direct route towards efficient hydrogen production from biomass-derived compounds

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 87, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1367-1374

  Fermoso, Javier ^a   He, Li ^a   Chen, De ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS CONVERSION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; BIOMASS PROCESSING; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ENHANCED STEAM REFORMING; HIGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HIGH PURITY; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PROCESS; HYDROGEN YIELDS; HYDROTREATING; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LIQUID WASTES; LOW COSTS; OIL REFINERIES; SYN-GAS; WATER-GAS SHIFTS;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOGAS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; GLYCEROL; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; SORPTION; STEAM REFORMING; SYNTHESIS GAS; WATER GAS SHIFT;

BIOMASS;

ALCOHOL; CARBON DIOXIDE; GLYCEROL; HYDROGEN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS CONVERSION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GASIFICATION; HUMAN; HYDROGEN EVOLUTION; PROCESSING; SORPTION ENHANCED STEAM REFORMING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84866735337     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3857     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alvarez LH and Cervantes FJ, (Bio)nanotechnologies to enhance environmental quality and energy production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86: 1354-1363 (2011).
2. 2-free hydrogen from biomass. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80: 281-284 (2005).
3. Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Catalytic Steam Reforming, in Catalysis: Science and Technology, ed by Anderson JR, and Boudart M. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1984).
4. Williams R, Hydrogen Production. US Patent 1938202 (1933).
5. Gorin E and Retallick WB, Method for the Production of Hydrogen. US Patent 3108857 (1963).
6. Harrison DP, High purity hydrogen production using calcium enhancement, in Sorption Enhancement Reaction Concepts for Hydrogen Production: Materials and Processes, ed by Siscar S and Lee KB. Research Signpost, Kerala, India (2010).
7. He L and Chen D, Single-stage production of highly concentrated hydrogen from biomass-derived syngas. Chem Sus Chem 3: 1169-1171 (2010).
8. 2 sorbent. Biomass Bioenergy 28: 63-68 (2005).
9. Fermoso J, Rubiera F and Chen D, Sorption enhanced catalytic steam gasification process: a direct route from lignocellulosic biomass to high purity hydrogen. Energy Environ Sci 5: 6358-6367 (2012).
10. 2 sorbent. Int J Hydrogen Energy 28: 1065-1071 (2003).
11. Florin N and Harris A, Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass with in situ carbon dioxide capture using calcium oxide sorbents. Chem Eng Sci 63: 287-316 (2008).
12. 2-acceptor. Ind Eng Chem Res 46: 8729-8737 (2007).
13. Koumpouras GC, Alpay E, Lapkin A, Ding Y and Štěpánek F, The effect of adsorbent characteristics on the performance of a continuous sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process. Chem Eng Sci 62: 5632-5637 (2007).
14. 2 production by sorption enhanced steam reforming, in Sorption Enhancement Reaction Concepts for Hydrogen Production: Materials and Processes, ed by Siscar S and Lee KB. Research Signpost, Kerala, India (2010).
15. 2 sorbent for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Ind Eng Chem Res 45: 2522-2530 (2005).
16. Sato S, Lin S-Y, Suzuki Y and Hatano H, Hydrogen production from heavy oil in the presence of calcium hydroxide. Fuel 82: 561-567 (2003).
17. 2 Program. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC (2009).
18. He L, Salamanca Parra JM, Blekkan EA and Chen D, Towards efficient hydrogen production from glycerol by sorption enhanced steam reforming. Energy Environ Sci 3: 1046-1056 (2010).
19. He L, Berntsen H, Ochoa-Fernández E, Walmsley J, Blekkan E and Chen D, Co-Ni catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like materials for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming. Top Catal 52: 206-217 (2009).
20. 2 production: sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol. J Phys Chem A 114: 3834-3844 (2009).
21. Chen H, Zhang T, Dou B, Dupont V, Williams P, Ghadiri M, et al, Thermodynamic analyses of adsorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 7208-7222 (2009).
22. Czernik S, Evans R and French R, Hydrogen from biomass-production by steam reforming of biomass pyrolysis oil. Catal Today 129: 265-268 (2007).
23. He L and Chen D, Hydrogen production from glucose and sorbitol by sorption-enhanced steam reforming: challenges and promises. Chem Sus Chem 5: 587-595 (2012).
24. Chen D and He L, Towards an efficient hydrogen production from biomass: a review of processes and materials. Chem Catal Chem 3: 490-511 (2011).
25. Johnsen K, Grace JR, Elnashaie SSEH, Kolbeinsen L and Eriksen D, Modeling of sorption-enhanced steam reforming in a dual fluidized bubbling bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 45: 4133-4144 (2006).
26. 2 acceptors. Green Chem 9: 654-662 (2007).
27. Albrecht KO, Satrio JA, Shanks BH and Wheelock TD, Application of a combined catalyst and sorbent for steam reforming of methane. Ind Eng Chem Res 49: 4091-4098 (2010).
28. Wang N, Perret N and Foster A, Sustainable hydrogen production for fuel cells by steam reforming of ethylene glycol: a consideration of reaction thermodynamics. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36: 5932-5940 (2011).
29. Iordanidis AA, Kechagiopoulos PN, Voutetakis SS, Lemonidou AA and Vasalos IA, Autothermal sorption-enhanced steam reforming of bio-oil/biogas mixture and energy generation by fuel cells: concept analysis and process simulation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31: 1058-1065 (2006).
30. Florin NH and Harris AT, Hydrogen production from biomass coupled with carbon dioxide capture: the implications of thermodynamic equilibrium. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32: 4119-4134 (2007).
31. Davda RR, Shabaker JW, Huber GW, Cortright RD and Dumesic JA, Aqueous-phase reforming of ethylene glycol on silica-supported metal catalysts. Appl Catal B-Environ 43: 13-26 (2003).
32. 2 capture properties of nanocrystalline lithium zirconate. Chem Mater 18: 6037-6046 (2006).
33. 3. Chem Mater 19: 3294-3301 (2007).
34. 2 capture: thermodynamic analysis and experimental results. Int J Greenhouse Gas Con 1: 170-179 (2007).
35. Johnsen K and Grace JR, High-temperature attrition of sorbents and a catalyst for sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed environment. Powder Technol 173: 200-202 (2007).
36. 2(g) and calcined dolomite. Chem Eng Commun 146: 149-162 (1996).
37. 2 capture by limestone-derived sorbent during prolonged calcination/carbonation cycling. AICHE J 154: 1668-1677 (2008).
38. Alvarez D and Abanades JC, Pore-size and shape effects on the recarbonation performance of calcium oxide submitted to repeated calcination/recarbonation cycles. Energy Fuel 19: 270-278 (2005).
39. 2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Ind Eng Chem Res 45: 8846-8851 (2006).
40. 2 absorption capacity of CaO-based sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 44: 627-629 (2005).
41. Johnsen K, Ryu HJ, Grace JR and Lim CJ, Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as -acceptor. Chem Eng Sci 61: 1195-1202 (2006).
42. 2 capture process. Ind Eng Chem Res 46: 35-42 (2007).
43. 2 in a fluidized bed combustor. Ind Eng Chem Res 43: 5529-5539 (2004).
44. Gupta H and Fan L-S, Carbonation-calcination cycle using high reactivity calcium oxide for carbon dioxide separation from flue gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 41: 4035-4042 (2002).
45. 2 uptake efficiency. Chem Eng Sci 64: 1936-1943 (2009).
46. 2 removal on CaCeZrOx nanocrystals. Catal Today 171: 43-51 (2011).
47. 2 sorption capacity and stability on multicycle operation. Ind Eng Chem Res 47: 9537-9543 (2008).
48. 33. Energy Fuel 24: 2589-2595 (2010).
49. Peppley BA, Biomass for fuel cells: a technical and economic assessment. Int J Green Energy 3: 201-218 (2006).
50. 2 capture with CaO. Environ Sci Technol 39: 2861-2866 (2005).
51. Corella J, Toledo JM and Molina G, A review on dual fluidized-bed biomass gasifiers. Ind Eng Chem Res 46: 6831-6839 (2007).
52. Pfeifer C, Rauch R and Hofbauer H, In-bed catalytic tar reduction in a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. Ind Eng Chem Res 43: 1634-1640 (2004).
53. Singhabhandhu A and Tezuka T, A perspective on incorporation of glycerin purification process in biodiesel plants using waste cooking oil as feedstock. Energy 35: 2493-2504 (2010).
54. 2 sorption. Bioresource Technol 101: 2436-2442 (2010).
55. Ahmed S and Papadias DD, Hydrogen from Glycerol: A Feasibility Study. DOE Hydrogen Program, FY 2010 Annual Progress Report (2010).
56. Chemical price reports: glycerol. http://www.icis.com/bioresources (2011).