Tomato breeding in the genomics era: Insights from a SNP array

BMC Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Víquez Zamora, Marcela ^a,b   Vosman, Ben ^a,b   van de Geest, Henri ^a,b   Bovy, Arnaud ^a,b   Visser, Richard G F ^a,b   Finkers, Richard ^a,b   van Heusden, Adriaan W ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE FOR BIOSYSTEMS GENOMICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Custom made infinium array; Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP); Tomato wild relatives

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 4; CHROMOSOME 5; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; GERMPLASM; HETEROZYGOSITY; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOLANUM; SOLANUM PIMPINELLIFOLIUM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO; VARIETAS; WILD PLANT;

BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENOMICS; GERM CELLS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME;

EID: 84878105487     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-354     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Miller JC, Tanksley SD. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 1990, 80:437-448.
2. Agarwal M, Shrivastava N, Padh H. Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep 2008, 27:617-631.
3. Tang J, Vosman B, Voorrips RE, van der Linden CG, Leunissen JAM. QualitySNP: a pipeline for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in EST data from diploid and polyploid species. BMC Bioinforma 2006, 7:438.
4. Labate JA, Baldo AM. Tomato SNP discovery by EST mining and resequencing. Mol Breed 2005, 16:343-349.
5. Anithakumari AM, Tang J, Van Eck HJ, Visser RGF, Leunissen JAM, Vosman B, van der Linden CG. A pipeline for high throughput detection and mapping of SNPs from EST databases. Mol Breed 2010, 26(1):65-75.
6. Shirasawa K, Isobe S, Hirakawa H, Asamizu E, Fukuoka H, Just D, Rothan C, Sasamoto S, Fujishiro T, Kishida Y, Kohara M, Tsuruoka H, Wada T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Tabata S. SNP discovery and linkage map construction in cultivated tomato. DNA Res 2010, 17(6):381-391.
7. Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ, Ren H, Ng P, Zhou L, Tsan C, Chang W, Bullis D, Musmacker J, King C, Lebruska LL, Barker D, Oliphant A, Kuhn KM, Shen R. Whole-genome genotyping. Methods Enzymol 2006, 410:359-376.
8. Steemers FJ, Gunderson KL. Whole genome genotyping technologies on theBeadArray™ platform. Biotechnol J 2007, 2:41-49.
9. Appleby N, Edwards D, Batley J. New technologies for ultra-high throughput genotyping in plants. Methods Mol Biol 2009, 513:19-39.
10. Van Tienderen PH, De Haan AA, van der Linden CG, Vosman B. Biodiversity assessment using markers for ecologically important traits. Trends Ecol Evol 2002, 17(12):577-582.
11. Bredemeijer GMM, Arens P, Wouters D, Visser D, Vosman B. The use of semi-automated fluorescent microsatellite analysis for tomato cultivar identification. Theor Appl Genet 1998, 97:584-590.
12. Bredemeijer GMM, Cooke RJ, Ganal MW, Peeters R, Isaac P, Noordijk Y, Rendell S, Jackson J, Roder MS, Wendehake K, Dijcks M, Amelaine M, Wickaert V, Bertrand L, Vosman B. Construction and testing of a microsatellite database containing more than 500 tomato varieties. Theor Appl Genet 2002, 105:1019-1026.
13. Illumina® Infinium® HD Assay: Ultra Protocol Guide 2009, 1-224. California, USA: ©Illumina, Inc, Catalog #WG-901-4007, Illumina®.
14. Gunderson KL. Whole-genome genotyping on bead arrays. Methods Mol Biol 2009, 529:197-213.
15. Sim S-C, Durstewitz G, Plieske J, Wieseke R, Ganal MW, Van Deynze A, Hamilton JP, Buell CR, Causse M, Wijeratne S, Francis DM. Development of a Large SNP Genotyping Array and Generation of High-Density Genetic Maps in Tomato. PLoS One 2012, 7(7):1-11. e40563.
16. The Tomato Genome Consortium The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485:635-641. The Tomato Genome Consortium.
17. Labate JA, Robertson LD. Evidence of cryptic introgression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on wild tomato species alleles. BMC Plant Biol 2012, 12:133.
18. Rodriguez F, Wu F, Ané C, Tanksley S, Spooner DM. Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history?. BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9(1):191.
19. Gascuel O. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 1997, 14:685-695.
20. Darwin SC, Knapp S, Peralta IE. Taxonomy of tomatoes in the Galápagos Islands: native and introduced species of Solanum section Lycopersicon (Solanaceae). Syst Biodivers 2003, 1(1):29-53.
21. Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK, SNP workshop group SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19:208-216. SNP workshop group.
22. Street SL, Kyes RC, Grant R, Ferguson B. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are highly conserved in rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) macaques. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:480.
23. Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sections Lycopersicoides, Juglandifolia, Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Syst Bot Monogr 2008, 84:1-186.
24. Cooke RJ. Modern methods for cultivar verification and the transgenic plant challenge. Seed Sci Technol 1999, 27:669-680.
25. UPOV International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants of December 2, 1961 1961, Revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, on October 23, 1978, and on March 19, 1991: http://www.upov.int/en/publications/conventions/1991/act1991.htm, UPOV.
26. Vosman B, Visser D, Rouppe J, Van der Voort JR, Smulders MJM, Van Eeuwijk F. Detection of mutants and the establishment of essential derivation among rose varieties using AFLP. Theor Appl Genet 2004, 109:1718-1725.
27. Van Eeuwijk FA, Law JR. Statistical aspects of essential derivation, with illustrations based on lettuce and barley. Euphytica 2004, 137:129-137.
28. Arens P, Mansilla C, Deinum D, Cavellini L, Moretti A, Rolland S, van der Schoot H, Calvache D, Ponz F, Collonnier C, Mathis R, Smilde D, Caranta C, Vosman B. Development and evaluation of robust molecular markers linked to disease resistance in tomato for distinctness, uniformity and stability testing. Theor Appl Genet 2010, 120(3):655-664.
29. Sherman JD, Stack SM. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. V. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) karyotype and idiogram. Genome 1992, 35(2):354-359.
30. Stack SM, Royer SM, Shearer LA, Chang SB, Giovannoni JJ, Westfall DH, White RA, Anderson LK. Role of fluorescence in situ hybridization in sequencing the tomato genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009, 124:339-350.
31. Sim S-C, Van Deynze A, Stoffel K, Douches DS, Zarka D, Ganal MG, Chetelat RT, Hutton SF, Scott JW, Gardner RG, Panthee DR, Mutschler M, Myers JR, Francis DM. High-Density SNP Genotyping of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Reveals Patterns of Genetic Variation Due to Breeding. PLoS One 2012, 7(9):1-18. e45520.
32. Monforte AJ, Friedman E, Zamir D, Tanksley SD. Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theor Appl Genet 2010, 102(4):572-590.
33. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 1996, 92(2):213-224.
34. Bernacchi D, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Inai S, Lopez J, Petiard V, Sayama H, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley S. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of tomato. II. Evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 1998, 97:170-180.
35. Bretó MP, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA. Genetic variability in Lycopersicon species and their genetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 1993, 86:113-120.
36. Palmer JD, Zamir D. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982, 79:5006-5010.
37. Spooner DM, Anderson GJ, Jansen RK. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 1993, 80:676-688.
38. McClean PE, Hanson MR. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 1986, 112:649-667.
39. Marshall JA, Knapp S, Davey MR, Power JB, Cocking EC, Bennett MD, Cox AV. Molecular systematics of Solanum section Lycopersicum (Lycopersicon) using the nuclear ITS rDNA region. Theor Appl Genet 2001, 103:1216-1222.
40. Alvarez AE, van de Wiel CCM, Smulders MJM, Vosman B. Use of microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 2001, 103:1283-1292.
41. Grandillo S, Chetelat R, Knapp S, Spooner D, Peralta I, Cammareri M, Perez O, Termolino P, Tripodi P, Chiusano ML, Ercolano MR, Frusciante L, Monti L, Pignone D. Solanum sect. Lycopersicon. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Vegetables 2011, 129-215. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Kole C.
42. Ranc N, Muños S, Santoni S, Causse M. A clarified position for solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme in the evolutionary history of tomatoes (solanaceae). BMC Plant Biol 2008, 8:130.
43. Van Berloo R, Van Heusden S, Bovy A, Meijer-Dekens F, Lindhout P, Van Eeuwijk F. Genetic research in a public-private research consortium: prospects for indirect use of Elite breeding germplasm in academic research. Euphytica 2008, 161:293-300.
44. Steward CN, Via LE. A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques 1993, 14:748-750.
45. Kabelka E, Franchino B, Francis DM. Two loci from Lycopersicon hirsutum LA407 confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Phytopath 2002, 92:504-510.
46. Simms D, Cizdziel PE, Chomcynski P. TRIZOL: A new reagent for optimal single-step isolation of RNA. Focus 1993, 15:99-102.
47. Nijveen H, Van Kaauwen M, Esselink D, Hoegen B, Vosman B. QualitySNPng: a user-friendly SNP detection and visualisation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, .
48. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 2009, 10(3):R25.
49. Koboldt DC, Chen K, Wylie T, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Mardis ER, Weinstock GM, Wilson RK, Ding L. VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(17):2283-2285.
50. Service XS Project Report: Illumina iSelect Genotyping 2010, 1-28. 2333 BZ Leiden, Report produced by company Service XS (http://www.servicexs.com), Service XS.
51. Teo YY, Inouye M, Small KS, Gwilliam R, Deloukas P, Kwiatkowski DP, Clark TG. A genotype calling algorithm for the Illumina BeadArrayplatform. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2741-2746.
52. Hammer T, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 2001, 4(1):1-9.
53. Van Ooijen JW. Multipoint maximum likelihood mapping in a full-sib family of an outbreeding species. Genet Res 2011, 93:343-349.
54. Voorrips RE. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 2002, 93(1):77-78.