SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 208-216

  Morin, Phillip A ^a,d   Luikart, Gordon ^b   Wayne, Robert K ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION GENETICS;

EID: 1642271573     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Hedrick P.W. Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution. 53:1999;313-318.
2. Navajas M.J., et al. Microsatellite sequences are under-represented in two mite genomes. Insect Mol. Biol. 7:1998;249-256.
3. Vignal A., et al. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34:2002;275-305.
4. Brumfield R.T., et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as markers in phylogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:2003;249-256.
5. Carlson C.S., et al. Additional SNPs and linkage-disequilibrium analyses are necessary for whole-genome association studies in humans. Nat. Genet. 33:2003;518-521.
6. Wakeley J., et al. The discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms - and inferences about human demographic history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:2001;1332-1347.
7. van Tienderen P.H., et al. Biodiversity assessment using markers for ecologically important traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;577-582.
8. Syvanen A.C. Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:2001;930-942.
9. Ahren, D. et al. PHOREST: a web-based tool for comparative analyses of EST data manuscript. Mol. Ecol. Notes (in press).
10. Lyons L.A., et al. Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genomes. Nat. Genet. 15:1997;47-56.
11. Aitken, N. et al. Screening of CATS loci for SNP discovery in mammals. Mol. Ecol. (in press).
12. Sham P., et al. DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:2002;862-871.
13. Bensch S., et al. The use of AFLP to find an informative SNP: genetic differences across a migratory divide in willow warblers. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;2359-2366.
14. Brouillette J.A., et al. Estimate of nucleotide diversity in dogs with a pool-and-sequence method. Mamm. Genome. 11:2000;1079-1086.
15. Marth G., et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the public domain: how useful are they? Nat. Genet. 27:2001;371-372.
16. Neff M.M., et al. Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet. 18:2002;613-615.
17. Ren J. High-throughput single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 741:2000;115-128.
18. Taylor J.D., et al. Flow cytometric platform for high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Biotechniques. 30:2001;661-666. 668-669.
19. LaHood E.S., et al. Microsatellite allele ladders in two species of Pacific salmon: preparation and field-test results. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2:2002;187-190.
20. Fries R., Durstewitz G. Digital DNA signatures for animal tagging. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;508.
21. Sherry S.T., et al. Use of molecular variation in the NCBI dbSNP database. Hum. Mutat. 15:2000;68-75.
22. Morin P.A., et al. High throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping by the 5′ exonuclease assay. Biotechniques. 27:1999;538-552.
23. Leberg P.L. Effects of a population bottleneck on genetic variation as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution. 46:1992;477-494.
24. Mariette S., et al. Sampling within the genome for measuring within-population diversity: trade-offs between markers. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;1145-1156.
25. Pritchard J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155:2000;945-959.
26. Akey J.M., et al. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphism identification strategies on estimates of linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;232-242.
27. Kuhner M.K., et al. The usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphism data for estimating population parameters. Genetics. 156:2000;439-447.
28. Nielsen R. Estimation of population parameters and recombination rates from single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetics. 154:2000;931-942.
29. Chakraborty R., et al. The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: implications for development of new DNA typing systems. Electrophoresis. 20:1999;1682-1696.
30. Krawczak M. Informativity assessment for biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms. Electrophoresis. 20:1999;1676-1681.
31. Manel S., et al. Detecting wildlife poaching: identifying the origin of individuals using Bayesian assignment tests and multi-locus genotypes. Conserv. Biol. 16:2000;650-657.
32. Schlötterer C., Harr B. Single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from ancestral populations show no evidence for biased diversity estimates in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;947-950.
33. Miller C.R., et al. Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. Genetics. 160:2002;357-366.
34. Blouin M.S., et al. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol. Ecol. 5:1996;393-401.
35. Glaubitz J.C., et al. Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol. Ecol. 12:2003;1039-1047.
36. Kalinowski S.T. How many alleles per locus should be used to estimate genetic distances? Heredity. 88:2002;62-65.
37. Waples R.S. Genetic methods for estimating the effective size of Cetacean populations. Hoelzel R. Genetic Methods for Estimating the Effective Size of Cetacean Populations. 1991;279-300 International Whaling Commission.
38. Beaumont M.A., Nichols R.A. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 263:1996;1619-1626.
39. Allendorf F.W., Seeb L.W. Concordance of genetic divergence among sockeye salmon populations at allozyme, nuclear DNA, and mitochondrial DNA markers. Evolution. 54:2000;640-651.
40. Paetkau D., et al. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol. Ecol. 4:1995;347-354.
41. Palsbøll P.J. Genetic tagging: contemporary molecular ecology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68:1999;3-22.
42. Schwartz M.K., et al. Using DNA to estimate population size: many methods, much potential, unknown utility. Anim. Conserv. 2:1998;321-323.
43. Paetkau D., et al. Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Mol. Ecol. 7:1998;1283-1292.
44. Spencer C.C., et al. Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol. Ecol. 9:2000;1517-1528.
45. Beaumont M.A. Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics. 153:1999;2013-2029.
46. Fay J.C., Wu C.I. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;1003-1005.
47. Stephens M., et al. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:2001;978-989.
48. Avise, J.C. (2000) Phylogeography. The History and Formation of Species, Harvard University Press.
49. Sabeti P.C., et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature. 419:2002;832-837.
50. Harr B., et al. Hitchhiking mapping: a population-based fine-mapping strategy for adaptive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;12949-12954.
51. Luikart, G. et al. The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. (in press).
52. Schlötterer C. Towards a molecular characterization of adaptation in local populations. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:2002;683-687.
53. Lenormand T., et al. Evaluating gene flow using selected markers: a case study. Genetics. 149:1998;1383-1392.
54. Kohn M.H., et al. Natural selection mapping of the warfarin-resistance gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;7911-7915.
55. Ford M.J. Effects of natural selection on patterns of DNA sequence variation at the transferrin, somatolactin, and p53 genes within and among chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations. Mol. Ecol. 9:2000;843-855.
56. Barton N.H. Genetic hitchhiking. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 355:2000;1553-1562.
57. Beaumont, M.A. and Balding, D.J. (2000) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol. (in press).
58. Crandall K.A., et al. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;290-295.
59. Reed D.H., Frankham R. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution. 55:2001;1095-1103.
60. Crnokrak P., Merilä J. Genetic population divergence: markers and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;501-501.
61. Latta R.G., McKay J.K. Genetic population divergence: markers and traits - response. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;501-502.
62. Hamblin M.T., et al. Complex signatures of natural selection at the Duffy blood group locus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70:2002;369-383.
63. Valdes A.M., et al. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics. 133:1993;737-749.
64. Taberlet P., Luikart G. Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68:1999;41-55.
65. Waits L.P., et al. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;249-256.
66. Jamieson A., Taylor S.C. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 28:1997;397-400.
67. Primmer C.R., et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;603-612.
68. Makridakis N.M., Reichardt J.K. Multiplex automated primer extension analysis: simultaneous genotyping of several polymorphisms. Biotechniques. 31:2001;1374-1380.
69. Hirschhorn J.N., et al. SBE-TAGS: an array-based method for efficient single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;12164-12169.
70. Hsu T.M., Kwok P.Y. Homogeneous primer extension assay with fluorescence polarization detection. Methods Mol. Biol. 212:2003;177-187.