High-Density SNP Genotyping of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Reveals Patterns of Genetic Variation Due to Breeding

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Sim, Sung Chur ^a   van Deynze, Allen ^b   Stoffel, Kevin ^b   Douches, David S ^c   Zarka, Daniel ^c   Ganal, Martin W ^d   Chetelat, Roger T ^b   Hutton, Samuel F ^e   Scott, John W ^e   Gardner, Randolph G ^f   Panthee, Dilip R ^f   Mutschler, Martha ^g   Myers, James R ^h   Francis, David M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TRAITGENETICS GMBH   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^f NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^h OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHERRY; CHROMOSOME 11; CHROMOSOME 2; CHROMOSOME 4; CHROMOSOME 5; CHROMOSOME 6; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVATED SPECIES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; INBRED STRAIN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84866645938     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045520     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR, (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.
2. Miller JC, Tanksley SD, (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437-448.
3. United States Department of Agriculture, States Relations Service, Office of Experiment Stations (1919) Experiment Station Record Vol 39. UNT Digital Library. Available: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5015/. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
4. Alexander LJ (1934) Leaf mold resistance in the tomato. Ohio Agri Exp Sta Bull 539.
5. Watts VM, (1947) The use of Lycopersicon peruvianum as a source of nematode resistance in tomatoes. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 49: 233-234.
6. Park YH, West MAL, St Clair DA, (2004) Evaluation of AFLPs for germplasm fingerprinting and assessment of genetic diversity in cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Genome 47: 510-518.
7. Williams CE, St. Clair DA, (1993) Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36: 619-630.
8. Sim SC, Robbins MD, Chilcott C, Zhu T, Francis DM, (2009) Oligonucleotide array discovery of polymorphisms in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of SNP variation associated with breeding. BMC Genomics 10: 10.
9. Sim SC, Robbins MD, Van Deynze A, Michel AP, Francis DM, (2011) Population structure and genetic differentiation associated with breeding history and selection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Heredity 106: 927-935.
10. Hamilton JP, Sim S, Stoffel K, Van Deynze A, Buell CR, et al. (2012) Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in cultivated tomato via sequencing by synthesis. The Plant Genome 5: 17-29.
11. Gupta PK, Rustgi S, Mir RR, (2008) Array-based high-throughput DNA markers for crop improvement. Heredity 101: 5-18.
12. Yang W, Bai XD, Kabelka E, Eaton C, Kamoun S, et al. (2004) Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Mol Breeding 14: 21-34.
13. Labate JA, Baldo AM, (2005) Tomato SNP discovery by EST mining and resequencing. Mol Breeding 16: 343-349.
14. Jiménez-Gómez J, Maloof J, (2009) Sequence diversity in three tomato species: SNPs, markers, and molecular evolution. BMC Plant Biol 9: 85.
15. Van Deynze A, Stoffel K, Buell CR, Kozik A, Liu J, et al. (2007) Diversity in conserved genes in tomato. BMC Genomics 8: 465.
16. Labate JA, Robertson LD, Wu FN, Tanksley SD, Baldo AM, (2009) EST, COSII, and arbitrary gene markers give similar estimates of nucleotide diversity in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Theor Appl Genet 118: 1005-1014.
17. Steemers FJ, Chang WH, Lee G, Barker DL, Shen R, et al. (2006) Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat Methods 3: 31-33.
18. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Berard A, Buckler ES, et al. (2011) A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6: e28334.
19. Sim S, Durstewitz G, Plieske J, Wieseke R, Ganal M, et al. (2012) Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 7: e40563.
20. Zhao K, Tung CW, Eizenga GC, Wright MH, Ali ML, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nat Commun 2: 467.
21. Thomson MJ, Zhao K, Wright M, McNally KL, Rey J, et al. (2012) High-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping for breeding applications in rice using the BeadXpress platform. Mol Breeding 29: 875-886.
22. Graham TO, (1959) Impact of recorded mendelian factors on the tomato 1929-1959. Tom Gen Coop Rep 9: 37.
23. Rasmussen WD, (1968) Advances in American agriculture: The mechanical tomato harvester as a case study. Technol Cult 9: 531-543.
24. Sim SC, Merk HL, McQueen J (2011) Downstream analysis of SNPs from the SolCAP tomato infinium aray (II). Available: http://www.extension.org/pages/61007. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
25. Labate JA, Francis D, McGrath MT, Panthee D, Robertson LD, (2010) Diversity in a collection of heirloom tomato varieties. HortScience 45: S145-S145.
26. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK, (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4: 379-391.
27. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G, (2008) LOSITAN: A workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 323.
28. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA, (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc B 263: 1619-1626.
29. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Frary A, Grandillo S, van der Knaap E, et al. (2000) fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
30. Van der Hoeven R, Ronning C, Giovannoni J, Martin G, Tanksley S, (2002) Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14: 1441-1456.
31. Liu JP, Van Eck J, Cong B, Tanksley SD, (2002) A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 13302-13306.
32. Munos S, Ranc N, Botton E, Berard A, Rolland S, et al. (2011) Increase in tomato locule number is controlled by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms located near WUSCHEL. Plant Physiol 156: 2244-2254.
33. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, van der Knaap E, (2008) A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319: 1527-1530.
34. Cong B, Barrero LS, Tanksley SD, (2008) Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nat Genet 40: 800-804.
35. Solanaceae Coordinated Agricultural Project website. Available: http://solcap.msu.edu/tomato_phenotype_data.shtml. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
36. Sol Genomics Network website. Availalbe: http://solgenomics.net/search/phenotypes/stock. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
37. Merk HL, Yarnes SC, Van Deynze A, Tong N, Menda N, et al. (2012) Trait diversity and potential for selection indices based on variation among regionally adapted processing tomato germplasm. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. In press.
38. Luo J, Butelli E, Hill L, Parr A, Niggeweg R, et al. (2008) AtMYB12 regulates caffeoyl quinic acid and flavonol synthesis in tomato: expression in fruit results in very high levels of both types of polyphenol. Plant J 56: 316-326.
39. Ray J, Moureau P, Bird C, Bird A, Grierson D, et al. (1992) Cloning and characterization of a gene involved in phytoene synthesis from tomato. Plant Mol Biol 19: 401-404.
40. Yuan DJ, Chen J, Shen HL, Yang WC, (2008) Genetics of flesh color and nucleotide sequence analysis of phytoene synthase gene 1 in a yellow-fruited tomato accession PI114490. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 118: 20-24.
41. Ronen G, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Hirschberg J, (2000) An alternative pathway to beta-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of Beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 11102-11107.
42. Barry CS, McQuinn RP, Chung MY, Besuden A, Giovannoni JJ, (2008) Amino acid substitutions in homologs of the STAY-GREEN protein are responsible for the green-flesh and chlorophyll retainer mutations of tomato and pepper. Plant Physiol 147: 179-187.
43. Powell A, Nguyen C, Hill T, Cheng K, Figueroa-Balderas R, et al. (2012) Uniform ripening encodes a Golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development. Science 336: 1711-1715.
44. Martin GB, Brommonschenkel SH, Chunwongse J, Frary A, Ganal MW, et al. (1993) Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 262: 1432-1436.
45. Yang W, Sacks EJ, Ivey MLL, Miller SA, Francis DM, (2005) Resistance in Lycopersicon esculentum intraspeciflc crosses to race T1 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria causing bacterial spot of tomato. Phytopathology 95: 519-527.
46. Dixon MS, Jones DA, Keddie JS, Thomas CM, Harrison K, et al. (1996) The tomato Cf-2 disease resistance locus comprises two functional genes encoding leucine-rich repeat proteins. Cell 84: 451-459.
47. Milligan SB, Bodeau J, Yaghoobi J, Kaloshian I, Zabel P, et al. (1998) The root knot nematode resistance gene Mi from tomato is a member of the leucine zipper, nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat family of plant genes. Plant Cell 10: 1307-1319.
48. Scott JW, Agrama HA, Jones JP, (2004) RFLP-based analysis of recombination among resistance genes to Fusarium wilt races 1, 2, and 3 in tomato. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 129: 394-400.
49. Bohn GW, Tucker CM, (1939) Immunity to fusarium wilt in the tomato. Science 89: 603-604.
50. Pei CC, Wang H, Zhang JY, Wang YY, Francis DM, et al. (2012) Fine mapping and analysis of a candidate gene in tomato accession PI128216 conferring hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3. Theor Appl Genet 124: 533-542.
51. Simons G, Groenendijk J, Wijbrandi J, Reijans M, Groenen J, et al. (1998) Dissection of the Fusarium I2 gene cluster in tomato reveals six homologs and one active gene copy. Plant Cell 10: 1055-1068.
52. Hemming MN, Basuki S, McGrath DJ, Carroll BJ, Jones DA, (2004) Fine mapping of the tomato I-3 gene for fusarium wilt resistance and elimination of a co-segregating resistance gene analogue as a candidate for I-3. Theor Appl Genet 109: 409-418.
53. Lanfermeijer FC, Dijkhuis J, Sturre MJG, de Haan P, Hille J, (2003) Cloning and characterization of the durable tomato mosaic virus resistance gene Tm-2(2) from Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Mol Biol 52: 1037-1049.
54. Chunwongse J, Chunwongse C, Black L, Hanson P, (2002) Molecular mapping of the Ph-3 gene for late blight resistance in tomato. J Hortic Sci Biotech 77: 281-286.
55. Robbins MD, Masud MAT, Panthee DR, Gardner RG, Francis DM, et al. (2010) Marker-assisted selection for coupling phase resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus and Phytophthora infestans (late blight) in tomato. HortScience 45: 1424-1428.
56. Kawchuk LM, Hachey J, Lynch DR, Kulcsar F, van Rooijen G, et al. (2001) Tomato Ve disease resistance genes encode cell surface-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 6511-6515.
57. Spassova MI, Prins TW, Folkertsma RT, Klein-Lankhorst RM, Hille J, et al. (2001) The tomato gene Sw5 is a member of the coiled coil, nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat class of plant resistance genes and confers resistance to TSWV in tobacco. Mol Breeding 7: 151-161.
58. Moreau P, Thoquet P, Olivier J, Laterrot H, Grimsley N, (1998) Genetic mapping of Ph-2, a single locus controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe In 11: 259-269.
59. Kim MJ, Mutschler MA, (2005) Transfer to processing tomato and characterization of late blight resistance derived from Solanum pimpinellifolium L. L3708. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 130: 877-884.
60. Lippman ZB, Cohen O, Alvarez JP, Abu-Abied M, Pekker I, et al. (2008) The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. Plos Biol 6: e288.
61. Pnueli L, CarmelGoren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, et al. (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979-1989.
62. Jones CM, Rick CM, Adams D, Jernstedt J, Chetelat RT, (2007) Genealogy and fine mapping of obscuravenosa, a gene affecting the distribution of chloroplasts in leaf veins, and evidence of selection during breeding of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum; Solanaceae). Am J Bot 94: 935-947.
63. Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D, (2003) The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52: 1215-1222.
64. Mao L, Begum D, Chuang HW, Budiman MA, Szymkowiak EJ, et al. (2000) JOINTLESS is a MADS-box gene controlling tomato flower abscission zone development. Nature 406: 910-913.
65. Budiman MA, Chang SB, Lee S, Yang TJ, Zhang HB, et al. (2004) Localization of jointless-2 gene in the centromeric region of tomato chromosome 12 based on high resolution genetic and physical mapping. Theor Appl Genet 108: 190-196.
66. Cleveland WS, (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 829-836.
67. Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
68. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
69. Rick CM, (1958) The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Economic Bot 12: 346-367.
70. Rick CM (1976) Tomato, Lycopersicom esculentum (Solanaceae). In: Simmonds NW, editor. Evolution of crop plants. London, England: Longman Group. 268-273.
71. Ranc N, Munos S, Santoni S, Causse M, (2008) A clarified position for Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme in the evolutionary history of tomatoes (solanaceae). BMC Plant Biol 8: 130.
72. Rick CM, Fobes JF, Holle M, (1977) Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Plant Syst Evol 127: 139-170.
73. Flint-Garcia SA, Thornsberry JM, Buckler ES, (2003) Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 357-374.
74. Robbins MD, Sim SC, Yang W, Van Deynze A, van der Knaap E, et al. (2011) Mapping and linkage disequilibrium analysis with a genome-wide collection of SNPs that detect polymorphism in cultivated tomato. J Exp Bot 62: 1831-1845.
75. van Berloo R, Zhu AG, Ursem R, Verbakel H, Gort G, et al. (2008) Diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis within a selected set of cultivated tomatoes. Theor Appl Genet 117: 89-101.
76. George WL, Berry SA (1983) Genetics and breeding of processing tomatoes. In: Gould WA, editor. Tomato production, processing and quality evaluation. Westport: AVI Publishing Company, Inc. 48-65.
77. Stevens MA, Rick CM (1986) Genetics and Breeding. In: Athernon JG, Rudich J, editors. The Tomato Crop A Scientific Basis for Improvement. London, England: Chapman and Hall. 35-109.
78. Gardner RG, (1992) 'Mountain Spring' tomato; NC 8276 and NC 84173 tomato breeding lines. HortScience 27: 1233-1234.
79. Scott JW, Baldwin EA, Klee HJ, Brecht JK, Olson SM, et al. (2008) Fla. 8153 hybrid tomato; Fla. 8059 and Fla. 7907 breeding lines. HortScience 43: 2228-2230.
80. Berry SZ, Gould WA, Wiese KL, (1991) 'Ohio 8245′ processing tomato. HortScience 26: 1093.
81. Doganlar S, Frary A, Ku H, Tanksley S, (2002) Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45: 1189-1202.
82. Kabelka E, Franchino B, Francis DM, (2002) Two loci from Lycopersicon hirsutum LA407 confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Phytopathology 92: 504-510.
83. Graham EB, Frary A, Kang JJ, Jones CM, Gardner RG, (2004) A recombinant inbred line mapping population derived from a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pimpinellifolium cross. Tom Gen Coop Rep 54: 22-25.
84. Robbins MD, Darrigues A, Sim S, Masud MAT, Francis DM, (2009) Characterization of hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3 (Xanthomonas perforans) from tomato accession PI 128216. Phytopathology 99: 1037-1044.
85. Eshed Y, Zamir D, (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
86. Menda N, Semel Y, Peled D, Eshed Y, Zamir D, (2004) In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. Plant J 38: 861-872.
87. Sol Genomics Network website. Available: http://solgenomics.net/cview. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
88. Solanaceae Coordinated Agricultural Project website. Available: http://solcap.msu.edu/tomato_genotype_data.shtml. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
89. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
90. Stacklies W, Redestig H, Scholz M, Walther D, Selbig J, (2007) pcaMethods- a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics 23: 1164-1167.
91. Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, Brown P, Hastie T, et al. (2001) Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17: 520-525.
92. Weir BS, Cockerham CC, (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of populatoin structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
93. Dieringer D, Schlotterer C, (2003) MICROSATELLITE ANALYSER (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 167-169.
94. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ, (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92: 832-839.
95. Hurlbert SH, (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577-586.
96. Nei M, (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
97. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW, (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314-331.
98. Microsatellite Analyzer User Manual. Available: http://i122server.vu-wien.ac.at/MSA/info.html/MSA_info.html. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
99. Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, et al. (2011) Vegan: Community ecology package. Avaiable: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan//index.html. Accessed 2012 Aug 27. R package version 20-2.
100. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
101. International Tomato Genome Sequencing Project website. Available: http://solgenomics.net/organism/Solanum_lycopersicum/genome. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
102. The Tomato Genome Consortium, (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485: 635-641.
103. Sol Genomics Network website. Available: http://solgenomics.net/tools/blast/index.pl. Accessed 2012 Aug 27.
104. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, et al. (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633-2635.
105. van Berloo R, (2008) GGT 2.0: versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data. J Hered 99: 232-236.
106. Hill WG, Weir BS, (1988) Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol 33: 54-78.
107. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, (2009) Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 92: 433-443.
108. Breseghello F, Sorrells ME, (2006) Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172: 1165-1177.