Greater sexual reproduction contributes to differences in demography of invasive plants and their noninvasive relatives

Ecology

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 995-1004

  Burns, Jean H ^a,c   Pardini, Eleanor A ^a   Schutzenhofer, Michele R ^a,b   Chung, Y Anny ^a,d   Seidler, Katie J ^a   Knight, Tiffany M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Demography; Invasive species; Life table response experiment; Matrix population model; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DEMOGRAPHY; DISPERSAL; HERBARIUM; INVASIVE SPECIES; LIFE TABLE; NATIVE SPECIES; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; TAXONOMY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETICS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; DEMOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHYLOGENY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION;

MISSOURI; SAINT LOUIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878052821     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-1310.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Auld, T. D. 1995. Soil seedbank patterns of 4 trees and shrubs from arid Australia. Journal of Arid Environments 29:33-45.
2. Baskin, C. C., and J. M. Baskin. 2004. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Third edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
3. Buckley, Y. M., S. Ramula, S. P. Blomberg, J. H. Burns, E. E. Crone, J. Ehrlén, T. M. Knight, J.-B. Pichancourt, H. Quested, and G. M. Wardle. 2010. Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. Ecology Letters 13:1182-1197.
4. Burnham, K. P., and D. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Second edition. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
5. Burns, J. H. 2008. Demographic performance predicts invasiveness of species in the Commelinaceae under high-nutrient conditions. Ecological Applications 18:335-346.
6. Burns, J. H., S. P. Blomberg, E. E. Crone, J. Ehrlen, T. M. Knight, J. B. Pichancourt, S. Ramula, G. M. Wardle, and Y. M. Buckley. 2010. Empirical tests of life-history evolution theory using phylogenetic analysis of plant demography. Journal of Ecology 98:334-344.
7. Byers, D. L., and T. R. Meagher. 1997. A comparison of demographic characteristics in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium. Ecological Applications 7:519-530.
8. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
9. Crone, E. E., et al. 2011. How do plant ecologists use matrix population models? Ecology Letters 14:1-8.
10. Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:183-211.
11. Daehler, C. C., and D. A. Carino. 2000. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions 2:92-103.
12. Davidson, A. M., M. Jennions, and A. B. Nicotra. 2011. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 14:419-431.
13. East, E. M. 1940. The distribution of self-sterility in the flowering plants. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 82:449-518.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
15. Fiedler, P. L. 1987. Life history and population dynamics of rare and common mariposa lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology 75:977-995.
16. Fiske, I. J., E. M. Bruna, and B. M. Bolker. 2008. Effects of sample size on estimates of population growth rates calculated with matrix models. PLoS One 3:e3080.
17. Grotkopp, E., M. Rejmá nek, and T. L. Rost. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. American Naturalist 159:396-419.
18. Ingold, J. L., and M. J. Craycraft. 1983. Avian frugivory on honeysuckle (Lonicera) in southwestern Ohio in fall. Ohio Journal of Science 83:256-258.
19. Kalisz, S. 1991. Experimental determination of seed bank age structure in the winter annual Collinsia verna. Ecology 72: 575-585.
20. Lonsdale, W. M. 1993. Rates of spread of an invading species-Mimosa pigra in Northern Australia. Journal of Ecology 81: 513-521.
21. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 1991. Phylogentic analysis of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
22. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. American Naturalist 149:646-667.
23. McDonnell, M. J., and E. W. Stiles. 1983. The structural complexity of old field vegetation and the recruitment of bird-dispersed plant species. Oecologia 56:109-116.
24. McGraw, J. B., and H. Caswell. 1996. Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data. American Naturalist 147:47-64.
25. MEPP. 2002. Missouri Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/research/mepp/ratings.shtml
26. Meyer, S. E., D. Quinney, and J. Weaver. 2006. A stochastic population model for Lepidium papilaferum (Brassicaceae), a rare desert ephemeral with a persistent seed bank. American Journal of Botany 93:891-902.
27. Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2004. Buffering life histories against environmental stochasticity: accounting for spurious correlation between the variabilities of vital rates and their contributions to fitness. American Naturalist 163:579-590.
28. Neubert, M. G., and H. Caswell. 2000. Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81:1613-1628.
29. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
30. Pardini, E. A., J. M. Drake, J. M. Chase, and T. M. Knight. 2009. Complex population dynamics and control of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard). Ecological Applications 19:387-397.
31. Pardini, E. A., J. M. Drake, and T. M. Knight. 2011. On the utility of population models for invasive plant management: response to Evans and Davis. Ecological Applications 21: 614-618.
32. Parker, I. M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10:726-743.
33. Parsons, W. T., and E. G. Cuthbertson. 2001. Noxious weeds of Australia. Second edition. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.
34. Peters, J. 2004. Tetrazolium testing handbook for agricultural seeds. Contribution No. 29 to the Handbook of seed testing. Association of Official Seed Analysts, North Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
35. Pheloung, P. C., P. A. Williams, and S. R. Halloy. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57:239-251.
36. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
37. Ramula, S., T. M. Knight, J. H. Burns, and Y. M. Buckley. 2008. General guidelines for invasive plant management based on comparative demography of invasive and native plant populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1124-1133.
38. Rejmá nek, M. 2011. Invasiveness. Pages 379-385 in D. Simberloff and M. Rejmanek, editors. Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
39. Rejmá nek, M., and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655-1661.
40. Richardson, D. M., P. Pysek, M. Rejmá nek, M. G. Barbour, F. D. Panetta, and C. J. West. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93-107.
41. Schutzenhofer, M. R., and T. M. Knight. 2007. Populationlevel effects of augmented herbivory on Lespedeza cuneata: implications for biological control. Ecological Applications 17:965-971.
42. Schutzenhofer, M. R., T. J. Valone, and T. M. Knight. 2009. Herbivory and population dynamics of invasive and native Lespedeza. Oecologia 161:57-66.
43. USDA. 2010. USDA plants database. http://plants.usda.gov/java/Van
44. Kleunen, M., E. Weber, and M. Fischer. 2010. A metaanalysis of trait differences between invasive and noninvasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13:235-245.
45. Webb, C. O., and M. J. Donoghue. 2005. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5:181-183.
46. Wissemann, V., and F. H. Hellwig. 1997. Reproduction and hybridisation in the genus Rosa, section Caninae (Ser) Rehd. Botanica Acta 110:251-256.