A comparison of demographic characteristics in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium

Ecological Applications

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 519-530

  Byers, Diane L ^a,b   Meagher, Thomas R ^a,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Dept of Ecol   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Demography; Eupatorium; Life history; Pine Barrens; Projection matrix analysis; Rare and endangered species

Indexed keywords

EUPATORIUM; EUPATORIUM PERFOLIATUM; EUPATORIUM RESINOSUM; ASTERACEAE;

DEMOGRAPHY; GROWTH RATE; RARE PLANT;

EID: 0030613885     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0519:ACODCI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63:224-247.
2. Aspinwall, N., and T. Christian. 1992. Pollination biology, seed production, and population structure in queen-of-the-prairie, Filipendula rubra (Rosaceae) at Botkin Fen, Missouri. American Journal of Botany 79:488-494.
3. Bierzychudek, P. 1982. The demography of Jack-in-the-pulpit, a forest perennial that changes sex. Ecological Monographs 52:335-351.
4. Bishop, Y. M., S. E. Fienberg, and P. W. Holland. 1975. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
5. Bradshaw, M. E., and J. P. Doody. 1978. Plant population studies and their relevance to nature conservation. Biological Conservation 14:223-242.
6. Brownlee, K. A. 1960. Statistical theory and methodology in science and engineering. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
7. Byers, D. L. 1993. Determination of genetic and ecological characteristics which result in rarity by comparison of rare and common species of Eupatorium. Dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
8. _. 1995. Pollen quantity and quality as explanations for low seed set in small populations. American Journal of Botany 82:1000-1006.
9. Byers, D. L., and T. R. Meagher. 1992. Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 68:353-359.
10. Caswell, H. 1989. Matrix population models. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
11. Collins, B. R., and W. B. Russell. 1988. Protecting the New Jersey Pinelands: a new direction in land-use management. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
12. Crouse, D. T., L. B. Crowder, and H. Caswell. 1987. A stage-biased population model for loggerhead sea turtle and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-1423.
13. Delph, L. F., and T. R. Meagher. 1995. Sexual dimorphism masks life history trade-offs in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Ecology 76:775-786.
14. DeMauro, M. M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542-550.
15. Eck, P. 1990. The American cranberry. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
16. Fiedler, P. L. 1986. Concepts of rarity in vascular plant species, with special reference to the genus Calochortus Pursh (Liliaceae). Taxon 35:502-518.
17. _. 1987. Life history and population dynamics of rare and common Mariposa Lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology 75:977-995.
18. Fiedler, P. L., and J. H. Ahouse. 1992. Hierarchies of cause: toward an understanding of rarity in vascular plant species. Pages 23-49 in P. L. Fiedler and S. K. Jain, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation preservation and management. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
19. Fiedler, P. L., and S. K. Jain. 1992. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation preservation and management. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
20. Gawler, S. C., D. M. Waller, and E. S. Menges. 1987. Environmental factors affecting establishment and growth of Pedicularis furbishiae, a rare endemic of St. John River Valley, Maine. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 114:280-292.
21. Griggs, R. F. 1940. The ecology of rare plants. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 67:575-594.
22. Gross, K. L. 1981. Prediction of fate from rosette size in four "biennial" plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius. Oecologia (Berlin) 48:209-213.
23. Harrison, S. 1993. Species diversity, spatial scale, and global change. Pages 388-401 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, editors. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
24. Harvey, H. J. 1985. Population biology and the conservation of rare species. Pages 11-126 in J. White, editor. Studies on plant demography: a festschrift for John L. Harper. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
25. Kareiva, P. 1994. Ecological theory and endangered species. Ecology 75:583.
26. Kroon, de H., A. Palisier, J. van Groenendael, and H. Caswell. 1986. Elasticity: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427-1431.
27. Kruckeberg, A. R., and D. Rabinowitz. 1985. Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:447-479.
28. Lande, R. 1988a. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455-1460.
29. _. 1988b. Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). Oecologia (Berlin) 75: 601-607.
30. Lefkovitch, L. P. 1965. The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21:1-18.
31. Macior, L. W. 1980. The edaphic factor in narrow endemism. I. The nature of environmental influences. Madrono 8:241-257.
32. Meagher, T. R. 1982. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the lily family: two-sex population projections and stable population structure. Ecology 63:1701-1711.
33. Meagher, T. R., and J. Antonovics. 1982. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the lily family: life history studies. Ecology 63:1690-1700.
34. Meagher, T. R., J. Antonovics, and R. Primack. 1978. Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. III. Genetic variation and demography in relation to survival of Plantago cordata, a rare species. Biological Conservation 14: 243-257.
35. Mehrhoff, L. A. 1989. The dynamics of declining populations of an endangered orchid, Isotria medeoloides. Ecology 70:783-786.
36. Menges, E. S. 1986. Predicting the future of rare plant populations, demographic monitoring and modeling. Natural Areas Journal 6:13-25.
37. _. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant. Conservation Biology 4:52-62.
38. Mowbray, T. B. 1985. Final status report: Eupatorium resinosum Torrey ex D.C. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report, Endangered Species Office, Asheville, North Carolina.
39. Primack, R. B., and P. Hall. 1990. Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. American Naturalist 136:638-656.
40. Primack, R. B., S. L. Miao, and K. R. Becker. 1994. Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule): defoliation, increased fruit production, and fire. American Journal of Botany 81:1083-1090.
41. Raven, P. H. 1987. The scope of the plant conservation problem world-wide. Pages 19-20 in D. Bramwell, O. Hamann, V. Heywood, and H. Synge, editors. Botanic gardens and the world conservation strategy. Academic Press, London, England.
42. Reinartz, J. A., and D. H. Les. 1994. Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster futcatus. American Journal of Botany 81:446-455.
43. Robichaud, B., and M. F. Buell. 1983. Vegetation of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
44. Russo, M. J. 1995. Element stewardship abstract on Eupatorium resinosum Torrey ex DC. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
45. SAS. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
46. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillie, I. M. Parker, and J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-606.
47. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical methods. Seventh edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
48. Sullivan, V. I. 1976. Diploidy, polyploidy, and agamospermy among species of Eupatorium (Compositae). Canadian Journal of Botany 54:2907-2917.
49. Werner, P. A., and H. Caswell. 1977. Population growth rates and age versus stage-distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecology 58:1103-1111.
50. Wilson, E. O. 1988. The current state of biological diversity. Pages 3-20 in E. O. Wilson, editor. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
51. Wolfram, S. 1991. Mathematica. Second edition. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California, USA.