Population-level effects of augmented herbivory on Lespedeza cuneata: Implications for biological control

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 965-971

  Schutzenhofer, Michele R ^a,b   Knight, Tiffany M ^b  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Compensation; Demography; Elasticity analysis; Enemy release; Fitness; Growth rate; Invasive; Lespedeza cuneata; Matrix modeling; Simulated herbivory; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; DEMOGRAPHY; DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; GROWTH RATE; HERBIVORY; INVASIVE SPECIES; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; TOLERANCE;

LESPEDEZA; LESPEDEZA CUNEATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INSECT; LESPEDEZA;

ANIMALS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INSECTS; LESPEDEZA;

EID: 34447120686     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-1282     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ansley, W. 1960. The influence of time and frequency of cutting on persistence, forage yield, seed yield, and seed type of sericea lespedeza. Thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
2. Bastrenta, B., J. D. Lebreton, and J. D. Thompson. 1995. Predicting demographic change in response to herbivory - a model of the effects of grazing and annual variation on the population-dynamics of Anthyllis-Vulneraria. Journal of Ecology 83:603-611.
3. Bigger, D., and M. Marvier. 1998. How different would a world without herbivory be? A search for generality in ecology. Integrative Biology 1:60-67.
4. Buckingham, G. 1994. Biological control of aquatic weeds. Pages 413-480 in D. Rosen, F. D. Bennett, and J. L. Capinera, editors. Pest management in the subtropics: biological control - a Florida perspective. Intercept, Andover, UK.
5. Cahill, J. F. 2002. What evidence is necessary in studies which separate root and shoot competition along productivity gradients? Journal of Ecology 90:201-205.
6. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
7. Colautti, R. I., A. Ricciardi, I. A. Grigorovich, and H. J. MacIsaac. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters 7:721-733.
8. Crawley, M. J. 1989. Insect herbivores and plant-population dynamics. Annual Review of Entomology 34:531-564.
9. Crawley, M. J. 1997. Plant-herbivore dynamics. Pages 401-474 in M. J. Crawley, editor. Plant ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
10. Debach, P. 1974. Biological control by natural enemies. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
11. de Kroon, H., A. Plaisier, J. M. van Groenendael, and H. Caswell. 1986. Elasticities: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427-1431.
12. Donnelly, E. D. 1955. The effects of outcrossing on forage and seed yields in sericea lespedeza, L. cuneata. Agronomy Journal 47:466-467.
13. Eddy, T. A., and C. M. Moore. 1998. Effects of sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don) invasion on oak savannas in Kansas. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters 86:57-62.
14. Ehrlén, J., K. Syrjanen, R. Leimu, M. B. Garcia, and K. Lehtilä. 2005. Land use and population growth of Primula veris: an experimental demographic approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:317-326.
15. Hall, R., L. Ehler, and B. Bisbabri-Ershadi. 1980. Rate of success in classical biological control of arthropods. Journal of the Entomological Society of America 26:111-114.
16. Hjalten, J. 2004. Simulating herbivory: problems and possibilities. Pages 243-256 in W. Weisser and E. Siemann, editors. Insects and ecosystem function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
17. Hoveland, S. C., and E. D. Donnelly. 1985. The Lespedezas. Pages 128-135 in M. E. Heath, editor. Forages: the science of grass agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
18. Julien, M. H., and M. W. Griffiths. 1998. Biological control of weeds: world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. Fourth edition. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
19. Keane, R. M., and M. J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164-170.
20. Knight, T. M. 2004. The effect of herbivory and pollen limitation on a declining population of Trillium grandiflorum. Ecological Applications 14:915-928.
21. Lehtilä, K., and E. Boalt. 2004. The use and usefulness of artificial herbivory in plant-herbivore studies. Pages 257-275 in W. Weisser and E. Siemann, editors. Insects and ecosystem function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
22. Leimu, R., and K. Lehtilä. 2006. Effects of two types of herbivores on the population dynamics of a perennial herb. Basic and Applied Ecology 7:224-235.
23. Louda, S. M., and P. Stiling. 2004. The double-edged sword of biological control in conservation and restoration. Conservation Biology 18:50-53.
24. McFadyen, R. E. C. 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 43:369-393.
25. McKee, R., and H. L. Hyland. 1941. Apetalous and petaliferous flowers in Lespedeza. American Society of Agronomy Journal 33:811-815.
26. Messing, R. H., and M. G. Wright. 2006. Biological control of invasive species: solution or pollution? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:132-140.
27. Myers, J. H. 1984. How many insect species are necessary for successful biocontrol of weeds? Pages 77-82 in E. S. Delfosse, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, Agriculture. Canadian Government, Printing Office, Ottawa, Canada.
28. Myers, J. H., and C. Risley. 2000. Why reduced seed production is not necessarily translated into successful biological control. Pages 596-581 in N. Spencer, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. USDA-ARS and Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
29. Paige, K. N., B. Williams, and T. Hickox. 2001. Overcompensation through the paternal component of fitness in Ipomopsis arizonica. Oecologia 128:72-76.
30. Parker, I. M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10:726-743.
31. Pearson, D. E., and R. M. Callaway. 2003. Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:456-461.
32. Pimentel, D., L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.
33. Pratt, P. D., M. B. Rayamajhi, T. K. Van, T. D. Center, and P. W. Tipping. 2005. Herbivory alters resource allocation and compensation in the invasive tree Melaleuca quinquenervia. Ecological Entomology 30:316-326.
34. Raghu, S., and K. Dhileepan. 2005. The value of simulating herbivory in selecting effective weed biological control agents. Biological Control 34:265-273.
35. Schierenbeck, K. A., R. N. Mack, and R. R. Sharitz. 1994. Effects of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera. Ecology 75:1661-1672.
36. Shea, K., and D. Kelly. 1998. Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecological Applications 8:824-832.
37. Sheley, R., J. Petroff, and M. Borman. 1999. Introduction to biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
38. Siemann, E., and W. E. Rogers. 2003. Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation, and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84:1489-1505.
39. Silvertown, J., M. Franco, I. Pisanty, and A. Mendoza. 1993. Comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology 81:465-476.
40. Steets, J. A., and T. L. Ashman. 2004. Herbivory alters the expression of a mixed-mating system. American Journal of Botany 91:1046-1051.
41. Steets, J. A., T. M. Knight, and T.-L. Ashman. 2007. The interactive effects of herbivory and mixed mating for the population dynamics of Impatiens capenis. American Naturalist, in press.
42. Stowe, K. A., R. J. Marquis, C. G. Hochwender, and E. L. Simms. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:565-595.
43. Strauss, S. Y., and A. A. Agrawal. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179-185.