A protein block based fold recognition method for the annotation of twilight zone sequences

Protein and Peptide Letters

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 249-254

  Suresh, V ^a   Ganesan, K ^a   Parthasarathy, S ^a  

^a BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Local protein structure; Pairwise local alignment; Protein block; Protein folds recognition; Secondary structure; Structural alphabet; Twilight zone sequences

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLD RECOGNITION METHOD; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TWILIGHT ZONE SEQUENCE; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84877991183     PISSN: 09298665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/092986613804910617     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Yan, R.J.; Si, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z. DescFold: A web server for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009, 10, 416.
2. Needleman, S.B.; Wunsch, C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1970, 48(3), 443-453.
3. Smith, T.F.; Waterman, M.S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol., 1981, 147(1), 195-197.
4. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215(3), 403-410.
5. Pearson, W.R. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol., 1990, 183, 63-98.
6. Doolittle, R.F. Of urfs and orfs: A primer on how to analyze derived amino acid sequences.; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1986.
7. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25(17), 3389-3402.
8. Schaffer, A.A.; Wolf, Y.I.; Ponting, C.P.; Koonin, E.V.; Aravind, L.; Altschul, S.F. IMPALA: matching a protein sequence against a collection of PSI-BLAST-constructed position-specific score matrices. Bioinformatics, 1999, 15(12), 1000-1011.
9. Bowie, J.U.; Luthy, R.; Eisenberg, D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science, 1991, 253, 164-169.
10. Jones, D.T.; Taylor, W.R.; Thornton, J.M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature, 1992, 358(6381), 86-9.
11. Jaroszewski, L.; Rychlewski, L.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Godzik, A. FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic. Acids Res., 2005, 33(suppl 2), W284-W288.
12. Kelley, L.A.; MacCallum, R.M.; Sternberg, M.J. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol., 2000, 299(2), 499-520.
13. Shi, J.; Blundell, T.L.; Mizuguchi, K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 310(1), 243-257.
14. McGuffin, L.J.; Jones, D.T. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19(7), 874-881.
15. Ginalski, K.; Pas, J.; Wyrwicz, L.S.; von Grotthuss, M.; Bujnicki, J.M.; Rychlewski, L. ORFeus: Detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic. Acids Res., 2004, 31(13), 3804-3807.
16. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y. MUSTER: Improving protein sequence profileprofile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins, 2008, 72(2), 547-556.
17. Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Y. SP5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS. ONE, 2008, 3(6), e2325.
18. Ganesan, K.; Parthasarathy. S. PSS-3D1D: An improved 3D1D profile method of protein fold recognition for the annotation of twilight zone sequences. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 2011, 12(4), 181-189.
19. Russell, R.B.; Copley, R.R.; Barton, G.J. Protein fold prediction from secondary structure assignment, Proc. 29th Ann. Hawaii. Int. Conf. Sys. Sci., IEEE press. 1995, V, 302-311.
20. Offmann, B.; Tyagi, M.; de Brevern, A.G. Local protein structures. Curr. Bioinf., 2007, 3, 165-202.
21. de Brevern, A.G.; Etchebest, C.; Hazout, S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins, 2000, 41, 271-287.
22. de Brevern, A.G. New assessment of a structural alphabet. In. Silico. Biol., 2005, 5, 283-289.
23. de Brevern, A.G.; Valadie, H.; Hazout, S.; Etchebest, C. Extension of a local backbone description using a structural alphabet: a new approach to the sequence-structure relationship. Protein Sci., 2002, 11, 2871-2886.
24. de Brevern, A.G.; Etchebest, C.; Benros, C.; Hazout, S. "Pinning strategy": a novel approach for predicting the backbone structure in terms of protein blocks from sequence. J. Biosci., 2007, 32, 51-70.
25. Joseph, A.P.; Agarwal, G.; Mahajan, S.; Gelly, J.C.; Swapna, L.S.; Offmann, B.; Cadet, F.; Bornot, A.; Tyagi, M.; Valadié, H.; Schneider, B.; Etchebest, C.; Srinivasan, N.; de Brevern, A.G. A short survey on Protein Blocks. Biophys. Rev., 2010, 2(3), 137-145.
26. Benros, C.; de Brevern, A.G.; Etchebest, C.; Hazout, S. Assessing a novel approach for predicting local 3D protein structures from sequence. Proteins, 2006, 62, 865-880.
27. Benros, C.; de Brevern, A.G.; Hazout, S. Analyzing the sequence structure relationship of a library of local structural prototypes. J. Theor. Biol., 2009, 256, 215-226.
28. Bornot, A.; Etchebest, C.; de Brevern, A.G. A new prediction strategy for long local protein structures using an original description. Proteins, 2009, 76, 570-587.
29. de Brevern, A.G.; Hazout, S. Hybrid Protein Model (HPM): a method to compact protein 3D-structures information and physicochemical properties. IEEE-Computer. Soc., 2000, S1, 49-54.
30. de Brevern, A.G.; Hazout, S. 'Hybrid protein model' for optimally defining 3D protein structure fragments. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19, 345-353.
31. Fourrier, L.; Benros, C.; de Brevern, A.G. Use of a structural alphabet for analysis of short loops connecting repetitive structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 2004, 5, 58.
32. Tyagi, M.; Bornot, A.; Offmann, B.; de Brevern, A.G. Analysis of loop boundaries using different local structure assignment methods. Protein Sci., 2009, 18, 1869-1881.
33. Tyagi, M.; Bornot, A.; Offmann, B.; de Brevern, A.G. Protein short loop prediction in terms of a structural alphabet. Comput. Biol. Chem., 2009, 33, 329-333.
34. Faure, G.; Bornot, A.; de Brevern, A.G. Protein contacts, interresidue interactions and side-chain modelling. Biochimie, 2008, 90, 626-639.
35. Dong, Q.W.; Wang, X.L.; Lin, L. Methods for optimizing the structure alphabet sequences of proteins. Comput. Biol., 2007, 37, 1610-1616.
36. de Brevern, A.G. New opportunities to fight against infectious diseases and to identify pertinent drug targets with novel methodologies. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets, 2009, 9, 246-247.
37. de Brevern, A.G.; Autin, L.; Colin, Y.; Bertrand, O.; Etchebest, C. In silico studies on DARC. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets, 2009, 9, 289-303.
38. de Brevern, A.G.; Wong, H.; Tournamille, C.; Colin, Y.; Le Van Kim, C.; Etchebest, C. A structural model of a seventransmembrane helix receptor: the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokine (DARC). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2005, 1724(3), 288-306.
39. Dudev, M.; Lim, C. Discovering structural motifs using a structural alphabet: application to magnesium-binding sites. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007, 8, 106.
40. Etchebest, C.; Benros, C.; Bornot, A.; Camproux, A.C.; de Brevern, A.G. A reduced amino acid alphabet for understanding and designing protein adaptation to mutation. Eur. Biophys. J., 2007, 36, 1059-1069.
41. Tyagi, M.; Gowri, V.S.; Srinivasan, N.; de Brevern, A.G.; Offmann, B. A substitution matrix for structural alphabet based on structural alignment of homologous proteins and its applications. Proteins, 2006, 65, 32-39.
42. Tyagi, M.; Sharma, P.; Swamy, C.S.; Cadet, F.; Srinivasan, N.; de Brevern, A.G.; Offmann, B. Protein Block Expert (PBE): a webbased protein structure analysis server using a structural alphabet. Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, 34, W119-W123.
43. Tyagi, M.; de Brevern, A.G.; Srinivasan, N.; Offmann, B. Protein structure mining using a structural alphabet. Proteins, 2008, 71, 920-937.
44. Karchin, R.; Cline, M.; Mandel-Gutfreund, Y.; Karplus, K. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins, 2003, 51, 504-514.
45. http://bioinformatics.univ-reunion.fr/PBE/pb-prediction/
46. Murzin, A.G.; Brenner, S.E.; Hubbard, T.; Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 1995, 247(4), 536-40.
47. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, 28, 235-242.
48. Kelley, L.A.; Sutcliffe, M.J. OLDERADO: on-line database of ensemble representatives and domains. Protein Sci., 1997, 6(12), 2628-2630.
49. Pearson, W.R. Empirical statistical estimates for sequence similarity searches. J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 276, 71-84.
50. Mitrophanov, A.Y.; Borodovsky, M. Statistical significance in biological sequence analysis. Briefings. Bioinf., 2006, 7, 2-24.
51. Gribskov, M.; Robinson, N.L. Use of receiver operating characteristic (roc) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Comput. Chem., 1996, 20, 25-33.