The inclusion of non-market values in systematic conservation planning to enhance policy relevance

Biological Conservation

Volumn 162, Issue , 2013, Pages 65-75

  Rogers, Abbie A ^a   Cleland, Jonelle A ^a   Burton, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Non market valuation; Policy; Public and expert preferences; Social benefits; Systematic conservation planning

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOREGION; EXPERT SYSTEM; HABITAT CONSERVATION;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84877916573     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006. Census For a Brighter Future. Australian Government, Canberra. (accessed September 2010). http://www.abs.gov.au/census.
2. Ball I.R., Possingham H.P., Watts M. Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools 2009, 16-27. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
3. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
4. Bennett J., Blamey R. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
5. Bennett J., Dumsday R., Howell G., Lloyd C., Sturgess N., Van Raalte L. The economic value of improved environmental health in Victorian rivers. Australas. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 15:138-148.
6. Carlsson F., Kataria M., Lampi E. Do EPA administrators recommend environmental policies that citizens want?. Land Econ. 2011, 87:60-74.
7. Caussade S., Ortúzar J.D., Rizzi L.I., Hensher D.A. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiments. Transp. Res. Part B 2005, 39:621-640.
8. Cleland, J., McCartney, A., 2010. Putting the Spotlight on Attribute Definition: Divergence Between Experts and the Public. EERH Research Report N-77. Environmental Economics Research Hub, Canberra.
9. Cleland, J., Rogers, A., 2010. Putting the Spotlight on Attribute Definition: A Knowledge Base Approach. EERH Research Report N-79. Environmental Economics Research Hub, Canberra.
10. DeShazo J.R., Fermo G. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2002, 44:123-173.
11. Environment Australia A Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia 2001, Environment Australia, Canberra. third ed.
12. Environment Australia, 2011, Biodiversity Hotspots. Australian Government, Canberra. (accessed November 2011). http://environment.gov.au/biodiversity/hotspots/index.html.
13. Environmental Protection Authority, 2001. Environmental Protection of Wetlands. Position Statement N-4. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth.
14. Gole C. The Southwest Australia Ecoregion Jewel of the Australian Continent 2006, Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative, Wembley.
15. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Hermoso, V., Kennard, M., Linke, S., 2010. A complementary approach to identifying HCVAEs - systematic conservation planning. In: Kennard, M.J. (Eds.), Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems in Northern Australia. Interim Report for the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and the National Water Commission, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, pp. 128-237.
17. Knight A.T. Failing but learning: writing the wrongs after Redford and Taber. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:1312-1314.
18. Louviere J.J. Choice experiments: an overview of concepts and issues. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Evaluation 2001, 13-36. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. J. Bennett, R. Blamey (Eds.).
19. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods Analysis and Application 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Maiorano L., Bartolino V., Colloca F., Abella A., Belluscio A., Carpentieri P., Criscoli A., Jona Lasinio G., Mannini A., Pranovi F., Reale B., Relini G., Viva C., Ardizzone G.D. Systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean: a flexible tool for the identification of no-take marine protected areas. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 66:137-146.
21. Margules C.R., Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 2000, 405:243-253.
22. McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econ. 2000, 15:447-470.
23. Morrison M., Hatton MacDonald D. A comparison of compensating surplus and budget reallocation with opportunity costs specified. Appl. Econ. 2011, 43:4677-4688.
24. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
25. NRMMC (Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council), 2010. Australia's Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2010-2030. Australian Government, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra.
26. Olsen S.B. Choosing between internet and mail survey modes for choice experiment surveys considering non-market goods. Environ. Resource Econ. 2009, 44:591-610.
27. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., 1997. The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving Earth's Distinctive Ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC.
28. Pierce S.M., Cowling R.M., Knight A.T., Lombard A.T., Rouget M., Wolf T. Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: interpretation for implementation. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 125:441-458.
29. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13:484-492.
30. Pressey R.L., Bottrill M.C. Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:1340-1345.
31. Pressey R.L., Taffs K.H. Scheduling priority conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biol. Conserv. 2001, 100:345-376.
32. Pressey R.L., Cowling R.M., Rouget M. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 112:99-127.
33. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431.
34. Rogers A. Public and expert preference divergence: evidence from a choice experiment of marine reserves in Australia. Land Econ. 2013, 89:346-370.
35. Rogers, A., Cleland, J., 2010. Comparing Scientist and Public Preferences for Conserving Environmental Systems: A Case of the Kimberley's Tropical Waterways and Wetlands. EERH Research Report N-80. Environmental Economics Research Hub, Canberra.
36. Rolfe J., Windle J. Valuing options for reserve water in the Fitzroy Basin. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2005, 49:91-114.
37. Rose, J.M., Collins, A.T., Bliemer, M.C.J., Hensher, D.A., 2008. Ngene 1.0. Statistical Software.
38. Scarpa R., Rose J.M. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2008, 52:253-282.
39. Smith R.J., Goodman P.S., Matthews W.S. Systematic conservation planning: a review of perceived limitations and an illustration of the benefits, using a case study from Maputaland, South Africa. Oryx 2006, 40:400-410.
40. StataCorp, 2009. Stata, Release 11. Statistical Software.
41. Stattersfield, A.J., Crosby, M.J., Long, A.J., Wege, D.C., 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series 7. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
42. Swait J. Advanced choice models. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice 2006, 111-133. Springer, The Netherlands. B.J. Kanninen (Ed.).
43. Swait J., Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Mark. Res. 1993, 30:305-314.
44. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. second ed.
45. Wilson K.A., Westphal M.I., Possingham H.P., Elith J. Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 122:99-112.
46. Wilson K.A., Cabeza M., Klein C.J. Fundamental concepts of spatial conservation prioritization. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools 2009, 16-27. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
47. Windle J., Rolfe J. Comparing responses from internet and paper-based collection methods in more complex stated preference environmental valuation surveys. Econ. Anal. Policy 2011, 41:83-97.
48. WWF and IUCN, 1995. Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for Their Conservation, vol. 2. Asia, Australasia and the Pacific. IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge.
49. WWF-Australia (World Wildlife Fund Australia), 2009. Conservation Plan Aims to Save Australia's Only Biodiversity Hotspot. WWF, Sydney. (accessed November 2011). http://www.wwf.org.au/news_resources/?1610/Conservation-plan-aims-to-save-Australias-only-biodiversity-hotspot.
50. WWF-Australia (World Wildlife Fund Australia), 2010. A Strategic Regional Conservation Plan for Australia's Global Biodiversity Hotspot: Phase 1 Report. Report to the Australian Government. WWF-Australia, Wembley.
51. WWF-Australia (World Wildlife Fund Australia), in press. Regional Framework for the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Southwest Australia Ecoregion. Report A: For Decision-makers and Practitioners. Report to the Australian Government. WWF-Australia, Wembley.