Social commerce: The role of trust

18th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2012, AMCIS 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 201-211

  Hajli, Mahmood ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION MODEL; E-COMMERCE ADOPTION; E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS; INTENTION TO BUIES; SOCIAL COMMERCES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SURVEY DATA; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 84877914959     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ajzen, I.(1985).Fromintentionstoactions:atheoryofplannedbehavior: inaction control: Fromcognitiontobehavior. Kuhland,J.,&Beckman,J.(Eds),Springer,Heidelberg:11 39
2. Bell, J. (2010). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. 5th Edition, London: Open University.
3. Chin WW. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 1998; 22(1):vii-xvi.
4. Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation. Information Systems Research (8:4), pp. 342-367
5. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., Dexter, A.S. (2001). Research report: empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research (12), 304-321
6. Davis, F. D. (1989).Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User Acceptance of Information Technologies.MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), pp.319-340
7. Davis, R., Bagozzi, P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003
8. Fisher, S. (2010, February).Social Commerce Camp - Killer Social Commerce Experience. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/stevenfisher/social-commerce-camp-killer-social-commerce-experience
9. Gefen, D., & Straub, W. (2000). The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease-of-Use in IS Adoption: A Study of Ecommerce Adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1 (8), pp.1-30
10. Gefen, D. (2000). Ecommerce role familiarity trust. The international journal of management science,32 pp.725-737
11. Grazioli, S., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2000).Perils of Internet fraud. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 30, 4, 395-410
12. Han, B., & Windsor, J. (2010).USER'S WILLINGNESS TO PAY ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES, Journal of Computer Information Systems,Summer 2011
13. Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1998). Social Capital and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 47-73
14. King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S., (1994).Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press's, ISBN: 9780691034713
15. KUMAR, R., NOVAK, J., AND TOMKINS, A. (2006).Structure and evolution of online social networks. In Proc. of ACM SIGKDDInternational Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
16. Lorenzo, C., Constantinides, E., Geurts, P., & Gómez, M. (2007).Impact of Web Experience on e-Consumer Responses. In E-Commerce and Web Technologies (pp. 191-200). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74563-1_19
17. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information systems research, 1991, available at isr.journal.informs.org.
18. Mutz, D. C. (2005). Social Trust and E-Commerce, Experimental Evidence for the Effects of Social Trust on Individuals' Economic Behavior, Oxford Journals, Social Sciences, Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 69, Issue3, Pp. 393-416
19. Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce archive Volume 7, Issue 3
20. Paxton, P. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment. American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 88-127
21. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, Raffaella Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey Research, 2nd ed,London: Sage.
23. Straub, D.W. (1989). Validating instrument in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 12 (2), 147-170
24. Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M. C. and Gefen, D. (2004).Validation guidelines for IS positivist research, Communications of the Communications of the Association for Information Systems, available at www.aisnet.org.
25. Swamynathan, G., Wilson, Ch., Boe, B., Almeroth, K. and Zhao.B.Y. (2008).Do social networks improve e-commerce a study on social marketplaces, NY, USA.
26. Warren, M. E. (1999). Introduction. In Democracy and Trust, e d. MarkE. Warren,p p. 1-21. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Wixom, B. H. & Watson, H. J., "An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing", MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, 17-41
28. Wu, B., Ye, Q., Yang, S., & Wang, B. (2009). Group CRM: a new telecom CRM framework from social network perspective. In Proceeding of the 1st ACM international workshop on Complex networks meet information & knowledge management (pp. 3-10). Hong Kong, China: ACM. doi:10.1145/1651274.1651277
29. Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2011).Product-Related Deception in E-Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective, MIS Quarterly, (35: 1) pp.169-195.Page 14.