Erratum to: Salt or Sludge? Exploring Preferences for Potable Water Sources (Environ Resource Econ, 10.1007/s10640-013-9672-9);Salt or Sludge? Exploring Preferences for Potable Water Sources

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 453-476

  Gibson, Fiona L ^a   Burton, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Non market valuation; Recycled wastewater

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; POTABLE WATER; SURVEYS;

ATTITUDES; CONTEXT MATTERS; DECISION MAKERS; ECONOMIC INCENTIVE; NON-MARKET VALUATION; PUBLIC ATTITUDES; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; STATED PREFERENCES;

WATER RECYCLING;

EID: 84877903926     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: 15731502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-013-9734-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Aertsens J, Verbeke W, Mondelaers K, Van Huylenbroeck G (2009) Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. British Food J 111:1140–1167
2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 50:179–211
3. Ajzen I (2011) Theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 26:1113–11127
4. Alberini A (1995) Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: single-bound, double-bound and bivariate models. J Environ Econ Manag 28:287–306
5. Araña JE, León CJ (2008) Repeated dichotomous formats for eliciting willingness to pay: simultaneous estimation and anchoring effects. Environ Resour Econ 36:75–497
6. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman EH (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, report to the General Counsel of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Resources for the Future, Washington
7. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007) 2006 Census Perth population and housing. www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3222.0. [14 September 2011]
8. Barrett P (2007) Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Pers Individ Differ 42:815–824
9. Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economics valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, London
10. Ben-Akiva M, McFadden D, Gärling T, Gopinath D, Walker J, Bolduc D, Börsch-supan A, Delquié P, Larichev O, Morikawa T, Polydoropoulou A, Rao V (1999) Extended framework for modelling choice behaviour. Mark Lett 10:187–203
11. Blamey R, Gordon J, Chapman R (1999) Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 43(3):337–357
12. Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ (2007) Preferences with and without process—does the price attribute affect behaviour in stated preference surveys? Environ Resour Econ 38:155–164
13. Carson RT, Groves T (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ Resour Econ 37:181–210
14. Carson RT, Louviere JJ (2011) A common nomenclature for stated preference elicitation approaches. Environ Resour Econ 49:539–559
15. Carson KS, Chilton SM, Hutchinson WG (2009) Necessary conditions for demand revelation in double referenda. J Environ Econ Manag 57:219–225
16. Cook AJ, Kerr GN, Moore K (2002) Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. J Econ Psychol 23:557–572
17. DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J Econ Lit 47:315–372
18. Dolnicar S, Schäfer AI (2009) Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. J Environ Manag 90:888–900
19. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Grün B (2011) What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Res 45:933–943
20. East R (1993) Investment decisions and the theory of planned behaviour. J Econ Psychol 14:337–375
21. Gibson FL, Burton M (2011) Determining the change in welfare estimates from introducing measurement error in non-linear choice models. Working paper 1110, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia
22. Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Education International, New Jersey
23. Hanemann MW (2006) The economic concept of water. In: Rogers PP, Llamas MR, Cortina LM (eds) Water crisis: myth or reality?. Taylor and Francis, London
24. Hanemann MW, Kanninen B (1999) The statistical analysis of discrete-response data. In: Bateman IJ, Willis KG (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. Hanemann WM, Loomis JB, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 73:1255–1263
26. Hartley TW (2006) Public perception and participation in water reuse. Desalination 187:115–126
27. Hurlimann AC (2009) Water supply in regional Victoria Australia: a review of the water cartage industry and willingness to pay for recycled water. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:262–268
28. Hurlimann AC, McKay J (2007) Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use: an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis. J Environ Manag 83:93–104
29. Kriström B (1997) Spike models in contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 79:1013–1023
30. Lindhjem H, Navrud S (2011) Are internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? Ecol Econ 70:1628–1637
31. Marks J, Martin B, Zadoroznyj M (2008) How Australians order acceptance of recycled water: national baseline data. J Sociol 44(1):83–99
32. McFadden D (1999) Rationality for economists? J Risk Uncertain 19:73–105
33. Meerganz von Medeazza GL (2005) Direct and socially-induced environmental impacts of desalination. Desalination 185:57–70
34. Morikawa T, Ben-Akiva M, McFadden D (2002) Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. Econom Models Mark 16:29–55
35. Muthèn LK, Muthèn BO (2007) Mplus users guide, 5th edn. Muthèn and Muthèn, Los Angeles
36. Muthèn BO, Satorra A (1995) Technical aspects of Muthèn’s LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika 60(4):489–503
37. Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Po M, Porter NB, Tucker DI (2008) What drives communities’ decisions and behaviour in the reuse of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 57:485–491
38. National Water Commission (2007) The cost-effectiveness of rainwater tanks in urban Australia. Marsden Jacob Associates, Australia
39. Neill HR, Cummings RG, Ganderton PT, Harrison GW, McGuckin T (1994) Hypothetical survey’s and real economic commitments. Land Econ 70:145–154
40. Olsen SB (2009) Choosing between internet and mail survey modes for choice experiment surveys considering non-market goods. Environ Resour Econ 44:592–610
41. Pidgeon NF, Lorenzoni I, Poortinga W (2008) Climate change or nuclear power—no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Glob Environ Change 18:69–85
42. Poe GL, Giraud KL, Loomis JB (2005) Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. Am J Agric Econ 87:353–365
43. Porter NB, Leviston Z, Nancarrow BE, Po M, Syme GJ (2005) Interpreting householder preferences to evaluate water supply systems: an attitudinal model. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, Perth
44. Pouta E (2004) Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey. J Econ Psychol 25:229–242
45. Ready RC, Champ PA, Lawton JL (2010) Using respondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experiment. Land Econ 86:363–381
46. Rodriguez C, Van Buynder P, Lugg R, Blair P, Devine B, Cook A, Weinstein P (2009) Indirect potable reuse: a sustainable water supply alternative. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:1174–1209
47. Scarpa R, Thiene M (2011) Organic food choices and protection motivation theory: addressing the psychological sources of heterogeneity. Food Quality Preference 22:532–541
48. Scheufele G, Bennett J (2012) Response strategies and learning in discrete choice experiments. Environ Res Econ 52:435–453
49. Shwom R, Dan A, Dietz T (2008) The effects of information and state of residence on climate change policy preferences. Clim Change 90:343–358
50. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2005) Structural equation modelling: categorical variables. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioural science. Wiley, New York
51. Train KE, McFadden DL, Goett AA (1987) Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities. Rev Econ Stat 69:383–391
52. Tsiourtis NX (2001) Desalination and the environment. Desalination 141:223–236
53. Veronesi M, Alberini A, Cooper JC (2011) Implications of bid design and willingness-to-pay distribution for starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Environ Resour Econ 49:199–215
54. Water Corporation (2006) Desalinisation. Paper prepared for the Australian State of the Environment Committee, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra
55. Water Corporation (2009) Water forever: towards climate resilience. Water Corporation: Perth. Available from: Water Corporation. [30 November 2010]
56. Weinstein ND (1993) Testing four competing theories of health-protective behaviour. Health Psychol 12: 324–333