Fibronectin and vitronectin promote human fetal osteoblast cell attachment and proliferation on nanoporous titanium surfaces

Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1092-1097

  Rivera Chacon, D M ^a   Alvarado Velez, M ^a   Acevedo Morantes, C Y ^a   Singh, S P ^a,c   Gultepe, E ^b   Nagesha, D ^b   Sridhar, S ^b   Ramirez Vick, J E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

Fibronectin; HFOB 1.19; Nanoporous TiO2; Protein adsorption; Vitronectin

Indexed keywords

FIBRONECTIN; HFOB 1.19; NANO-POROUS TIO; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; VITRONECTIN;

BODY FLUIDS; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

PROTEINS;

FIBRONECTIN; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; VITRONECTIN;

ARTICLE; BONE CONDUCTION; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NANOFABRICATION; NANOPORE; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FIBRONECTINS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; VITRONECTIN;

EID: 84877840005     PISSN: 15507033     EISSN: 15507041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1601     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. T. Albrektsson and C. Johansson, Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration, Eur. Spine J. 10, S96 (2001).
2. D. M. Ehrenfest, P. G. Coelho, B. S. Kang, Y. T. Sul, and T. Albrektsson, Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: Materials, chemistry and topography, Trends Biotechnol. 28, 198 (2010).
3. T. Albrektsson, P. I. Bränemark, H. A. Hansson, and J. Lindström, Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 52, 155 (1981).
4. S. Roessler, R. Zimmermann, D. Scharnweber, C. Werner, and H. Worch, Characterization of oxide layers on Ti6Al4V and titanium by streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Coll. Surf. B: Biointer. 26, 387 (2002).
5. B. L. Gabriel, J. Gold, A. G. Gristina, B. Kasemo, J. Lausmaa, C. Harrer, and Q. N. Myrvik, Site-specific adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis (RP12) in Ti-Al-V metal systems. Biomaterials 15, 628 (1994).
6. T. Hanawa, Titanium and its oxide film: a substrate for the formation of apatite. The Bone-Biomaterial Interface, edited by J. E. Davies, University of Teorsonto Press, Toronto (1991), p. 49.
7. T. Hanawa, K. Asami, and K. Asaoka, Repassivation of titanium and surface oxide film regenerated in simulated bioliquid. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40, 530 (1998).
8. T. Hanawa and M. Ota, Calcium phosphate naturally formed on titanium in electrolyte solution. Biomaterials 12, 767 (1991).
9. K. Anselme, Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21, 667 (2000).
10. C. A. Scotchford, M. Ball, M. Winkelmann, J. Vörös, C. Csucs, D. M. Brunette, G. Danuser, and M. Textor, Chemically patterned, metal-oxide-based surfaces produced by photolithographic techniques for studying protein- and cell-interactions. II: Protein adsorption and early cell interactions. Biomaterials 24, 1147 (2003).
11. J. G. Steele, C. McFarland, B. A. Dalton, G. Johnson, M. D. Evans, C. R. Howlett, and P. A. Underwood, Attachment of human bone cells to tissue culture polystyrene and to unmodified polystyrene: The effect of surface chemistry upon initial cell attachment. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 5, 245 (1993).
12. C. R. Howlett, M. D. Evans, W. R. Walsh, G. Johnson, and J. G. Steele, Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell culture. Biomaterials 15, 213 (1994).
13. K. L. Kilpadi, P. L. Chang, and S. L. Bellis, Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins, and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 57, 258 (2001).
14. A. Yamaguchi, T. Komori, and T. Suda, Regulation of osteoblast differentiation mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins, hedgehogs and cbfa1. Endocr. Rev. 21, 393 (2000).
15. A. J. García, Get a grip: Integrins in cell-biomaterial interactions. Biomaterials 26, 7525 (2005).
16. A. De Arcangelis and E. Georges-Labouesse, Integrin and ECM functions: Roles in vertebrate development, Trends Genet. 16, 389 (2000).
17. S. K. Sastry and K. Burridge, Focal adhesions: A nexus for intra-cellular signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics. Exp. Cell. Res. 261, 25 (2000).
18. N. Zamurovic, D. Cappellen, D. Rohner, and M. Susa, Coordinated activation of notch, Wnt, and transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathways in bone morphogenic protein 2-induced osteogenesis. Notch target gene Hey1 inhibits mineralization and Runx2 transcriptional activity. Biol. Chem. 279, 37704 (2004).
19. R. O. Hynes, Integrins: Bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110, 673 (2002).
20. G. Xiao, R. Gopalakrishnan, D. Jiang, E. Reith, M. D. Benson, and R. T. Franceschi, Bone morphogenetic proteins, extracellular matrix, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways are required for osteoblast-specific gene expression and differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17, 101 (2002).
21. C. J. Wilson, R. E. Clegg, D. I. Leavesley, and M. J. Pearcy, Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng. 11, 1 (2005).
22. R. Eckert, S. Jeney, and J. K. Hörber, Understanding intercellular interactions and cell adhesion: Lessons from studies on protein-metal interactions. Cell Biol. Int. 21, 707 (1997).
23. P. Roach, D. Farrar, and C. C. Perry, Interpretation of protein adsorption: Surface-induced conformational changes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 8168 (2005).
24. M. N. Sela, L. Badihi, G. Rosen, D. Steinberg, and D. Kohavi, Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18, 630 (2007).
25. T. J. Webster and J. U. Ejiofor, Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 19, 4731 (2004).
26. M. J. Dalby, D. McCloy, M. Robertson, C. D. Wilkinson, and R. O. Oreffo, Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths, Biomaterials 27, 1306 (2006).
27. L. Meirelles, F. Currie, M. Jacobsson, T. Albrektsson, and A. Wennerberg, The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 23, 641 (2008).
28. T. Ruck, J. R. Porter, N. K. Allam, X. Feng, C. A. Grimes, and K. C. Popat, Nanostructured tantala as a template for enhanced osseointegration. Nanotechnology 20, 045102 (2009).
29. C. Yao, V. Perla, J. L. McKenzie, E. B. Slamovich, and T. J. Webster, Anodized Ti and Ti6Al4V possessing nanometer surface features enhances osteoblast adhesion. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 1, 68 (2005).
30. K. C. Popat, L. Leoni, C. A. Grimes, and T. A. Desai, Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 28, 3188 (2007).
31. J. H. Kim, K. P. Cho, Y. S. Chung, O. S. Kim, S. S. Chung, K. K. Lee, D. J. Lee, K. M. Lee, and Y. J. Kim, The effect of nanotubular titanium surfaces on osteoblast differentiation. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 3581 (2010).
32. J. S. Yang, M. S. Vang, S. W. Uhm, Y. S. Chung, K. K. Lee, D. J. Lee, H. J. Chung, and Y. J. Kim, Response of fetal rat calvarial cells to nanotubular titanium oxide surface. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 1807 (2011).
33. 2+ modification of titanium surfaces on early micro-bial biofilm formation. BMC Oral Health 11, 8 (2011).
34. K. Cai, J. Bossert, and K. Jandt, Does nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation?. Col. Surf. B 49, 136 (2006).
35. S. R. Chastain, A. K. Kundu, S. Dhar, J. W. Calvert, and A. J. Putnam, Adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells to polymer scaffolds occurs via distinct ECM ligands and controls their osteogenic differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 78, 73 (2006).
36. C. González-García, S. R. Sousa, D. Moratal, P. Rico, and M. Salmerón-Sánchez, Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organization. Colloids Surf. B Biointer. 77, 181 (2010).
37. M. Pérez-Garnes, C. González-García, D. Moratal, P. Rico, and M. Salmerón-Sánchez, Fibronectin distribution on demixed nanoscale topographies. Int. J. Artif. Organs 34, 54 (2011).
38. E. Gultepe, D. Nagesha, B. D. Casse, R. Banyal, T. Fitchorov, A. Karma, M. Amiji, and S. Sridhar, Sustained drug release from non-eroding nanoporous templates. Small 6, 213 (2010).
39. T. J. Webster, L. S. Schadler, R. W. Siegel, and R. Bizios, Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng. 7, 291 (2001).
40. T. J. Webster and J. U. Ejiofor, Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25, 4731 (2004).
41. J. Xiao, H. Zhou, L. Zhao, Y. Sun, S. Guan, B. Liu, and L. Kong, The effect of hierarchical micro/nanosurface titanium implant on osseointegration in ovariectomized sheep. Osteoporos Int. 22, 1907 (2011).
42. S. Rammelt, T. Illert, S. Bierbaum, D. Scharnweber, H. Zwipp, and W. Schneiders, Coating of titanium implants with collagen, RGD peptide and chondroitin sulfate. Biomaterials 27, 5561 (2006).
43. D. S. Benoit and K. S. Anseth, The effect on osteoblast function of colocalized RGD and PHSRN epitopes on PEG surfaces, Biomaterials 260, 5209 (2005).
44. S. Minagar, C. C. Berndt, J. Wang, E. Ivanova, and C. Wen, A review of the application of anodization for the fabrication of nanotubes on metal implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. (2012).
45. E. A. Vogler and R. W. Bussian, Short-term cell attachment rates: A surface-sensitive test of cell-substrate compatibility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 21, 1197 (1987).
46. P. A. Underwood and F. A. Bennett, A comparison of the biological activities of the cell-adhesive proteins vitronectin and fibronectin, J. Cell Sci. 93, 641 (1989).
47. D. J. Fabrizius-Homan and S. L. Cooper, Competitive adsorption of vitronectin with albumin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin on polymeric biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25, 953 (1991).
48. C. S. Ranucci and P. V. Moghe, Substrate microtopography can enhance cell adhesive and migratory responsiveness to matrix ligand density. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 54, 149 (2001).
49. T. P. Ugarova, C. Zamarron, Y. Veklich, R. D. Bowditch, M. H. Ginsberg, J. W. Weisel, and E. F. Plow, Conformational transitions in the cell binding domain of fibronectin. Biochemistry 34, 4457 (1995).
50. T. A. Linkhart, S. Mohan, and D. J. Baylink, Growth factors for bone growth and repair: IGF, TGF beta and BMP. Bone 19(1 Suppl), 1S (1996).
51. S. A. Harris, R. J. Enger, B. L. Riggs, and T. C. Spelsberg, Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line. J. Bone Miner. Res. 10, 178 (1995).