Using choice-based-experiments to support real estate design decisions

Journal of European Real Estate Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 63-89

  Marmolejo Duarte, Carlos ^a   Ruiz Lineros, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brownfield sites; Choice experiments; Conjoint analysis; Design; Development; Market study; Real estate; Spain

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877817621     PISSN: 17539269     EISSN: 17539277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17539261311312979     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adamowicz, W.L., Boxwall, P., Willians, M., Louviere, J. (1998), "Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation" in American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 80, pp. 64-75.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991), "The theory of planned behavior" in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
3. Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., Kilicoglu, O. (2009), "Architecture and engineering students' evaluations of house façades: preference, complexity and impressiveness" in Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 124-132.
4. Akao, Y. (1990), History of Quality Function Deployment in Japan, Hanser Publishers, Munich.
5. Aktar, E., Anagun, S., Koksal, G. (2009), "Determination of optimal product styles by ordinal logistic regression versus conjoint analysis for kitchen faucets" in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 39, pp. 866-875.
6. Álvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N. (2002), "Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms: an example from Spain" in Energy Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 107-116.
7. Alves, S., Aspinall, P., Ward Thompson, C., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., Vickers, A. (2008), "Preferences of older people for environmental attributes of local parks: the use of choice-based conjoint analysis" in Facilities, Vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 433-453.
8. Backlund, E., Stewart, W., McDonald, C. (2004), "Public evaluation of open space in Illinois: citizen support for natural area acquisition" in Environmental Management, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 634-641.
9. Bae, H. (2011), "Urban stream restoration in Korea: design considerations and residents' willingness to pay" in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 10, pp. 119-126.
10. Crozier, R. (1994), Manufactured Pleasures-Psychological Responses to Design, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
11. Currim, I.S., Weinberg, C.B., Wittink, D.R. (1981), "The design of subscription programs for a performing arts series" in Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, June, pp. 67-75.
12. De Sarbo, W.S., Kamel, J., Indrajit, S. (2001), "Customer value analysis in a heterogeneous market" in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 845-859.
13. Diaz, J. III (1998), The First Decade of Behavioral Research in the Discipline of Property, RICS Research, London.
14. Earnhart, D. (2001), "Combining revealed and stated preference methods to value the presence and quality of environmental amenities" in Land Economics, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 12-29.
15. Earnhart, D. (2002), "Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis" in Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 143-169.
16. Earnhart, D. (2006), "Using contingent pricing analysis to value open space and its duration at residential locations" in Land Economics, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 17-35.
17. Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Murray, C.B. (2011), "Designer buildings: estimating the economic value of 'signature' architecture" in Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 166-184.
18. Fusch, R., Ford, L. (1986), "Architecture and the geography on the American city" in Geography Review, Vol. 79, pp. 324-340.
19. Giaccaria, S. (2005), "Stated preferences analysis for the evaluation of environmental and cultural heritage: operating limits and perspectives", Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, dissertation PhD in Real Estate and Economic Valuations.
20. Glumac, B., Han, Q., Smeets, J., Schaefer, W. (2011), "Brownfield redevelopment features: applying Fuzzy Delphi" in Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 145-159.
21. Green, P., Rao, V. (1971), "Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data" in Journal of Marketing Research, August, pp. 355-363.
22. Green, P., Srinivasan, V. (1978), "Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook" in Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, September, pp. 103-123.
23. Green, P., Carroll, J., Goldberg, S. (1981), "A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis" in Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43, Summer, pp. 17-35.
24. Green, P., Shifflet, D., Scarbrogh, M. (1989), "Courtyard by Marriott: designing a hotel facility with consumer-based marketing models" in INTERFACES, Vol. 19, January/February, pp. 25-47.
25. Hensher, D., Rose, J., Greene, W. (2005), Applied Choice Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Herzog, T.R., Gale, T.A. (1996), "Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context" in Environment and Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 44-72.
27. Huber, J. (1997), "What we have learned from 20 years of conjoint research: when to use self-explicated, graded pairs, full profiles or choice experiments" in Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA, pp. 243-256, available at: www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
28. Huber, J., Wittink, D.R., Jonhson, R.M., Miller, R. (1992), "The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice" in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, pp. 105-114.
29. Johnson, R. (1974), "Trade-off analysis of consumer values" in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XI, May, pp. 121-127.
30. Johnson, R. (1987), "Accuracy of utility estimation in ACA", Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA, working paper.
31. Krantz, H., Tversky, A. (1971), "Conjoint measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology" in Psychology Review, Vol. 78, pp. 151-169.
32. Llinares, C., Page, A. (2007), "Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment" in Building and Environment, Vol. 42, pp. 2488-2497.
33. Llinares, C., Page, A. (2011), "Kano's model in Kansei engineering to evaluate subjective real estate consumer preferences" in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 41, pp. 233-246.
34. Louviere, J., Woodworth, G. (1983), "Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments" in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, pp. 350-367.
35. Luce, R.D., Tukey, J.W. (1964), "Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement" in Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 1-27.
36. Lussier, D.A., Olshavsky, R.W. (1979), "Task complexity and contingent processing in brand choice" in Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 6, September, pp. 154-165.
37. McFadden, D. (1974), "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior" in Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 105-142.
38. MacDonald, E., González, R., Papalambros, P. (2007), "Preference inconsistency multidisciplinary design decision making", Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2007 September 4-7, 2007, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
39. Marsh, A., Gibb, K. (2011), "Uncertainty, expectations and behavioural aspects of housing market choices" in Housing, Theory and Society, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 215-235.
40. Massiani, J., Rosato, P. (2008), "Using conjoint analysis to investigate preferences of inhabitants for the future of a greyfield area: an application to the old port in Trieste" in European Transport/Trasporti Europei, Vol. 39, pp. 59-81.
41. Matsubara, Y., Nagamachi, M. (1997), "Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support" in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 81-92.
42. Morrow-Jones, H., Irwin, H.G., Roe, B. (2004), "Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decision using discrete choice analysis" in Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 171-202.
43. Nagamachi, M. (1995), "Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development" in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 15, pp. 3-11.
44. Nasar, J.L. (1989a), "Adult viewers' preferences in residential scenes: a study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference" in Environment and Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 589-614.
45. Nasar, J.L. (1989b), "Symbolic meanings of house styles" in Environment and Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 235-257.
46. Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., Harting, T. (2011), "Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using" in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 10, pp. 95-103.
47. Norman, D.A. (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, NY.
48. Orme, B.K. (1998), "The benefits of accounting for respondent heterogeneity in choice modeling", Technical Papers.
49. Orme, B.K. (2006), Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, Research Publishers LLC, Madison, WI.
50. Orme, B.K. (2009), "Fine-tuning CBC and Adaptive CBC Questionnaires", Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA, Research Paper Series.
51. Rondán, F., Sánchez, M., Villarejo, A. (2007), "Análisis de clases latentes en la relación entre calidad de servicio, satisfacción y confianza con la intención de recompra", Universidad de Sevilla, Seville.
52. Sánchez, M., Gil, J.M. (1998), "Comparación de tres métodos de estimación del análisis conjunto: diferencias en las preferencias en el consumo de vino y en la segmentación del mercado" in Estudios de economía aplicada, Vol. 10, pp. 131-146.
53. Sanoff, H. (1991), Visual Research Methods in Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork, NY.
54. Sawtooth (2008), Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA, CBC v6.0 Technical Paper, Technical Paper Series.
55. Sayadi, S., González-Roa, M.C., Calatrava-Requena, J. (2009), "Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous mediterranean areas" in Land Use Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 334-344.
56. Sayadi, S., Roa, M., Requena, J.C. (2005), "Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in Southeastern Spain" in Ecological Economics, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 539-550.
57. Schmidt, M., Gary, M. (2002), "Combining system dynamics and conjoint analysis for strategic decision making with an automotive high-tech SME" in System Dynamics Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 359-379.
58. Stamps, A.E. (1991), "Comparing preferences of neighbors and neighborhood design review board" in Environment and Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 616-629.
59. Stamps, A.E. (1993), "Simulation effects on environmental preference" in Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 38, pp. 115-132.
60. Stamps, A.E. (1999), "Physical determinants of preferences for residential facades" in Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 723-751.
61. Stevens, T., Belkner, R., Dennis, D., Kittredge, D., Willis, C. (2000), "Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management" in Ecological Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 63-74.
62. Thurstone, L. (1927), "A law of comparative judgement" in Psychological Review, Vol. 4, pp. 273-286.
63. Varela Mallou, J., Braña Tobío, T. (1996), Análisis Conjunto aplicado a la investigación comercial, Biblioteca Eudema, ediciones pirámide.
64. García, F. (2010), "Participación ciudadana y desarrollo territorial Sostenible", Agencia Canaria de Desarrollo Sostenible y de Lucha contra el Cambio Climático, available at: www.universidadambientaldelapalma.es/seminario2008/descargas/docs/FGM.1.pdf.
65. Sánchez, M., Pérez, L. (2000), "Análisis Conjunto y Gestión Pública de Espacios Protegidos: Una Aplicación al Parque Natural de Gorbea" in Hacienda Pública Española, Vol. 153, No. 2, pp. 117-130.