Urban stream restoration in Korea: Design considerations and residents' willingness to pay

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 119-126

  Bae, Hyunhoe ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Flood stability; Natural attribute; Recreational attribute

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; FLASH FLOOD; FLOOD CONTROL; OPEN SPACE; PARK DESIGN; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STREAM; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

KOREA;

EID: 79953300903     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adamowicz W.L., Louviere J., Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental and Economics Management 1994, 32:65-84.
2. Adamowicz W.L., Boxwall P., Willians M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80:64-75.
3. Adams W.M., Perrow M.R., Carpenter A. Perceptions of river managers of institutional constrains on floodplain restoration in the UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2005, 48:877-889.
4. Asakawa S., Yoshida K., Yabe K. Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system in Sapporo. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68:176-182.
5. Baschak L.A., Brown R.D. An ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 33:211-225.
6. Bolund P., Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 1999, 29:293-301.
7. Bullock C.H. Valuing urban green space: hypothetical alternatives and the status quo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2008, 51:15-35.
8. Chow V.T. Open-channel Hydraulics 1959, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. De Waal L.C., Large C., Wade P. Rehabilitation of Rivers. Principles and Implementation. Landscape Ecology Series 1998, John Wilely & Son, Chichester.
10. Downs P.W., Skinner K.S., Kondolf C.M. Rivers and streams. Handbook of Ecological Restoration 2002, 267-296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.R. Perrow, A.J. Davy (Eds.).
11. Farber S., Griner B. Valuing watershed quality improvement using conjoint analysis. Ecological Economics 2000, 34:63-76.
12. Foster V., Mourato S. Valuing the multiple impacts of pesticide use in the UK: contingent ranking approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2000, 51:1-21.
13. Garrod G.D., Willis K.G. The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study. Ecological Economics 1997, 21:45-61.
14. Garrod G.D., Willis K.G. Using contingent ranking to estimation the loss of amenity value for inland waterways from public utility service structure. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 12:241-247.
15. Gilbert O.L. The Ecology of Urban Habitats 1989, Chapman & Hall, London.
16. Goodman, S., Seabrook, W., Daniel, H., Jaffrey, S., James, H., 1996. Determination of Non-use Values on Respect of Environmental & Other Benefits in the Costal Zone: Result of a Contingent Valuation Study of Non-use Value for Costal Resources. Research Report to the Ministry of Agricultural, Fisheries & Food, Flood and Coastal Defense Division, Center for Coastal Zone Management, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth.
17. Green P.E., Rao V.R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 1971, 8:355-363.
18. Greene W.H. LIMDEP version 7.0 User's Manual 1998, Econometrics Software.
19. Gregory K.J., Chin A. Urban stream hazards. Area 2002, 34:312-321.
20. Halvorsen, B., Strand, J., Saelensminde, K., Wenstop, F., 1996. Comparing Contingent Valuation, Conjoint Analysis and Decision Panels: An Application to the Valuation of Reduced Damage from Air Pollution in Norway. Memorandum No. 37. Department of Economics, Oslo University.
21. Harashina S., Ikeda T., Ono H. Residents' attitudes towards small rivers in an urban area: balancing the environment with flood control measures - case study in Kawasaki, Japan. Environmental Science 1989, 2:287-300.
22. Johnson R.M. Trade-off analysis of consumer values. Journal of Marketing Research 1974, 11:121-127.
23. Kim B., Lee J. Evaluation of river flood stability after river restoration. International Journal of the Field of Contents 2009, 9:417-426.
24. Korea Institute of Construction Technology, 1999. New technology for stream restoration developed by Hanrim Eco Tech., Seoul.
25. Lareau T.J., Rae D.A. Valuing WTP for diesel odor reductions: an application of contingent raking technique. Southern Economics Journal 1989, 55:728-742.
26. Luce R.D., Tukey J.W. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new scale type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1964, 1:1-27.
27. Mackenzie J. Conjoint analysis of deer hunting. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1990, 19:109-117.
28. Mackenzie J. Comparison of contingent preference model. American Journal Agricultural Economics 1993, 75:593-603.
29. McFadden D. On conditional logit model of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of Econometrics 1974, Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
30. Merrick J.R., Garcia M.W. Using value-focused thinking to improve watersheds. Journal of the American Planning Association 2004, 70:313-327.
31. Ministry of Construction and Transportation, 1998. Guideline for Plantation and Vegetation in Urban Stream Plain. Document #58170-339. Seoul.
32. Nienhuis P., Leuven R. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism?. Hydrobiologia 2001, 444:85-99.
33. Paul M.J., Meyer J.L. Streams in an urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2001, 32:333-365.
34. Petersen R.C., Petersen L.B.-M., Lacoursiere J. A building block model for stream restoration. River Conservation and Management. 1992, 293-309. Wiley, Chichester. P.J. Boon, P. Calow, G.E. Petts (Eds.).
35. Petts G., Calow P. River Restoration: Selected Extracts from the Rivers Handbook 1996, Blackwell, Oxford.
36. Rae D. The value to visitors of improving visibility at Mesa Verde and Great Smoky National Park. Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Park and Wilderness Areas, MA 1981, 217-234. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado. R.D. Rowe, L.G. Chestnut (Eds.).
37. Rhee D.S., Woo H., Kwon B.A., Ahn H.K. Hydraulic resistance of some selected vegetation in open channel flows. River Research and Applications 2008, 24:673-687.
38. Roe B., Boyle K., Teisl M. Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1996, 31:145-215.
39. Ryan M. Using Consumer Preferences in Health Care Decision Making. The Application of Conjoint Analysis 1996, Office of Health Economics, London.
40. Ryan M., Klug S. Collaborative watershed planning in Washington State: implementing the watershed planning act. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2005, 4:491-506.
41. Shin, H.S., 2007. Disaster Patterns and Characteristics and Flood Prevention Management in Korea. Unpublished Paper. Presented Paper at 2007 Korea Water Policy Forum.
42. Smith V., Desvousges W. Measuring Water Quality Benefits 1986, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston.
43. Stevens T., Belkner R., Dennis D., Kittredge D., Willis C. Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management. Ecological Economics 2000, 32:63-74.
44. Wheeler S.M. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2000, 20:133-145.
45. Woo H., Kim C., Han M. Situation and prospect of ecological engineering for stream restoration in Korea. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 2005, 9:19-27.
46. Yrjana T. Effects for in-stream fish habitat restoration within the river Iijoki Finland - goals, methods and test results. Rehabilitation of Rivers, Principles and Implementation 1998, 239-250. Wiley, Chichester. L. De Waal, A. Large, P. Wade (Eds.).
47. Yusin Cooperation, 2000. Plantation Plan and Landscape Design of Han River plain. Research Project Report No 2000-03. Korea Institutes of Construction Technology, Seoul.