Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 44-72

  Herzog, Thomas R ^a   Gale, Theresa A ^a,b  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Grand Valley State University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING AGE; NATURE CONTEXT; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC PREFERENCE; URBAN BUILDING;

USA, (MIDWEST);

EID: 0029729352     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916596281003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cicchetti, D. V. (1972). Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 405-408.
2. Day, L. L. (1992). Placemaking by design: Fitting a large new building into a historic district. Environment and Behavior, 24, 326-346.
3. Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24, 35-65.
4. Frewald, D. B. (1989). Preferences for older buildings: A psychological approach to architectural design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
5. Hershberger, R., & Cass, R. (1973). The adequacy of various media as representations of the designed environment. Man-Environment Systems, 3, 371-372.
6. Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.
7. Herzog, T. R. (1992). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 237-248.
8. Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1976). The prediction of preference for familiar urban places. Environment and Behavior, 8, 627-645.
9. Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places. Population and Environment: Behavioral and Social Issues, 5, 43-59.
10. Herzog, T. R., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20, 320-344.
11. Hetherington, J., Daniel, T. C., & Brown, T. C. (1993). Is motion more important than it sounds?: The medium of presentation in environment perception research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 283-291.
12. Hull, R. B., IV. (1992). Image congruity, place attachment, and community design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9, 181-192.
13. Hull, R. B., IV, & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21, 323-345.
14. Hull, R. B., IV, & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.
15. Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 127-162). New York: Plenum.
16. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (Eds.). (1978). Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, CA: Duxbury (Division of Wadsworth).
18. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
19. Loewen, L. J., Steel, G. D., & Suedfeld, P. (1993). Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323-331.
20. Nasar, J. L. (1981). Visual preferences of elderly public housing residents: Residential street scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 303-313.
21. Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers' preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 589-614.
22. Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. (1993). "Hot spots" of fear and crime: A multimethod investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
23. Orland, B., Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). The effect of street trees on perceived values of residential property. Environment and Behavior, 24, 298-325.
24. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Schroeder, H. W. (1989). Environment, behavior, and design research on urban forests. In E. H. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (Vol. 2, pp. 87-117). New York: Plenum.
26. Schroeder, H. W., & Cannon, W. N., Jr. (1987). Visual quality of residential streets: Both street and yard trees make a difference. Journal of Arboriculture, 13, 236-239.
27. Sheets, V. L., & Manzer, C. D. (1991). Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: Some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23, 285-304.
28. Sommer, R., Guenther, H., & Barker, P. A. (1990). Surveying householder response to street trees. Landscape Journal, 9, 79-85.
29. Sommer, R., Summit, J., & Clements, A. (1993). Slide ratings of street tree attributes: Some methodological issues and answers. Landscape Journal, 12, 17-22.
30. Stamps, A. E., III. (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 907-913.
31. Stamps, A. E., III. (1991). Public preferences for high rise buildings: Stylistic and demographic effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 839-844.
32. Stamps, A. E., III. (1994). Formal and nonformal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 3-9.
33. Trent, R., Neumann, E., & Kavashny, A. (1987). Presentation mode and question format artifacts in visual assessment research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 225-235.
34. Widmar, R. (1984). Preferences for multiple-family housing: Some implications for public participation. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1, 245-260.
35. Wike, E. L. (1971). Data analysis. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
36. Wildt, A. R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Analysis of covariance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37. Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6, 62-80.