Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1243-1263

  Bosco, Melina ^a   Marino, Edoardo M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Behavior factor; BRB; Chevron braced frame; Seismic code; Steel structure

Indexed keywords

DUCTILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STEEL CONSTRUCTION; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

BEHAVIOR FACTOR; BRB; BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES; CHEVRON BRACED FRAMES; EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT STRUCTURES; ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA; NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS; SEISMIC CODE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUCKLING; BUILDING CODE; DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; NONLINEARITY; OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 84877803103     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2269     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. CEN. Draft n. 6 of EuroCode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, 2003.
2. Della Corte G, D'Aniello M, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM. Review of steel buckling-restrained braces. Steel Construction 2011; 4(2):85-93.
3. Uang CM, Nakashima M. Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance Based Engineering. CRC Press LLC: New York, 2004.
4. Xie Q. State of the art of buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005; 61:727-748.
5. Ariyaratana C, Fahnestock LA. Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frames seismic performance considering reserve strength. Engineering Structures 2011; 33:77-89.
6. Kiggins S, Uang CM. Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system. Engineering Structures 2006; 28:1525-1532.
7. SEAONC (Structural Engineers Association of Northern California). Recommended provisions for buckling restrained braced frames. SEAONC: San Francisco, 2001.
8. th international conference STESSA 2003, Mazzolani F (ed.). A.A. Balkema Publishers: Naples, Italy, 2003; 813-818.
9. FEMA 450. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, D.C., USA, 2004.
10. AISC 2005. Seismic Provision for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, 2005.
11. Asgarian B, Shokrgozar HR. BRBF response modification factor. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2009; 65:290-298.
12. Mahmoudi M, Zaree M. Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2010; 66:1196-1204.
13. Kim J, Park J, Kim S. Seismic behavior factors of buckling restrained braced frames. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2009; 33(3):261-284.
14. Sabelli R, Mahin SA, Chang C. Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures 2003; 25:655-666.
15. Fahnestock LA, Sauce R, Ricles JM. Seismic response and performance of buckling restrained braced frame. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007; 133(9):1195-1204.
16. Fahnestock LA, Sauce R, Ricles JM. Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007; 133(9):1205-1214.
17. Castaldo C, Della Corte G, Mazzolani FM. Towards the behavior factor of steel frames with BRB braces. Proceedings of the XXII CTA, 2009; 185-194, (in Italian).
18. Marino EM, Ghersi A, Nakashima M. Behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces. Proceedings of the XXI CTA, 2007; 185-192.
19. Black CJ, Makris N, Aiken ID. Component Testing, Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling Restrained 'Unbonded' Braces. Technical Report PEER 2002/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
20. Fahnestock LA, Sauce R, Ricles JM, Lu LW. Ductility demands on buckling-restrained braced frames under earthquake loading. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2003; 2(2):255-268.
21. th international conference STESSA 2003, Mazzolani F (ed.). A.A. Balkema Publishers: Naples, Italy, 2003; 37-43.
22. rd international conference STESSA 2000, Mazzolani F, Tremblay R (eds). Taylor & Francis: Montreal, Canada, 2000; 33-38.
23. Iwata M, Murai M. Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:1807-1826.
24. Merritt S, Uang CM, Benzoni G. Subassemblage Testing of CoreBrace Buckling Restrained Braces. Structural Systems Research Project, Report No. TR-2003/01, University of California, San Diego, 2003.
25. Merritt S, Uang CM, Benzoni G. Subassemblage Testing of Star Seismic Buckling Restrained Braces. Structural Systems Research Project, Report No. TR-2003/04, University of California, San Diego, 2003.
26. Newell J, Uang CM, Benzoni G. Subassemblage testing of corebrace buckling restrained braces (G series). Structural Systems Research Project, Report No. TR-2006/01, University of California, San Diego, 2006.
27. th international conference STESSA 2003, Mazzolani F (ed.). A.A. Balkema Publishers: Naples, Italy, 2003; 211-216.
28. Zhao J, Wu B, Ou J. A novel type of angle steel buckling-restrained brace: Cyclic behavior and failure mechanism. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; 40:1083-1102.
29. Takeuchi T, Ida M, Yamada S, Suzuki K. Estimation of cumulative deformation capacity of buckling restrained braces. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2008; 134(5):822-831.
30. Andrews BM, Fahnestock LA, Song J. Ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2009; 65:1712-1720.
31. Tsai KC, Hsiao PC. Pseudo-dynamic test of a full-scale CFT/BRB frame Part II: Seismic performance of buckling-restrained braces and connections. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37:1099-1115.
32. CEN. EuroCode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, ENV 1993-1-1. European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, 2005.
33. Mazzoni S, McKenna F Scott, MH, Fenves GL, et al. OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: Berkeley, 2007.
34. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Punyamurthula S, Sun JI. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/Sac steel project. SAC Background Document. Report No. SAC/BD-99-03, SAC Joint Venture, 555 University Ave., Sacramento, 1997.
35. MacRae GA, Kimura Y, Roeder C. Effect of Column stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behaviour. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(3):381-391.
36. Tremblay R. Achieving a stable inelastic seismic response for multi-story concentrically braced steel frames. Engineering Journal AISC 2003; 40:111-129.
37. CEN. EuroCode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, 2005.
38. Marino EM, Nakashima M. Seismic performance and new design procedure for chevron-braced frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:433-452.
39. Bosco M, Rossi PP. Seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures 2009; 31:664-674.
40. Rossi PP, Lombardo A. Influence of the link overstrength factor on the seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2007; 63(11):1529-1545.