Ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

Volumn 65, Issue 8-9, 2009, Pages 1712-1720

  Andrews, Blake M ^a,b   Fahnestock, Larry A ^a   Song, Junho ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Buckling restrained braces; Ductility capacity; Maximum likelihood estimation method; Post earthquake assessment; Remaining capacity

Indexed keywords

BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES; DUCTILITY CAPACITY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION METHOD; POST-EARTHQUAKE ASSESSMENT; REMAINING CAPACITY;

BLOCK CODES; BUCKLING; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; STEEL BRIDGES;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 67349260726     PISSN: 0143974X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Xie Q. State of the art buckling-restrained braces in Asia. J Constr Steel Res 61 (2005) 727-748
2. Uang C.M., and Nakashima M. Steel buckling-restrained braced frames. Earthquake eng: Recent advances and applications (2003), CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL) [chapter 16]
3. Fahnestock L.A., Sause R., and Ricles J.M. Seismic response and performance of buckling-restrained braced frames. J Struct Eng 133 9 (2007) 1195-1204
4. Carden L.P., Itani A.M., and Buckle I.G. Cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained braces for ductile end cross frame. Eng J 43 2 (2006) 127-139
5. Fahnestock L.A., Ricles J.M., and Sause R. Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame. J Struct Eng 133 9 (2007) 1205-1214
6. Takeuchi T., Ida M., Yamada S., and Suzuki K. Estimation of cumulative deformation capacity of buckling restrained braces. J Struct Eng 134 5 (2008) 822-831
7. Benavent-Climent A. An energy-based damage model for seismic response of steel structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36 8 (2007) 1049-1064
8. Gardoni P., Der Kiureghian A., and Mosalam K.M. Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. JEM 128 10 (2002) 1024-1038
9. Song J, Kang W-H, Kim KS, Jung S. Probabilistic shear strength models for reinforced concrete beams by Bayesian updating based on experimental observations. In: The 5th computational stochastic mechanics conference. 2006. p. 21-3
10. Andrews BM, Fahnestock LA, Song J. Performance-based engineering framework and ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces. In: Newmark structural engineering report series. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2008. No 12 http://hdl.handle.net/2142/8809
11. ASTM 1049-85. Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis. 2005
12. Devore J.L. Probability and Statistics. Fifth ed. (2000), Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (CA) p. 267-73
13. Park Y.-J., and Ang A.H.-S. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete. J Struct Eng, ASCE 111 4 (1985) 722-739
14. American society of civil engineers. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 07-05; 2005. p. 109-18
15. Tremblay R., Bolduc P., Neville R., and DeVall R. Seismic testing and performance of buckling-restrained bracing systems. Can J Civil Eng 33 2 (2006) 183-198