Collectives' duties and collectivization duties

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 231-248

  Collins, Stephanie ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

collective responsibility; collectivization; group agency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877758403     PISSN: 00048402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2012.717533     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arrow, Kenneth 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn, New York: Wiley.
2. Bratman, Michael 1992. Shared Cooperative Activity, The Philosophical Review 101/2: 327-41.
3. Brennan, Geoffrey and Nicholas Southwood 2007. Feasibility in Action and Attitude, in Hommage à Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, ed. Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, Bjorn Petersson, Jonas Josefsson, and Dan Egonsson, URL1/45http://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/ Brennan&Southwood.pdf4.
4. Cullity, Garrett 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Feinberg, Joel 1968. Collective Responsibility, Journal of Philosophy 65/21: 674-88.
6. French, Peter 1979. The Corporation as a Moral Person, American Philosophical Quarterly 16/3: 207-15.
7. French, Peter 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility, New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Gilbert, Margaret 2001. Collective Preferences, Obligations and Rational Choice, Economics and Philosophy 17/1: 109-19.
9. Gilbert, Margaret 2006. Who's to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and Its Implications for Group Members, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30/1: 94-114.
10. Goldman, Holly S. 1978. Doing the Best One Can, in Values and Morals, ed. Alvin Goldman and Jaegwon Kim, Boston: Reidel.
11. Graham, Peter A. 2011. Ought and Ability, The Philosophical Review 120/3: 337-82.
12. Held, Virginia 1970. Can a Random Collective Be Morally Responsible? Journal of Philosophy 67/14: 471-81.
13. Jensen, Mark 2009. The Limits of Practical Possibility, The Journal of Political Philosophy 17/2: 168-84.
14. Kutz, Christopher 2000. Acting Together. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61/1: 1-31.
15. Lawford-Smith, Holly 2012. The Feasibility of Collectives' Actions, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90/3.
16. List, Christian and Philip Pettit 2011. Group Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ludwig, Kurt 2007. Collective Intentional Behavior from the Standpoint of Semantics, Nous 41/3: 355-93.
18. May, Larry 1992. Sharing Responsibility, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. May, Larry and Robert Strikwerda 1994. Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape, Hypatia 9/2: 134-51.
20. Mellema, Gregory 2006. Collective Responsibility and Qualifying Actions, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30/1: 168-75.
21. Miller, David 2004. Holding Nations Responsible, Ethics 114/2: 240-68.
22. Pettit, Philip 2007. Responsibility Incorporated, Ethics 117/2: 141-201.
23. Pettit, Philip 2010. Groups with Minds of Their Own, in Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, ed. Alvin I. Goldman and Dennis Whitcomb, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Pettit, Philip and David Schweikard 2006. Joint Actions and Group Agents, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 18-39.
25. Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 1984. 'Ought' Conversationally Implies 'Can', The Philosophical Review 93/2: 249-61.
26. Smith, Holly 2010. Subjective Rightness, Social Philosophy and Policy 27/2 64-110.
27. Sugden, Robert 2000. Team Preferences, Economics and Philosophy 16/2: 175-204.
28. Tuomela, Raimo 2006. Joint Intention, We-Mode and I-Mode, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30/1: 35-58.
29. Vranas P. B. M 2007. I Ought, Therefore I Can, Philosophical Studies 136/2 167-216.
30. Wendt, Alexander 2004. The State as Person in International Theory, Review of International Studies 30/2: 289-316.