Optimal patch application time in the evaluation of skin irritation

Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 363-369

  Kanto, Hiromi ^a   Washizaki, Kumiko ^a   Ito, Masatoshi ^a   Matsunaga, Kayoko ^b   Akamatsu, Hirohiko ^b   Kawai, Keiichi ^c   Katoh, Norito ^d   Natsuaki, Masaru ^e   Yoshimura, Isao ^f   Kojima, Hajime ^g   Okamoto, Yuko ^h   Okuda, Minehiro ⁱ   Kuwahara, Hirofumi ^j   Sugiyama, Mariko ^k   Kinoshita, Shigemi ^l   Mori, Fukuyoshi ^l  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c Keiichi Kawai Skin Clinic   (Japan)

^d KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^f TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^g NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Japan)

^h Cutaneous Research Section   (Japan)

ⁱ KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

^j Kanebo Cosmetics   (Japan)

^k SHISEIDO RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^l POLA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES INC   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

24 h patch test; Japanese standard for evaluating of skin irritation; new standard for evaluating of skin irritation; optimum application time; skin irritation response; sugai scoring

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; COSMETIC; DOMESTIC CHEMICAL; IRRITANT AGENT; OIL; SURFACTANT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; SKIN IRRITATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877740482     PISSN: 03852407     EISSN: 13468138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.12004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Magnusson B, Hersle K,. Patch test. methodsII. Regional variations of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol 1965; 45: 257-261.
2. Kawamura T, Shoji S, Masuda T, et al,. Basic studies on the standardization of patch test. Jpn J Dermatol 1970; 80: 301-314 (Japanese).
3. Berardesca E, Maibach HI,. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulfate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Derm 1988; 18: 65-70.
4. Reich L, Willis C, Wilkinson J, Shaw S, De Lacharrière O,. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate(SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48h and 96h in 152 subjects. Contact Derm 1998; 39: 240-243.
5. Löffler H, Pirker C, Aramaki J, Frosch PJ, Happle R, Effendy I,. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate. Eur J Dermatol 2001; 11 (5): 416-419.
6. Hinnen U, Elsner P, Burg G,. Assessment of skin irritancy by 2short tests compared to acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Derm 1995; 33: 236-239.
7. Basketter D, Gilpin G, Kuhn M, Lawrence D, Reynolds F, Whittle E,. Patch tests versus use tests in skin irritation risk assessment. Contact Derm 1998; 39: 252-256.
8. Löffler H, Happle R,. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, Sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside. Contact Derm 2003; 48: 26-32.
9. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Willson D,. Irritant reactivity in males and females. Contact Derm 1987; 17: 276-280.
10. Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D,. Evaluation of modifications of traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygienic products. Skin Res Technol 2004; 10: 73-84.
11. Griffiths HA, Wilhelm K-P, Robinson MK, et al,. Interlaboratory evaluation of a human patch test for the identification of skin irritation potential/hazard. Food Chem Toxicol 1997; 35: 255-260.
12. Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Griffiths HA, Rowson M, Whittle E, York M,. The Classification of Skin Irritation by Human Patch Test. Food Chem Toxicol 1997; 35: 845-852.
13. Robinson MK, McFadden JP, Basketter DA,. Validity and ethics of the human 4- patch test as an alternative method to assess acute skin irritation potential. Contact Derm 2001; 45: 1-12.
14. Basketter DA, York M, McFadden JP, Robinson MK,. Determination of skin irritation potential in the hunman 4-patch test. Contact Derm 2004; 51: 1-4.
15. Kawai K,. Proposal of a new standard for skin irritation reaction in patch testing. Visual Dermatology 2004; 3: 74-81 (Japanese).
16. Ohshima H, Takiwaki H, Washizaki K, Ishiko A, Itoh M, Kanto H,. Quantitative evaluation of patch test reactions: a comparison between visual grading and erythema index image analysis. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17: 220-225.
17. Sugai T,. Contact dermatitis and patch test. Skin Research 1977; 19: 210-222.
18. Held E, Agner T,. Comparison between 2test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin. Contact Derm 1999; 40: 261-268.
19. Schnetz E, Diepgen TL, Elsner P, et al,. Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulation on irritant. Contact Derm 2000; 42: 336-343.
20. Sugai T, Takagi T,. The patch test of nylon cloth and the natural fiber cloth. Hifu 1976; 18: 38-43.