Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: Sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 26-32

  Loffler H ^a   Happle, R ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Irritant contact dermatitis; Laser Doppler flowmetry; Patch test; Skin recovery; Transepidermal water loss

Indexed keywords

ALKYL GROUP; DETERGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; GLUCOSIDE; IRRITANT AGENT; SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINETICS; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATCH TEST; REGENERATION; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN WATER LOSS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DETERGENTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; GLUCOSIDES; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; WATER LOSS, INSENSIBLE;

EID: 0037250892     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.480105.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aramaki J, Effendy I, Happle R, Kawana S, Löffler C, Löffler H. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 286-290.
2. Aramaki J, Löffler C, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Löffler H. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 704-708.
3. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritant patch testing: a dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990: 95: 543-547.
4. Effendy I, Maibach H I. Surfactants and experimental irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 217-225.
5. Lee Ch, Maibach H I. The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 1-7.
6. Tupker R A, Willis C, Berardesca E, et al. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure testing. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 53-69.
7. Friebe K, Effendy I. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate. Br J Dermatol 2003: in press.
8. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement: a report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
9. Dihoom M, Mahmoud G S, Sudani Oh. An outbreak of hand dermatitis among workers using sodium lauryl sulfate for skin cleansing. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 366-367.
10. Patil S, Singh P, Sarasour K, Maibach H. Quantification of sodium lauryl sulfate penetration into the skin and underlying tissue after topical application. Pharmacological and toxicological implications. J Pharm Sci 1995: 84: 1240-1244.
11. Agner T, Fullerton A, Broby-Johansen U, Batsberg W, Irritant patch testing: Penetration of sodium lauryl sulphate into human skin. Skin Pharmacol 1990: 3: 213-217.
12. Fullerton A, Broby-Johannsen U, Agner T. Sodium lauryl sulphate penetration in an in vitro model using human skin. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 222-225.
13. Loden M. The simultaneous penetration of water and sodium lauryl sulfate through isolated human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1990: 41: 227-233.
14. van der Valk P G, Nater J P, Bleumink E. Skin irritancy of surfactants as assessed by water vapor loss measurements. J Invest Dermatol 1984: 82: 291-293.
15. Agner T, Serup J. Time course of occlusive effects on skin evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL): including patch tests with sodium lauryl sulphate and water. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 6-9.
16. Weßbecher R, Straube M, Szliska C, Schwanitz H J. Anamneseauxilium und gewebedermatologische Beurteilung bei medizinischen Bademeistern, Masseuren und Physiotherapeuten. Hautarzt 1998: 49: 912-919.
17. Tsai T F, Maibach H I. How irritant is water? An overview. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 311-314.
18. Wilhelm K P, Freitag G, Wolff Hh. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994: 30: 944-949.
19. Lee J Y, Effendy I, Maibach H I. Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 285-290.
20. Rhein L D. Review of properties of surfactants that determine their interactions with stratum corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1997: 48: 253-274.
21. Barany E, Lindberg M, Loden M. Biophysical characterization of skin damage and recovery after exposure to different surfactants. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 98-103.
22. Rhein L D, Simion F A, Hill R L, Cagan Rh, Mattai J, Maibach H I. Human cutaneous response to a mixed surfactant system: role of solution phenomena in controlling surfactant irritation. Dermatologica 1990: 180: 18-23.
23. Foulds I. Occupational aspects of eczema. In: Marks, R, ed. Eczema. London: Martin Dunitz, 1992: 202-206.
24. Löffler H, Effendy I. Prevention of irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2002: 12: 4-9.
25. Schwanitz H J, Uter W. Interdigital dermatitis: sentinel skin damage in hairdressers. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142: 1011-1012.
26. Löffler H, Effendy I, Happle R. Epikutane Testung mit Natriumlaurylsulfat: Nutzen und Grenzen in Forschung und Praxis. Hautarzt 1999: 50: 769-778.