Effect of coronary calcification on diagnostic accuracy of the 64row computed tomography coronary angiography;Áhrif kalks í kransædum á greiningargildi TS-kransædarannsóknar

Laeknabladid

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 241-246

  Gudmundsdóttir, Valdís Klara ^a   Andersen, Karl ^a,b   Gudjónsdóttir, Jónína ^b,c  

^a LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Iceland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^c Domus Medica ^*  (Iceland)

Author keywords

Agatston score; Computed Tomography; Conventional coronary angiography; Coronary arteries; Coronary artery calcium

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL CALCIFICATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; ICELAND; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ICELAND; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877699854     PISSN: 00237213     EISSN: 16704959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jones CM, Athanasiou T, Dunne N, Kirby J, Attaran S, Chow A, et al. Multi-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 443-50.
2. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2010 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009 Dec 17.
3. Aspelund T, Gudnason V, Magnusdottir BT, Andersen K, Sigurdsson G, Thorsson B, et al. Analysing the large decline in coronary heart disease mortality in the Icelandic population aged 25-74 between the years 1981 and 2006. PLoS One 2010; 5: e13957.
4. Bourassa MG. The history of cardiac catheterization. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21: 1011-4.
5. Mueller RL, Sanborn TA. The history of interventional cardiology: cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and related interventions. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 146-72.
6. Arbab-Zadeh A, Texter J, Ostbye KM, Kitagawa K, Brinker J, George RT, et al. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard. Heart 2010; 96: 1358-63.
7. Delgado K, Williams M. Diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease of multislice CT scanners in comparison to conventional coronary angiography: an integrative literature review. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2010; 22: 496-503.
8. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 2135-44.
9. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Wang J, Lu Y, Zhang ZL, Jiang SS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 727-40.
10. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Jr., Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 827-32.
11. Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, Choi D, Yoo KJ, Kim MI, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 2004; 24: 787- 800.
12. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 134-41.
13. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-7.
14. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Chan WL, Seyfarth MT, Liew HB, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 1323 e1-6.
15. Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3: 190-204.
16. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ, Kondos G. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 243-52.
17. Hecht HS, Bhatti T. How much calcium is too much calcium for coronary computerized tomographic angiography? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008; 2: 183-7.
18. Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Geleijns J. Artifacts in ECGsynchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 581-91.
19. Kopp AF, Kuttner A, Trabold T, Heuschmid M, Schroder S, Claussen CD. Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 2004; 77 Spec No 1 :S87-97.
20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
21. Hsieh J. Computed tomography: Principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2 ed. Wiley Interscience and SPIE; 2009.
22. Valgeirsdottir IR, Haraldsdottir S, Scheving SS, Gudjonsdottir J, Sigurdsson AF, Gudnason T, et al. Greiningarhafni 64 sneida tolvusneidmyndatakni til samanburdar vid hefdbundna kransadatradingu. Laknabladid 2008; 94: 199-205.
23. Jonsdottir B, Danielsen R. Samanburdur a mati kransadatrengsla med tolvusneidmyndatakni og hjartatradingu. Laknabladid 2006; 92: 27-32.
24. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007; 244: 112-20.
25. Baumuller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Seifert B, et al. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology 2009; 253: 56-64.
26. Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 379-87.
27. Yoon YE, Chang SA, Choi SI, Chun EJ, Cho YS, Youn TJ, et al. The absence of coronary artery calcification does not rule out the presence of significant coronary artery disease in Asian patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: 389-98.
28. Iwasaki K, Matsumoto T, Aono H, Furukawa H, Samukawa M. Prevalence of non-calcified coronary plaque on 64-slice computed tomography in asymptomatic patients with zero and low coronary artery calcium. Can J Cardiol 2010; 26: 377-80.
29. Bielak LF, Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, 2nd, Schwartz RS, Peyser PA. Probabilistic model for prediction of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease using electron beam computed tomography calcium score strata. Circulation 2000; 102: 380-5.