Systems-based approaches toward wound healing

Pediatric Research

Volumn 73, Issue 4-2, 2013, Pages 553-563

  Buganza Tepole, Adrian ^a   Kuhl, Ellen ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR; COLLAGEN; FIBRIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ANGIOGENESIS; BIOMECHANICS; COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WOUND HEALING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; FIBROBLAST; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; LEUKOCYTE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METABOLISM; PEDIATRICS; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMOTAXIS; COLLAGEN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBRIN; FIBROBLASTS; HEMOSTASIS; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTES; PEDIATRICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84877357654     PISSN: 00313998     EISSN: 15300447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.3     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fbrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci 2004;9:283-9.
2. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008;453:314-21.
3. Colwell AS, Longaker MT, Lorenz H P. Fetal wound healing. Front Biosci 2003;8:s1240-8.
4. Mutsaers SE, Bishop JE, McGrouther G, Laurent GJ. Mechanisms of tissue re pair: from wound healing to fbrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1997;29:5-17.
5. Verhaegen PD, van Zuijlen P P, Pennings NM, et al. Diferences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: an objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:649-56.
6. Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life afer skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aes-thet Surg 2008;61:1049-58.
7. Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson M W. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003; 326:88-92.
8. Gurtner GC, Dauskardt RH, Wong V W, et al. Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies. Ann Surg 2011;254:217-25.
9. Christley S, Lee B, Dai X, Nie Q. Integrative multicellular biological modeling: a case study of 3D epidermal development using GPU algorithms. BMC Syst Biol 2010;4:107.
10. Vodovotz Y, Csete M, Bartels J, Chang S, An G. Translational systems biology of infammation. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000014.
11. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature 2002;420:206-10.
12. Vodovotz Y. Translational systems biology of infammation and healing. Wound Repair Regen 2010;18:3-7.
13. Martin P. Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997;276:75-81.
14. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 2009;37: 1528-42.
15. Olutoye OO, Zhu X, Cass DL, Smith C W. Neutrophil recruitment by fetal porcine endothelial cells: implications in scarless fetal wound healing. Pediatr Res 2005;58:1290-4.
16. Hunter PJ, Borg TK. Integration from proteins to organs: the Physiome Project. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:237-43.
17. Qutub AA, Mac Gabhann F, Karagiannis ED, Vempati P, Popel AS. Multiscale models of angiogenesis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2009;28: 14-31.
18. Southern J, Pitt-Francis J, Whiteley J, et al. Multi-scale computational modelling in biology and physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008;96:60-89.
19. Painter KJ. Continuous models for cell migration in tissues and applications to cell sorting via diferential chemotaxis. Bull Math Biol 2009;71:1117-47.
20. Postlethwaite AE, Keski-Oja J, Moses HL, Kang AH. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fbroblasts by transforming growth factor beta. J Exp Med 1987;165:251-6.
21. Tranquillo RT, Laufenburger DA. Stochastic model of leuko cyte chemosen-sory movement. J Math Biol 1987;25:229-62.
22. Steenfos HH. Growth factors and wound healing. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1994;28:95-105.
23. Insall RH. Understanding eukaryotic chemotaxis: a pseudopod-centred view. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:453-8.
24. Wadhams GH, Armitage J P. Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:1024-37.
25. Stokes CL, Laufenburger DA. Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothe-lial cell random motility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis. J Teor Biol 1991;152:377-403.
26. Wong V W, Levi K, Akaishi S, Schultz G, Dauskardt RH. Scar zones: region-specifc diferences in skin tension may determine incisional scar formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1272-6.
27. Ogawa R. Keloid and hypertrophic scarring may result from a mecha-noreceptor or mechanosensitive nociceptor disorder. Med Hypotheses 2008;71:493-500.
28. Wong V W, Akaishi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Pushing back: wound mechanotransduction in repair and regeneration. J Invest Dermatol 2011;131:2186-96.
29. Chiquet M, Gelman L, Lutz R, Maier S. From mechanotransduction to extracellular matrix gene expression in fbroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793:911-20.
30. Paterno J, Vial IN, Wong V W, et al. Akt-mediated mechanotransduction in murine fbroblasts during hypertrophic scar formation. Wound Repair Regen 2011;19:49-58.
31. Wong VW, Rustad KC, Akaishi S, et al. Focal adhesion kinase links mechanical force to skin fbrosis via infammatory signaling. Nat Med 2012;18:148-52.
32. Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, et al. Mechanical load initiates hypertro-phic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J 2007;21:3250-61.
33. Simpson CL, Patel DM, Green KJ. Deconstructing the skin: cytoarchitec-tural determinants of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011;12:565-80.
34. Levine HA, Sleeman BD, Nilsen-Hamilton M. Mathematical modeling of the onset of capillary formation initiating angiogenesis. J Math Biol 2001;42:195-238.
35. Herbert S P, Stainier DY. Molecular control of endothelial cell behaviour during blood vessel morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011;12:551-64.
36. Tong P, Fung YC. The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J Biomech 1976;9:649-57.
37. Lanir Y. Constitutive equations for fbrous connective tissues. J Biomech 1983;16:1-12.
38. Flynn C, Taberner A, Nielsen P. Mechanical characterisation of in vivohuman skin using a 3D force-sensitive micro-robot and fnite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2011;10:27-38.
39. Maini PK, McElwain DL, Leavesley DI. Traveling wave model to interpret a wound-healing cell migration assay for human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Tissue Eng 2004;10:475-82.
40. Chaplain MA. Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis. J Neurooncol 2000;50:37-51.
41. Pettet GJ, Byrne HM, McElwain DL, Norbury J. A model of wound-healing angiogenesis in sof tissue. Math Biosci 1996;136:35-63.
42. Sherratt JA, Murray JD. Models of epidermal wound healing. Proc Biol Sci 1990;241:29-36.
43. Cobbold CA, Sherratt JA. Mathematical modelling of nitric oxide activity in wound healing can explain keloid and hypertrophic scarring. J Teor Biol 2000;204:257-88.
44. Sherratt JA, Murray JD. Mathematical analysis of a basic model for epidermal wound healing. J Math Biol 1991;29:389-404.
45. Haugh JM. Deterministic model of dermal wound invasion incorporating receptor-mediated signal transduction and spatial gradient sensing. Bio-phys J 2006;90:2297-308.
46. Javierre E, Vermolen FJ, Vuik C, van der Zwaag S. A mathematical analysis of physiological and morphological aspects of wound closure. J Math Biol 2009;59:605-30.
47. Cai AQ, Landman KA, Hughes BD. Multi-scale modeling of a wound-healing cell migration assay. J Teor Biol 2007;245:576-94.
48. Callaghan T, Khain E, Sander L. A stochastic model for wound healing. J Stat Phys 2006;122:909-24.
49. Sun T, Adra S, Smallwood R, Holcombe M, MacNeil S. Exploring hypotheses of the actions of TGF-beta1 in epidermal wound he aling using a 3D computational multiscale model of the human epidermis. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e8515.
50. Peirce SM. Computational and mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. Microcirculation 2008;15:739-51.
51. Xue C, Friedman A, Sen CK. A mathematical model of ischemic cutaneous wounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:16782-7.
52. Gafney EA, Pugh K, Maini PK, Arnold F. Investigating a simple model of cutaneous wound healing angiogenesis. J Math Biol 2002;45:337-74.
53. Anderson A. A mathematical model for capillary network formation in the absence of endothelial cell proliferation. Appl Math Lett 1998;11:109-14.
54. Byrne HM, Chaplain MAJ, Evans DL, Hopkinson I. Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis in wound healing: Comparison of theory and experiment. J Teor Med 2000;2:175-97.
55. Peirce SM, Van Gieson EJ, Skalak TC. Multicellular simulation predicts microvascular patterning and in silicotissue assembly. FASEB J 2004;18:731-3.
56. Sleeman BD, Levine HA. Partial diferential equations of chemotaxis and angiogenesis. Math Meth Appl Sci 2001;24:405-26.
57. Milde F, Bergdorf M, Koumoutsakos P. A hybrid model for three-dimensional simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. Biophys J 2008;95:3146-60.
58. Knighton DR, Hunt TK, Scheuenstuhl H, Halliday BJ, Werb Z, Banda MJ. Oxygen tension regulates the expression of angiogenesis factor by mac-rophages. Science 1983;221:1283-5.
59. Maggelakis SA. A mathematical model of tissue replacement during epidermal wound healing. Appl Math Model 2003;27:189-96.
60. Owen MR, Byrne HM, Lewis CE. Mathematical modelling of the use of macrophages as vehicles for drug delivery to hypoxic tumour sites. J Teor Biol 2004;226:377-91.
61. Sen CK. Wound healing essentials: let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:1-18.
62. Gordillo GM, Sen CK. Revisiting the essential role of oxygen in wound healing. Am J Surg 2003;186:259-63.
63. Tibbles PM, Edelsberg JS. Hyperbaric-oxygen therapy. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1642-8.
64. Croll TI, Gentz S, Mueller K, et al. Modelling oxygen difusion and cell growth in a porous, vascularising scafold for sof tissue engineering applications. Chem Eng Sci 2005;60:4924-34.
65. Schugart RC, Friedman A, Zhao R, Sen CK. Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:2628-33.
66. Olsen L, Sherratt JA, Maini PK. A mathematical model for fbro-proliferative wound healing disorders. Bull Math Biol 1996;58:787-808.
67. Olsen L, Sherratt JA, Maini PK. A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound contraction and the permanence of the contracted tissue displacement profle. J Teor Biol 1995;177:113-28.
68. Dallon JC, Sherratt JA, Maini PK. Modeling the efects of transforming growth factor-beta on extracellular matrix alignment in dermal wound repair. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:278-86.
69. Tranquillo RT, Murray JD. Continuum model of fbroblast-driven wound contraction: infammation-mediation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2007;158:361-71.
70. McDougall S, Dallon J, Sherratt J, Maini P. Fibroblast migration and collagen deposition during dermal wound healing: mathematical modelling and clinical implications. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006;364:1385-405.
71. Vermolen FJ, Javierre E. Computer simulations from a fnite-element model for wound contraction and closure. J Tissue Viability 2010;19:43-53.
72. Yagmur C, Akaishi S, Ogawa R, Guneren E. Mechanical receptor-related mechanisms in scar management: a review and hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:426-34.
73. Prajapati RT, Eastwood M, Brown RA. Duration and orientation of mechanical loads determine fbroblast cyto-mechanical activation: monitored by protease release. Wound Repair Regen 2000;8:238-46.
74. Prajapati RT, Chavally-Mis B, Herbage D, Eastwood M, Brown RA. Mechanical loading regulates protease production by fbroblasts in three-dimensional collagen substrates. Wound Repair Regen 2000;8: 226-37.
75. Murphy KE, McCue S W, McElwain DL. Clinical strategies for the alleviation of contractures from a predictive mathematical model of dermal repair. Wound Repair Regen 2012;20:194-202.
76. Cumming BD, McElwain DL, Upton Z. A mathematical model of wound healing and subsequent scarring. J R Soc Interface 2010;7: 19-34.
77. Mi Q, Rivière B, Clermont G, Steed DL, Vodovotz Y. Agent-based model of infammation and wound healing: insights into diabetic foot ulcer pathology and the role of transforming growth factor-beta1. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15:671-82.
78. Ambrosi D, Ateshian GA, Arruda EM, et al. Perspectives on biological growth and remodeling. J Mech Phys Solids 2011;59:863-83.
79. Menzel A, Kuhl E. Frontiers in growth and remodeling. Mech Res Com-mun 2012;42:1-14.
80. Socci L, Pennati G, Gervaso F, Vena P. An axisymmetric computational model of skin expansion and growth. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2007;6: 177-88.
81. Buganza Tepole A, Gosain A, Kuhl E. Stretching skin: the physiological limit and beyond. Int J Non-Linear Mech 2012;47: 938-49.
82. Buganza Tepole A, Ploch CJ, Wong J, Gosain AK, Kuhl E. Growing skin: a computational model for skin expansion in reconstructive surgery. J Mech Phys Solids 2011;59:2177-90.
83. Zöllner AM, Buganza Tepole A, Gosain AK, Kuhl E. Growing skin: tissue expansion in pediatric forehead reconstruction. Biomech Model Mecha-nobiol 2012;11:855-67.
84. Zöllner AM, Buganza Tepole A, Kuhl E. On the biomechanics and mecha-nobiology of growing skin. J Teor Biol 2012;297:166-75.