A tribological assessment of a PEEK based self-mating total cervical disc replacement

Wear

Volumn 303, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 473-479

  Xin, H ^a   Shepherd, D E T ^a   Dearn, K D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical total disc replacement; Friction; Lubrication; Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK); Spine simulator; Wear

Indexed keywords

CERVICAL DISCS; FRICTION TEST; LUBRICATION REGIMES; MIXED LUBRICATION; POLY-ETHER-ETHER-KETONE (PEEK); TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENTS; TRIBOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS; WEAR-TESTING;

FRICTION; KETONES; LUBRICATION; TRIBOLOGY; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

ETHERS;

EID: 84877328168     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.03.052     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Guerin H.A., Elliott D.M. Structure and properties of soft tissues in the spine. Spine Technology Handbook 2006, 35-62. Academic Press, Burlington. S.M. Kurtz, A.A. Edidin (Eds.).
2. Hilibrand A.S., Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine Journal 2004, 4:S190-S194.
3. Zechmeister I., Winkler R., Mad P. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. European Spine Journal 2011, 20:177-184.
4. Delamarter R.B., Murrey D., Janssen M.E., Goldstein J.A., Zigler J., Tay B.K.B., Darden B. Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter Investigational Device Exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients. SAS Journal 2010, 4:122-128.
5. Robertson J.T., Papadopoulos S.M., Traynelis V.C. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine 2005, 3:417-423.
6. Auerbach J.D., Jones K.J., Fras C.I., Balderston J.R., Rushton S.A., Chin K.R. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine Journal 2008, 8:711-716.
7. Kurtz S.M. Total disc arthroplasty. Spine Technology Handbook 2006, 303-370. Academic Press, Burlington. S.M. Kurtz, A.A. Edidin (Eds.).
8. Darden B.V. ProDisc-C cervical disk arthroplasty. Seminars in Spine Surgery 2012, 24:8-13.
9. Pimenta L., McAfee P.C. A. Cappuccino, F.P. Bellera, H.D. Link, Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine Journal 2004, 4:S315-S321.
10. Traynelis V.C. The Prestige cervical disc replacement. Spine Journal 2004, 4:310S-314S.
11. Wenger M., van Hoonacker P., Zachee B., Lange R., Markwalder T.M. Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2009, 16:220-225.
12. Hallab N. Intervertebral disc joint replacement technology. Joint Replacement Technology 2008, 515-544. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. A.P. Revell (Ed.).
13. Zeh A., Planert M., Siegert G., Lattke P., Held A., Hein W. Release of cobalt and chromium ions into the serum following implantation of the metal-on-metal Maverick-type artificial lumbar disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Spine 2007, 32:348-352.
14. Brown S.A. Synthetic biomaterials for spinal applications. Spine Technology Handbook 2006, 11-33. Academic Press, Burlington. S.M. Kurtz, A.A. Edidin (Eds.).
15. Ingham E., Fisher J. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1271-1286.
16. Kurtz S.M. An Overview of PEEK Biomaterials, PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 2012, 1-7. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford.
17. Jeffrey M. Biocompatibility of Polyaryletheretherketone Polymers, PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 2012, 81-92. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford.
18. Kurtz S.M. Applications of Polyaryletheretherketone in Spinal Implants: Fusion and Motion Preservation, PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 2012, 201-220. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford.
19. Toth J.M., Wang M., Estes B.T., Scifert J.L., Seim H.B., Turner A.S. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006, 27:324-334.
20. Hallab N.J., McAllister K., Brady M., Jarman-Smith M. Macrophage reactivity to different polymers demonstrates particle size- and material-specific reactivity: PEEK-OPTIMA particles versus UHMWPE particles in the submicron, micron, and 10μm size ranges. Journal of Biomedial Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 2012, 100:480-492.
21. ISO 18192-1:2011. Implants for Surgery-Wear of Total Intervertebral Spinal Disc Prostheses Part 1: Loading and Displacement Parameters for Wear Testing and Corresponding Environmental Conditions for Test ISO International Standards. International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
22. Scholes S.C., Green S.M., Unsworth A. The wear of metal-on-metal total hip prostheses measured in a hip simulator. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2001, 215:523-530.
23. Tipper J.L., Firkins P.J., Besong A.A., Barbour P.S.M., Nevelos J., Stone M.H., Ingham E., Fisher J. Characterisation of wear debris from UHMWPE on zirconia ceramic, metal-on-metal and alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses generated in a physiological anatomical hip joint simulator. Wear 2001, 250:120-128.
24. Moghadas P.M., Mahomed A., Hukins D.W.L., Shepherd D.E.T. Wear in metal-on-metal total disc arthroplasty. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2013, 227:356-361.
25. Grupp T.M., Meisel H.J., Cotton J.A., Schwiesau J., Fritz B., Blömer W., Jansson V. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2010, 31:523-531.
26. Moghadas P.M., Mahomed A., Hukins D.W.L., Shepherd D.E.T. Friction in metal-on-metal total disc arthroplasty: effect of ball radius. Journal of Biomechanics 2012, 45:504-509.
27. Jin Z., Fisher J. Tribology in joint replacement. Joint Replacement Technology 2008, 31-50. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. A.P. Revell (Ed.).
28. Joyce T.J. Biopolymer tribology. Polymer Tribology 2009, 227-266. Imperial College Press, London. S.K. Sinha, B.J. Briscoe (Eds.).
29. Xin H., Shepherd D.E.T., Dearn K.D. PEEK (Polyther-ether-ketone) based cervical total disc arthroplasty: contact stress and lubrication analysis. Open Biomedical Engineering Journal 2012, 6:73-79.
30. Moghadas P.M., Shepherd D.E.T., Hukins D.W.L., Mahomed A. Polymer-on-metal or metal-on-polymer total disc arthroplasty: does it make a difference?. Spine 2012, 37:1834-1838.
31. Victrex PEEK™ 450G datasheet. 2012. Victrex Ltd. Avaliable from http://www.victrex.com/en/peek-450g-polymer.php.
32. M. Kraft, D. Koch, M. Bushelow, Evaluation of PEEK on PEEK as a new articulation concept for cervical total disc replacement devices. Annunal meeting of the German spine society. 2011. Avaliable from http://www.medicalpeek.org/pub_reports/view/143.
33. Brown T., Bao Q.B., Hallab N. Biotribological Assessment of Nunec, a PEEK on PEEK Cervical Disc Replacement According to ISO and ASTM Recommendations 2009, SAS, London, England.
34. Scholes S.C., Unsworth A. The wear performance of PEEK-OPTIMA based self-mating couples. Wear 2010, 268:380-387.