Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: A systematic review

European Spine Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 177-184

  Zechmeister, Ingrid ^a   Winkler, Roman ^a   Mad, Philipp ^a,b  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b WILHELMINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

Artificial disc replacement; Cervical spine; Fusion surgery; Patient related outcomes; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ALLERGIC REACTION; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; CERVICAL TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADICULOPATHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND INFECTION;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79951680468     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1583-7     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. PA Anderson RC Sasso KD Riew PA Anderson RC Sasso KD Riew 2008 Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis Spine 33 1305 1312 18496341
2. Blue Cross Blue Shield A (2007) Artificial lumbar disc replacement. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBS), Chicago
3. Blue Cross Blue Shield A (2008) Artificial intervertebral disc arthroplasty for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. Technology evaluation center assessment program. Executive summary, vol 24, pp 1-4
4. N Boos R Rieder V Schade KF Spratt N Semmer M Aebi 1995 1995 Volvo award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations Spine 20 2613 2625 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmtlKgtw%3D%3D 8747239 (Pubitemid 26011068)
5. L Cheng L Nie L Zhang Y Hou L Cheng L Nie L Zhang Y Hou 2009 Fusion versus Bryan cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study Int Orthop 33 1347 1351 18956190
6. TF Fekete F Porchet 2009 Overview of disc arthroplasty-past, present and future Acta Neurochir 152 392 404
7. Gartlehner G (2007) Internes Manual. Abläufe und Methoden. In: LBI-HTA (ed) LBI-HTA, Vienna
8. Grob D, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Luca A, Mutter U, Mannion AF (2009) A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects. Eur Spine J 19(2):297-306
9. G Guyatt A Oxman G Vist R Kunz Y Falck-Ytter P Alonso-Coello H Schünemann 2008 For the GRADE Working Group Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations Br Med J 336 924 926 (Pubitemid 351632017)
10. JG Heller RC Sasso SM Papadopoulos PA Anderson RG Fessler RJ Hacker D Coric JC Cauthen DK Riew JG Heller RC Sasso SM Papadopoulos PA Anderson RG Fessler RJ Hacker D Coric JC Cauthen DK Riew 2009 Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial Spine 34 101 107 19112337
11. Higgins JPT, Green S, The Cochrane Collaboration (eds) (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009)
12. Medical Advisory Secretariat (2006) Artificial disc replacement for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease-update: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MAS), Toronto
13. PV Mummaneni JK Burkus RW Haid VC Traynelis TA Zdeblick PV Mummaneni JK Burkus RW Haid VC Traynelis TA Zdeblick 2007 Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial J Neurosurg Spine 6 198 209 17355018 (Pubitemid 47066071)
14. D Murrey M Janssen R Delamarter J Goldstein J Zigler B Tay B Darden D Murrey M Janssen R Delamarter J Goldstein J Zigler B Tay B Darden 2009 Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease Spine J 9 275 286 18774751
15. A Nabhan F Ahlhelm T Pitzen WI Steudel J Jung K Shariat O Steimer F Bachelier D Pape A Nabhan F Ahlhelm T Pitzen WI Steudel J Jung K Shariat O Steimer F Bachelier D Pape 2007 Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study Eur Spine J 16 423 430 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7msFCitQ%3D%3D 17106665 (Pubitemid 46440185)
16. FM Phillips TR Allen JJ Regan TJ Albert A Cappuccino JG Devine JE Ahrens JA Hipp PC McAfee FM Phillips TR Allen JJ Regan TJ Albert A Cappuccino JG Devine JE Ahrens JA Hipp PC McAfee 2009 Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study Spine 34 556 565 19240664
17. JT Robertson SM Papadopoulos VC Traynelis JT Robertson SM Papadopoulos VC Traynelis 2005 Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study J Neurosurg Spine 3 417 423 16381202
18. LH Sekhon W Sears N Duggal LHS Sekhon W Sears N Duggal 2005 Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients J Neurosurg Spine 3 335 341 16302626
19. W. C. B. Evidence Based Practice Group (2005) Artificial cervical and lumbar disc implants: a review of the literature. WorkSafe BC Richmond, BC