Maternal naming of object wholes versus parts to preverbal infants: A fine-grained analysis of scaffolding at 6-8 months

Infant Behavior and Development

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 470-479

  Gogate, Lakshmi J ^a   Maganti, Madhavilatha ^b   Laing, Kerry B ^c  

^a FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD   (India)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Communicative development; Cross cultural maternal naming; Extended cognition; Infancy; Multimodal motherese; Scaffolding; Word mapping

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; MALE; MATERNAL NAMING; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNICATION; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; MOTHERS;

EID: 84877325083     PISSN: 01636383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barsalou L., Breazeal C., Smith L.B. Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(2):79-91.
2. Bortfeld H., Shaw K., Depowski N. A miracle year: From basic structure to social communication. Theoretical and computational models of word learning: Trends in psychology and artificial intelligence 2013, 153-171. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. L. Gogate, G. Hollich (Eds.).
3. Clark A., Chalmers D. The extended mind. Analysis 1998, 58(1):7-19.
4. Fernald A., Simon T. Expanded intonation contours in mothers' speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 1984, 20(1):104-113.
5. Field, A. (2008). Research methods in psychology: Repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS. Retrieved from: . http://www.statisticshell.com/repeatedmeasures.pdf.
6. Giralt N., Bloom P. How special are objects?. Psychological Science 2000, 11(6):497-510.
7. Gogate L.J. Learning of syllable-object relations by preverbal infants: The role of temporal synchrony and syllable distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 105:178-197.
8. Gogate L.J., Bahrick L.E., Watson J.D. A study of multimodal motherese: The role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. Child Development 2000, 71(4):878-894.
9. Gogate L.J., Bolzani L.H., Betancourt E.A. Attention to maternal multimodal naming by 6- to 8-month-old infants and learning of word-object relations. Infancy 2006, 9(3):259-288.
10. Gogate L.J., Hollich G.J. Invariance detection within an interactive system: A perceptual gateway to language development. Psychological Review 2010, 171(2):496-516.
11. Gogate L., Hollich G. Timing matters: Dynamic interactions create sensitive periods for word learning. Theoretical and computational models of word learning: Trends in psychology and artificial intelligence 2013, 28-48. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. Gogate, Hollich (Eds.).
12. Golinkoff R.M., Mervis C.B., Hirsh-Pasek K. Early object labels: The case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language 1994, 21:125-155.
13. Hansen M.B., Markman E.M. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to learn labels for parts of objects. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45(2):592-596.
14. Hockema S.A., Smith L.B. Learning your language, outside-in and inside-out. Linguistics 2009, 47:453-479.
15. Hollich G., Golinkoff R.M., Hirsh-Pasek K. Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient parts. Developmental Psychology 2007, 43(5):1051-1061.
16. Jesse A., Johnson E. Audiovisual alignment in child-directed speech facilitates the detection of speaker intent in a word-learning setting. Proceedings of the 50th Conference of Experimental Psychologists 2008.
17. Kobayashi H. How 2-year-old children learn novel part names of unfamiliar objects. Cognition 1998, 68:B41-B51.
18. Markman E.M., Wachtel G.F. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 1988, 20:121-157.
19. Masur E.F. Maternal labeling of novel and familiar objects: Implications for children's development of lexical constraints. Journal of Child Language 1997, 24(2):427-439.
20. Matatyaho D.J., Gogate L.J. Type of maternal object motion during synchronous naming predicts preverbal infants' learning of word-object relations. Infancy 2008, 13(2):172-184.
21. Matatyaho, D., Gogate, L. J., Cadavid, S., Abdel-Motaleb, M., & Mason, Z. Type of object motion facilitates word-mapping in preverbal infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, in press.
22. Matatyaho D.J., Mason Z., Gogate L.J. Word learning by eight-month-old infants: The role of object motion and synchrony. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics 2007, 201-202.
23. Ninio A. Ostensive definition in vocabulary teaching. Journal of Child Language 1980, 7:565-573.
24. Pinker S., Prince A. The nature of human concepts: Evidence from an unusual source. Communication and Cognition 1996, 29:307-361.
25. Quine W.V.O Word and object 1960, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Rakison D.H., Poulin-Dubois D. You go this way and I'll go that way: Developmental changes in infants' detection of correlations among static and dynamic features in motion events. Child Development 2002, 73(3):682-699.
27. Samuelson L., Spencer J., Jenkins G. A dynamic field model of word learning. Theoretical and computational models of word learning: Trends in psychology and artificial intelligence 2013, 1-27. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. L. Gogate, G. Hollich (Eds.).
28. Saylor M.M., Sabbagh M.A., Baldwin D.A. Children use whole-part juxtaposition as a pragmatic cue to word meaning. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38(6):993-1003.
29. Saylor M.M., Sabbagh M.A. Different kinds of information affect word learning in the preschool years: The case of part-term learning. Child Development 2004, 75:395-408.
30. Smith L.B. Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review 2005, 25:278-298.
31. Smith L.B., Jones S.S., Landau B., Gershkoff-Stowe L., Samuelson L. Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science 2002, 13(1):13-19.
32. Spencer J., Blumberg M.S., McMurray B., Robinson S.R., Samuelson L.K., Tomblin J.B. Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate. Child Development Perspectives 2009, 3(2):79-87.
33. Yoshida H., Smith L.B. What's in view for the toddlers? Using a head-camera to study visual experience. Infancy 2008, 13(3):229-248.
34. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9(4):625-636.
35. Zukow P.G. Socio-perceptual bases for the emergence of language: An alternative to innatist approaches. Developmental Psychobiology 1990, 23:705-726.