Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 599-632

  Bryce, Tom G K ^a   Day, Stephen P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Discussion; Global warming; Scepticism; Scientific literacy; Socio scientific issues

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877308574     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-013-9500-0     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. ACIA (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Scientific Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. See at http://amap.no/acia/.
2. Adam, D. (2010). The hottest year. Nature,468, 362–364.
3. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Aikenhead, G. (2007). Expanding the research agenda for Scientific Literacy. In C. Linder, L. Ostman & P-O Wickman, P-O. (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus tercentenary symposium held at Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden, May 2007. http://nadidaktik.se/MSU/sem9/Linneproceedings.pdf.
5. Alvermann, D. E., O’Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly,25, 296–322.
6. Bauer, H. H. (2006). The two-edged sword of Skepticism: occam’s razor and occam’s lobotomy. Journal of Scientific Exploration,20, 421–427. doi: http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_20_3_bauer.pdf.
7. Billingsley, K. L. (2010, April 22). Dump Doomsday Dogma. FrontPage Magazine. http://www.pacificresearch.org/press/dump-doomsday-dogma.
8. Black, R. (2011). Global warming ‘confirmed’ by independent study. BBC front page, 21 October.
9. Booker, C. (2009). The real global warming disaster. London: Continuum.
10. Booker, C. (2011, 17 January). Charles Darwin zealots have made science a substitute religion. The Telegraph.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/4550448/Charles-Darwin-zealots-have-made-science-a-substitute-religion.html.
11. Briffa, K. R., Bartholin, T. S., Eckstein, D., Jones, P. D., Karlén, W., Schweingruber, F. H., & Zetterberg, P. (1990). A 1,400-year tree-ring record of summer temperatures in Fennoscandia. Nature,346, 434–439. doi:10.1038/346434a0.
12. Briffa, K. R., Jones, P. D., Wigley, T. M. L., Pilcher, J. R., & Baillie, M. G. L. (1983). Climate reconstruction from tree rings: Part 1, basic methodology and preliminary results for England. International Journal of Climatology,3, 233–242.
13. Bryce, T. G. K. (2010) Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 5, 591–612. Also published on-line March 2010. doi 10.1007/s11422-010-9266-6.
14. Bryce, T. G. K., & Gray, D. S. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education,26, 717–733. doi:10.1080/0950069032000138833.
15. Burbules, N., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review,61, 393–416.
16. Bybee, R. B. (2009). Program for international student assessment (PISA) 2006 and scientific literacy: A perspective for science education leaders. Science Educator,18, 1–13.
17. Calder, N. (2003). Magic Universe: The Oxford guide to modern science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Cambridge Editorial Partnership. (2010). Speeches that changed the world. London: Quercus Publishing Plc.
19. Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education,92, 165–181.
20. Carter, R. M. (2010). Climate: The counter consensus. London: Stacey International.
21. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,7, 883–908. doi:10.1002/tea.20385.
22. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research,64, 1–35.
23. COP15. (2009). United Nations climate change conference. Accessed on 5 November 2010 at http://en.cop15.dk.
24. COP16. (2010). United Nations climate change conference. Accessed on 15 December 2010 at http://www.cc2010.mx/en/.
25. COP17. (2011). United Nations climate change conference. Accessed on 12 December 2011 at http://www.cop17-cmp7durban.com/.
26. Dansgaard, W., Johnsen, S., Moller, J., & Langway, C. C, Jr. (1969). One thousand centuries of climate record from cAMP century on the Greenland ice sheet. Science,166, 377–380. doi:10.1126/science.166.3903.377.
27. Davis, B., Brewer, S., Stevenson, A., & Guit, J. (2003). The temperature of Europe during the Holocene reconstructed from pollen data. Quaternary Science Reviews,17, 1701–1716. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00173-2.
28. Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2011). Does the discussion of socio-scientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers’ thinking? International Journal of Science Education,33, 1675–1702. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.519804.
29. Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2012). The benefits of cooperative learning to socio-scientific discussion in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education,. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.642324.
30. Fall, S., Watts, A., Nielson-Gammon, J., Jones, E., Niyogi, D., Christy, J. R., et al. (2011). Analysis of the impacts of station exposure on the U.S. historical climatology network temperatures and temperature trends. Journal of Geophysical Research,116, D14120. doi:10.1029/2010JD015146.
31. Feynman, R. P. (2000). The pleasure of finding things out. London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
32. Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education,92, 404–423. doi:10.1002/sce.20263.
33. Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Glover, C. (2010, Mar 14). The climate guru warming to non-believers. Sunday Times, p. 9.
35. Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth. Los Angeles: Paramount Pictures.
36. Haigh, J. D., Winning, A. R., Toumi, R., & Harder, J. W. (2010). An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate. Nature,467, 696–699. doi:10.1038/nature09426.
37. Hanze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction,17, 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004.
38. Henson, B. (2011). The rough guide to climate change (3rd ed.). London: Rough Guides.
39. Hess, D. E. (2004). Discussion in social studies: Is it worth the trouble? Social Education,68, 151–155.
40. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education,25, 645–670. doi:10.1080/09500690305021.
41. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., & Ephraums, J. (Eds.). (1990). Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment, WG1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. UNFCCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. See at: http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
43. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contributions from Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. In S. Solomon, et al. (Eds.), Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Jenkins, E. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review,71(256), 43–51.
45. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
46. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
47. Kaufmann, R. K., Kauppi, H., Mann, M. L., & Stock, J. H. (2011). Reconciling anthropogenic climate change with observed temperature 1998–2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 11790–11793. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102467108.
48. Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education,85, 291–310. doi:10.1002/sce.1011.
49. Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). ‘To trust or not to trust,’.- pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education,23, 877–901. doi:10.1080/09500690010016102.
50. Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education,28, 1689–1716. doi:10.1080/09500690600560878.
51. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Laframboise, D. (2011). The delinquent teenager who was mistaken for the world’s top climate expert: IPCC exposed. Toronto: Amazon.
53. Lakatos, I. (1978). Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Larson, B. E. (2000). Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education,16, 661–677. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00013-5.
55. Lawson, A. E. (2009). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation and discovery. Science Education,94, 336–364. doi:10.1002/sce.20357.
56. Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education,28, 1201–1224. doi:10.1080/09500690600560753.
57. Levinson, R. (2012). A perspective on knowing about global warming and a critical comment about schools and curriculum in relation to socio-scientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education,7, 693–701. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1.
58. Lovelock, J. (2007). Climate change on the living earth. Lecture given to The Royal Society, 29 October. Accessed on March 12, 2010 at http://royalsociety.org/General_WF.aspx?pageid=4294968606&terms=lovelock.
59. MacKie, R. (2010, November 14) Climate change: Science’s fresh fight to win over the skeptics. The Guardian.http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/nov/14/climate-change-science-email-scandal.
60. Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S. & Hughes, M. K. (1999). Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the last millennium: Inferences, uncertainties and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters. 26. 6. doi:10.1029/1999GL900070.
61. McCulloch, J. (1985). Lickona’s curriculum for cooperation. Ethics in Education,4, 12–15.
62. Merton, R. K. (1962). Social theory and social structures. New York: Free Press.
63. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
64. Norris, S. P. (1995). Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education,79, 201–217. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790206.
65. OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
66. Oppenheimer, R. (2010). Speech on the atomic age and scientific responsibility, 2 November 1945, cited in Speeches that changed the world, Cambridge Editorial Partnership, London: Quercus Publishing Plc.
67. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science,328, 463–466. doi:10.1126/science.1183944.
68. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41, 994–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035.
69. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education,26, 411–423. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072746.
70. Payne, M. (2010). Critical theory. In M. Payne & J. R. Barbera (Eds.), A dictionary of cultural and critical theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
71. Pearce, F. (2010, February 9). Hockey stick graph took pride of place in IPCC report despite doubts. The Guardian. See at http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/09/hockey-stick-graph-ipcc-report.
72. Popper, K. (1982). The open universe. London: Hutchinson.
73. Radic, V., & Hock, R. (2011). Regionally differentiated contribution of mountain glaciers and ice caps to future sea-level rise. Nature Geoscience,. doi:10.1038/ngeo1052.
74. Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
75. Ridley, M. (2011). Scientific Heresy. The Angus Millar Lecture of the Royal Society of the Arts, Edinburgh, 31 October.
76. Roberts, D. A. (2007a). Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). A project of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
77. Roberts, D. A. (2007b). Linne scientific literacy symposium. Opening remarks. In C. Linder, L. Ostman & P-O Wickman. (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium held at Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden, May 2007. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:40649.
78. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
79. Russell, M. (2010). The independent climate change E-mails review. www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf.
80. Rutherford, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education,36, 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260108560166.
82. Sadler, T. (2004). Moral and ethical dimensions of socio-scientific decision making as integral components of scientific literacy. Science Educator,13, 39–48.
83. Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Chambers, F. W. (2004). Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education,26, 387–409. doi:10.1080/0950069032000119456.
84. Sadler, T., Barab S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socio-scientific inquiry? Research in Science Education,37, 371–391. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.
85. Shackleton, N., & Opdyke, N. (1973). Oxygen isotope and palaeomagnetic stratigraphy of equatorial Pacific core V28–238: Oxygen isotope temperatures and ice volumes in a 105 and 106 year scale. Quaternary Research,3(1), 39–55. doi:10.1016/0033-5894(73)90052-5.
86. Shackley, S., Young, P., Parkinson, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modeling: Are GCMs the best tools? Climatic Change,38, 159–205. doi:10.1023/A:1005310109968.
87. Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
88. Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: What has science education got to do with it? Science & Education,21, 33–53. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1.
89. Sim, S. (2006). Empires of belief: why we need scepticism and doubt in the twenty-first century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
90. Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
91. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and the cooperative school. Educational Leadership,47, 52–54.
92. SPPI (2010). Surface temperature records: Policy-driven deception? J. D’Aleo and A. Watts. Science and Public Policy Institute. See at http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/policy_driven_deception.html?Itemid=0.
93. Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (1994). Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering, students and teacher. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
94. Winstanley, D. (2000). In support of skepticism. Environmental Science & Policy,3, 19–20.
95. Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.